Re : HIV tests follow different rules than other antibody tests

[Guest guest]

Hi Bee, 

When you get a chance, could you give me a good reference on HIV/AIDS? Thanks,

Helene

--- En date de : Jeu 2.12.10, Bee <beeisbuzzing2003@...> a écrit :

De: Bee <beeisbuzzing2003@...>

Objet: [ ] HIV tests follow different rules than other antibody

tests

À:

Date: Jeudi 2 décembre 2010, 4h57

 

HIV tests follow different rules than other antibody tests:

The Antibody Theory Only Works in a Laboratory

When it comes to the antibody theory please remember that antibodies are tested

only in a laboratory, and as the article " Jabs and Journeys " states: " . . .

vaccinations [to build up antibodies] are artificial procedures which can be

found to be protective in artificial situations.

What we want to know is how effective are they in the natural situation of the

real world? The laboratory can tell us little about this. "

This, in addition to the fact that the medical community follows these antibody

rules:

1. High antibodies [to something] equals an allergy.

2. High antibodies equals immunity [to a disease].

3. However, in the case of HIV high antibodies means you are infectious! ? ?

Facts About Antibodies

1. People who are the most immune have low antibodies levels - see Immunity to

Disease Theory below.

2. If HIV tests were not diluted to a ratio of 1:400 everyone would have

infectious HIV - see HIV Tests below.

3. Antibody allergy tests are based on the theory that high circulating

levels of IgG antibodies correlate with clinical food allergy signs and

symptoms, however high serum levels of IgG and other allergy tests has not been

studied, nor verified, therefore it is quite a leap to conclude that IgG to food

antigens correlates to signs and symptoms of food allergy. In addition to the

fact that laboratories do not use pure antigens to test the blood samples from

patients - see Antibody Tests for Allergies below.

4. Allergic reactions are exactly the same list of symptoms as the list of

healing reactions which are created by the body - see Healing Reactions are Not

Allergic Reactions below.

HIV Tests are Totally Opposite of The Immune Theory

" [in order to do a proper test] . . . extraordinarily high dilution of the

person's serum [400 times] took me by surprise. Most serologic tests that look

for the presence of antibodies against germs uses neat serum [undiluted]. For

example, the tests that look for antibodies to hepatitis A and B viruses,

rubella virus, syphilis, hystoplasma and cryptococus, to mention a few of them,

use straight serum [undiluted].

However, to try to prevent false positive reactions some serologic tests use

diluted serum; for example this is the case with tests that look for antibodies

to measles, varicelia and mumps viruses which use a dilution of 1:16, to

cytomegalovirus [CMV] 1:20 and to Epstein-Barr Virus [EBV] 1:10.

The obvious questions are: What makes HIV so unique that the test serum needs to

be diluted 400 times? And what would happen if the individual's serum is not

diluted?

I first took samples of blood that, at 1:400 dilution, tested negative for

antibodies to HIV. I then ran the exact same serum samples through the test

again, but this time without diluting them. Tested straight, they all came

positive. This would probably mean that the blood that is negative when diluted,

but positive when undiluted, has a lower level of antibodies than the diluted

blood that is doubly positive and, therefore, may probably test negative on the

Western blot test.

The results presented here could also mean that the tests used for detecting

antibodies to HIV are not specific for HIV, as has been explained previously7-4.

In this case, there would be reasons other than HIV infection, past or present,

to explain why a person reacts positive to it. The test also reacts positive in

the absence of HIV (7-14).

Since people are reacting positive on tests that are not specific for HIV, let's

please stop labeling them as " HIV positive " .

The best in health, Bee

[Guest guest]

>

> Hi Bee, 

> When you get a chance, could you give me a good reference on HIV/AIDS?

+++Here you go Helene.

http://www.whale.to/a/hivfraud.html

http://www.whale.to/w/quotes.html

Bee

[Guest guest]

Thanks a lot, Bee. I really appreciate what you do to enlighten people like me.

Helene

--- En date de : Jeu 2.12.10, Bee <beeisbuzzing2003@...> a écrit :

De: Bee <beeisbuzzing2003@...>

Objet: Re: Re : [ ] HIV tests follow different rules than other

antibody tests

À:

Date: Jeudi 2 décembre 2010, 7h54

 

>

> Hi Bee, 

> When you get a chance, could you give me a good reference on HIV/AIDS?

+++Here you go Helene.

http://www.whale.to/a/hivfraud.html

http://www.whale.to/w/quotes.html

Bee