Guest guest Posted December 18, 2003 Report Share Posted December 18, 2003 Need Surgery? Choose a Larger Hospital Survival Rates Higher at Hospitals With Higher Volume Original page:http://my.webmd.com/content/Article/77/95451.htm WebMD Medical News http://my.webmd.com/content/article/77/95451.htm Nov. 25, 2003 -- Large regional hospitals may be farther away, but your chances of surviving high-risk surgery there are better. In fact, larger hospitals do high-risk procedures more frequently, and high volume typically means lower death rates, writes lead researcher D. Birkmeyer, MD, a surgeon with the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H. Birkmeyer is also a researcher with the Leapfrog Group, a for-profit coalition that encourages people to receive care at hospitals that meet certain volume criteria. His report appears in the Nov. 26 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Hundreds, if not thousands, of patients die every year because they had high-risk surgery in small hospitals where the procedure is not performed very often, writes Birkmeyer. " For many surgical procedures, mortality rates are substantially lower at hospitals that perform them more frequently. " But would going to a larger hospital -- rather than the local hospital -- involve traveling such long distances that someone might be deterred from having surgery? There has been little research looking at this issue, he says. In his study, Birkmeyer and his colleagues used national Medicare data and U.S. road network information. Their goal: to see just how travel time would be affected if patients were required to travel to high-volume centers for surgery. Specifically, they looked at two surgical procedures -- one involving the pancreas and the other involving the esophagus, which are performed infrequently in smaller hospitals. Medicare data showed that death rates were 12% higher when the procedures were performed at very low-volume hospitals, reports Birkmeyer. They matched patients' ZIP codes with ZIP codes for the hospital where they had their surgery. Then they matched ZIP codes for a higher-volume hospital. They also factored in travel costs, travel speed, available highways and ferry crossings, and travel time. Low volume was defined as performing one or two surgeries per year, and very high volume was defined as more than 16 surgeries per year. The results: * With both types of surgery, 61% of patients traveled less than 30 minutes to a low-volume hospital; 76% less than one hour; 10% traveled at least three hours. * If they went to higher-volume hospitals, overall travel times would increase -- but only modestly if they went to hospitals meeting low- or medium-volume standards. If they went to very high-volume hospitals, travel time would increase much more substantially. * To travel to a hospital meeting low-volume standards, about 15% of patients would need to change hospitals. Most would need to travel less than 30 additional minutes. About 10% of patients would increase their travel times by an hour or more; 3% would have to travel three hours or more. * About 25% of patients already lived closer to a higher-volume hospital -- not the top-of-the-line -- so their travel time could even decrease. * To get to a very high-volume hospital, about 80% of patients would need to change hospitals. Of these, more than 50% would increase their travel time by at least one hour. Patients living in rural areas accounted for about 15% of Medicare patients having these procedures. These patients traveled significantly longer for surgery than patients living in nonrural areas -- even to get to a low-volume hospital. To reach hospitals meeting low- or medium-volume standards, travel times for these patients would not change substantially for either procedure, Birkmeyer reports. To reach hospitals meeting very high-volume standards, however, nearly 75% of all patients would travel two hours or more. " The present findings suggest that low- or even medium-volume standards could be set for [these surgeries] without imposing unreasonable travel burdens on most patients, " writes Birkmeyer. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services has set minimum volume requirements for hospitals where Medicare patients may have certain transplant procedures. His findings in this study suggest that a similar policy could be safely established for other procedures without concern that patients would have to travel too far, writes Birkmeyer. SOURCE: Birkmeyer, J. The Journal of the American Medical Association, Nov. 26, 2003; vol 290: pp 2703-2708. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.