Guest guest Posted September 13, 2010 Report Share Posted September 13, 2010 Here's part 2: He also completely misunderstood why continued large doses of niacin produce less of a reaction over time: " The interesting part of it is that it comes to a point where it doesn't turn on a flush. This doesn't happen by conditioning of the body, that is not what occurs. It runs something out. What does it run out? We knew, from 1950, that it ran out sunburn, which is a radiation burn. And in 1956 the symptoms those on the research program were experiencing - the nausea, vomiting, skin irritations, colitis and nasal disturbances which accompany radiation sickness - were also discharging with the administration of niacin. Niacin in 1956 was no longer just running out sunburn. It was running out something which exactly paralleled radiation sickness. On the Purification program, because quantities of niacin are taken and because of the heat of the sauna, it is possible that it can have the effect of discharging a certain amount, possibly not all, of the accumulated radiation in people. [Hubbard, Clear Body Clear Mind, p.37-38] " In fact, the real reason is the exhaustion of the cells' stock of histamine, a fact of which Hubbard appears to have been unaware. Despite this being proven and experimentally demonstrable (for instance, taking an antihistamine prior to a large niacin dose will reduce the flush, demonstrating the presence of histamine), Narconon relies on Hubbard's bad science rather than the findings of genuine medical research. In recommending niacin overdoses, Hubbard actually intended to produce the flush side effect. Niacinamide, another form of niacin which occurs naturally in the body, does not produce a flush and so is rejected by Hubbard as " worthless " : What the medical profession didn't realize was that niacin itself doesn't turn on a flush - the flush is caused by the fact that sunburn or radiation is being run out. Niacinamide is worthless for the purpose of running out radiation. [Hubbard, All About Radiation, 1989 ed., p.181] In other words, Hubbard mistook a symptom of toxicity for a desirable result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.