Guest guest Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 > > Hi Bee and others, > > I recently read that Bee eats fish or seafood daily but has no mercury in her blood. That is amazing! > > I want to encorporate a high seafood diet but I get scared with all the news that there's many toxins in it. > > Chicken or beef that is grass-fed doesn't have the same pollution scare that seafood does so my tendency is to avoid fish especially for my little 3 year old who's system is still developing and go with chicken or beef. > > I'm so confused and get tired from questioning seafoods health benefits. > +++Hi , I have always felt there was too much " fear mongering " about eating fish and seafoods, particularly by Dr. Mercola. All bodies, including fish, chicken, cows and humans, detoxify themselves very efficiently IF they get the nutrients their bodies are intended to have in order to be healthy. I have fish or seafood that aren't treated with preservatives like sulfites and nitrates. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Bee, thanks for this comment. I completely agree and am glad to hear that others feel that the mercury scare is overblown. > > > > Hi Bee and others, > > > > I recently read that Bee eats fish or seafood daily but has no mercury in her blood. That is amazing! > > > > I want to encorporate a high seafood diet but I get scared with all the news that there's many toxins in it. > > > > Chicken or beef that is grass-fed doesn't have the same pollution scare that seafood does so my tendency is to avoid fish especially for my little 3 year old who's system is still developing and go with chicken or beef. > > > > I'm so confused and get tired from questioning seafoods health benefits. > > > +++Hi , > > I have always felt there was too much " fear mongering " about eating fish and seafoods, particularly by Dr. Mercola. > > All bodies, including fish, chicken, cows and humans, detoxify themselves very efficiently IF they get the nutrients their bodies are intended to have in order to be healthy. > > I have fish or seafood that aren't treated with preservatives like sulfites and nitrates. > > Bee > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2010 Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 Bee, Do you also eat Red meat daily as well as seafood? Since I've been on this diet all I want to eat is Red Meat. I eat Steak almost everyday. My body just craves it. Thanks, Gail (curlygirl) > > Hi Bee and others, > > I recently read that Bee eats fish or seafood daily but has no mercury in her blood. That is amazing! > > I want to encorporate a high seafood diet but I get scared with all the news that there's many toxins in it. > > Chicken or beef that is grass-fed doesn't have the same pollution scare that seafood does so my tendency is to avoid fish especially for my little 3 year old who's system is still developing and go with chicken or beef. > > I'm so confused and get tired from questioning seafoods health benefits. > > Thanks for listening, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2010 Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 > > Bee, > > Do you also eat Red meat daily as well as seafood? Since I've been on this diet all I want to eat is Red Meat. I eat Steak almost everyday. My body just craves it. +++Hi Gail, I'm experimenting by having mostly fish and seafoods for now, but usually I have red meat. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2010 Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 Hi Bee and others, Here is an article that came out this morning on the pollutants in our water affecting our fish http://www.naturalnews.com/029717_chemical_runoff_fish.html If a company or entity was benefitting from scaring us from eating fish due to toxins then it would make sense to me to question the scare but the alarms are being rung by health advocates (The Health Ranger and Dr. Mercola). Big sigh.... Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2010 Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 > > Hi Bee and others, > > Here is an article that came out this morning on the pollutants in our water affecting our fish http://www.naturalnews.com/029717_chemical_runoff_fish.html > > If a company or entity was benefitting from scaring us from eating fish due to toxins then it would make sense to me to question the scare but the alarms are being rung by health advocates (The Health Ranger and Dr. Mercola). +++Hi , Of course the fish in that article are obviously sick, and couldn't be sold on the market for consumers. Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2010 Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 Bee, That's what I don't know. Would those fish and others not be in our food supply? I was shopping in my favorite Asian store and looked around at all the Asians there who were in line to buy the crab, lobster, fish, etc. Many had beautiful wrinkle free skin and looked vibrantly healthy. Also many were old and trim and had straight postures. I notice they buy lots of fish, meats with bones and green leafy veggies. I'm taking all this information to heart. Thanks for being a part of this process. > > > > Hi Bee and others, > > > > Here is an article that came out this morning on the pollutants in our water affecting our fish http://www.naturalnews.com/029717_chemical_runoff_fish.html > > > > If a company or entity was benefitting from scaring us from eating fish due to toxins then it would make sense to me to question the scare but the alarms are being rung by health advocates (The Health Ranger and Dr. Mercola). > > +++Hi , > > Of course the fish in that article are obviously sick, and couldn't be sold on the market for consumers. > > Bee > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2010 Report Share Posted September 13, 2010 > > Bee, > > That's what I don't know. Would those fish and others not be in our food supply? +++Hi . The article below is about the Potomac River, and many inland rivers are polluted, so that's why I recommend fish from the ocean - this is from my article How to Successfully Overcome Candida: " The safest sources of fish are fresh and wild-caught from the ocean, and not from inland lakes, rivers or streams. Fresh fish is not labeled thoroughly so it is wise to ask about the source of the fish, i.e. from farm, lake or ocean, in order to find out whether it is fresh, wild-caught ocean-going fish, or shell fish and fish roe (fish eggs) in season from clean waters. Good fish include Wild Alaskan or Pacific salmon, Summer Flounder, Croaker, Haddock, Arctic Char, fresh sardines, shrimp, herring, and anchovies. Fresh cold-water fish are also good, i.e. tuna, cod, haddock, herring, perch, and snapper are also good since they spend their lifetimes in the open seas distant from contaminated coastal waters. Canned skipjack or albacore tuna are safer than canned bluefin or yellowfin tuna. Small seafood, such as oysters, sardines, anchovies and shrimp are okay to eat since they are small enough to have minimal contamination. Buy all canned fish that is packed in olive oil or spring water. Avoid fish species that stay in coastal waters, or from inland lakes, rivers or streams, and those that consume near the top of the food chain, i.e. bluefish, carp, catfish, striped bass, trout, etc. " All the best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.