Medical Doctors Versus Spin Doctors: Sorting Through Conflicting Information

[Guest guest]

Medical Doctors Versus Spin Doctors: Sorting Through Conflicting Information

http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/EMIHC251/9273/35328/405559.html?d=dmtHMSCon\

tent

Dec. 28, 2004

By H. Shmerling, M.D. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Have you ever noticed that what your doctor says about a medicine is

different from what you hear in advertisements or in the news? The

differences may be subtle, perhaps the choice of words, or something

more dramatic. In fact, it may seem like one of the sources of

information — whether the media or your doctor — must be wrong. When

these differences arise, it’s natural to wonder: If one medicine is

clearly best in the television ads, why is a different course of

treatment being recommended by your doctor? There are several possible

explanations, and sorting them out may be helpful to you in

understanding what your doctor is saying and how to make better health

care choices.

The Facts Seem Simple

For years, I watched advertisements for various remedies and wondered

how the claims they made could be true — after all, we’d been taught a

very different version of the facts in medical school and in later

training. For example, consider pain relievers for “aches and pains”

such as muscle soreness or minor injuries. The nonsteroidal

anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including aspirin, naproxen and

ibuprofen) and acetaminophen-containing medicines (such as Tylenol) are

the main players for over-the-counter options. Here are some relevant

facts about them (at least as we know them now):

* Effectiveness of the over-the-counter NSAIDs (including the many

formulations of aspirin, Advil, Motrin IB and Alleve) are considered

equivalent; in fact, when comparable doses are taken, even the

prescription forms of NSAIDs are about the same in terms of how well

they work.

* The NSAIDs provide pain relief in two ways: by reducing

inflammation, wherever it may be, and by a direct pain-relieving

(analgesic) effect on the brain.

* The side-effect profiles of over-the-counter NSAIDs are also

similar to one another, although uncoated aspirin may cause a higher

incidence of stomach problems. For the most part, though, they all have

the same side-effect profile, with the most common problem being upset

stomach and occasional ulcer disease. They may also worsen kidney

failure in people with pre-existing kidney disease. Older NSAIDs,

including those available over the counter, thin the blood a bit, which

may be a problem for people with bleeding problems or easy bruising.

* Acetaminophen (as in Tylenol and many other products) causes far

fewer (if any) stomach problems, provides similar pain-relieving effect

as NSAIDs for many conditions, but has little or no anti-inflammatory

effect.

* NSAIDs and acetaminophen reduce fever; when a fever is present,

some of their benefits are probably related to this effect. However,

when the issue is solely fever reduction, acetaminophen is usually the

preferred choice because it is considered safer.

* The dosing schedule varies between these drugs:

o Acetaminophen is taken every four to six hours.

o Naproxen (as in Alleve) is taken two to three times a day.

o Ibuprofen (as in Motrin IB or Advil) is taken up to four times a day.

The dosing differences do not imply that one is stronger, more or

less effective or more or less risky to take; the differences are simply

a consequence of how they are broken down by the body and, therefore,

how long they last in the body’s tissues.

Spinning The Facts

Even if everyone (doctors, patients, drug advertisers, news media, the

FDA and agencies that oversee drug manufacturing, promotion and

truth-in-advertising) agreed on the above facts, “spin” can alter how

these facts are delivered. For example, one or another of the

manufacturers could truthfully make the following claims, each

suggesting that one medicine is superior to its competitors (even when

it isn't):

* “Nothing is proven stronger.” That’s true since they are all

about the same in terms of effectiveness.

* “Just one pill provides all the relief you’ll need for the day.”

That may be true, but that’s a matter of convenience for the less

frequently dosed medicines, not “power” or overall effectiveness.

* “I don’t care about the studies. I just know it works for me.”

Testimonials about one or another pain reliever being the best are

readily available for each and every one of them, so one should never

rely too heavily on them. Remember that the person making these

statements is usually being paid by the drug’s maker.

* “When doctors and hospitals choose, more of them prefer this

drug. " While this may be true, it's important to note why they are

choosing the medicine; a bit of information that may be left out of the

claim. For example, acetaminophen may be the most commonly prescribed

pain reliever in hospitals, but that may be due to its fever-relieving

capacity that it is prescribed so often. If you are looking for a pain

reliever and you don't have a fever, that claim may mislead you into

thinking that acetaminophen is a better pain reliever.

Consider The Source

A recent analysis of research comparing chiropractic care with

traditional approaches (such as exercise and medications) found no

difference between the two in terms of effectiveness, and both were

better than no treatment. It also demonstrated how spin can alter the

message even while sticking to the facts. News articles interviewing

chiropractors hailed the study as proof that nothing is more effective

than spinal manipulation and that it represents a safe alternative to

medications. Other news reports said the study was a disappointment to

the advocates of chiropractic manipulation because it did not find that

such care was better than other types of care and may cost more. Some

predicted that based on this research, insurers would be more likely to

cover chiropractic care for back pain; other news articles stated just

the opposite.

One finding of the study that was buried in the “spin” was that neither

traditional therapies nor chiropractic care were dramatically helpful

compared with no treatment! With all of this shifting emphasis depending

on the messenger, no wonder the message from your own doctor may differ

from that you happen to read or hear in the news.

There are many other examples of this phenomenon. If you ask your doctor

about allergy medicines (such as Allegra or Claritin), the newest

anti-inflammatory medications (such as Bextra or Celebrex), or medicines

for heartburn (including Nexium or Prilosec), your doctor may suggest a

different treatment. A nonprescription medication or an older, generic

medicine may work as well at a fraction of the cost. Your doctor may

even suggest no medication for your problem, especially if symptoms are

mild and avoidable. For example, some allergy sufferers can simply avoid

certain plants at particular times of the year and do well without

medicines.

A common situation that I encounter in the office is the request for a

medication that a friend or family member is taking. It’s a logical

question — there seem to be no side effects and it’s working well for

them, so why not try it? If your doctor is not enthusiastic about the

idea, it may be because your symptoms or illness is quite different from

that of your friend, or your other medical problems and medications may

make that treatment less attractive. In that situation, what your doctor

is saying is this: Each person is different so the risks and benefits of

treatment will differ.

Why Spin?

Although the ideal situation might be objective, scientific analysis

driving every medical decision, the fact is that there is much we don’t

know, we all have our biases and are affected by the bias of others. The

undeniable truth is that “reversing spin” is an enormous challenge.

Consider the following reasons that operate to manipulate the health

care message:

* Bias may not be conscious. Imagine that your doctor was trained

by a world expert in infectious disease and urged the use of a

particular antibiotic for a common condition. Years later, your doctor

may be prescribing that treatment even if better ones have come along,

in part because of the impression made by his or her mentor. Similarly,

a friend or family member’s experience with a medicine or treatment may

powerfully affect your views on it. In both of these examples, the

existence of bias may not be obvious.

* Bias may be intentional. Experts in marketing know how to take a

fact and emphasize one aspect, downplay another and present it in a way

that directly influences opinions, decisions and behaviors. Although you

may not always realize it’s going on, advertisers and others with a

vested interest in the health care decisions you make with your doctors

may consciously deliver a biased message and that may differ from the

one you hear from your own doctor.

* Perspective matters. Your doctor is primarily interested in your

health and well-being while your other sources of information may be

focusing on other issues (news media want readers or viewers; drug

manufacturers want more prescriptions written for the medications they

make; health care maintenance organizations want to promote the quality

of their members’ care while also controlling costs, and so on). The

difference in these perspectives will often explain the difference in

the message you read or hear in ads or the news and the one you hear

from your doctor.

Conclusions

When it comes to health care decisions, the facts are important but so

is spin. Simply recognizing that spin is at work is not easy. Perhaps

the best any of us can do is to stay informed, relying as much as

possible on impartial information from sources that are not trying to

sell us something. Read medical writers who seem to look at stories from

more than one side. But recognize that everyone is biased to some degree

and everyone has a perspective that influences his or her outlook.

Recognize that there may be a number of good explanations (and some that

aren't so good) for why the message of news media and advertisements

differs so much from what your doctor is saying. My advice is this: Be

skeptical about what you read or hear and, importantly, consider the source.

Establish a relationship with a doctor you trust and ask questions about

something you’ve heard or read, especially if you are unsure about the

reliability of the source. Ask why your prescription is being changed.

Perhaps you would elect to pay a higher price out of pocket to stay on

it, or perhaps you’re willing to switch because your insurance company

wants you to, but either way, you’ll be better informed if you ask about

it. Academic medical centers and government agencies are often good

sources of information because they do not have “vested interests”

likely to alter the medical message — but that may just be my bias.

H. Shmerling, M.D., is associate physician at Beth Israel

Deaconess Medical Center and associate professor at Harvard Medical

School. He has been a practicing rheumatologist for over 20 years at

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. He is an active teacher in the

Internal Medicine Residency Program, serving as the Firm Chief.

He is also a teacher in the Rheumatology Fellowship Program.