Guest guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 I have seen some research that indicates cancer cells are anaerobic, and can be exacerbated by reducing the amount of oxygen in the body. Smoking is one of the prime causes of less oxygen in the blood and cells. I'm not sure about the cancer aspect, but it is a fact that smoking reduces the amount of oxygen available in the body. It could only worsen your health from that aspect. Zack moderator On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:28 AM, polstar0907 <axel543210@...> wrote: > > > Hi all > > cigarrets smoke contains toxins ? I read something here about it but I am > still not sure. > > I though smoking is better than eating sugar .. So what do you think? > > Axel > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Hei Axel, here is the list of the stuff they put in cigarettes, so decide yourself http://quitsmoking.about.com/cs/nicotineinhaler/a/cigingredients.htm As a chemist I can tell you that I would touch most of the stuff even when bottled just with gloves ... BR Tini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 > > Hei Axel, > > here is the list of the stuff they put in cigarettes, so decide yourself > > http://quitsmoking.about.com/cs/nicotineinhaler/a/cigingredients.htm > > As a chemist I can tell you that I would touch most of the stuff even when bottled just with gloves ... > > BR Tini > It's not just about If I want or don't want smoke. I think If I can't eat something sweet so I can replace sugar or whatever to cigarette smoke. But in your link is written cigarette contains toxins, so can't to do it....This is very frustration. I stopped with smoking when I was sick by stomach because of Candida. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 If you search 'cigarettes' in the msg search engine, Bee has mentioned what to do about them a bit. Natalia Sent via BlackBerry® [ ] Re: Smoking ? > > Hei Axel, > > here is the list of the stuff they put in cigarettes, so decide yourself > > http://quitsmoking.about.com/cs/nicotineinhaler/a/cigingredients.htm > > As a chemist I can tell you that I would touch most of the stuff even when bottled just with gloves ... > > BR Tini > It's not just about If I want or don't want smoke. I think If I can't eat something sweet so I can replace sugar or whatever to cigarette smoke. But in your link is written cigarette contains toxins, so can't to do it....This is very frustration. I stopped with smoking when I was sick by stomach because of Candida. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2010 Report Share Posted June 1, 2010 Dear Tini: Thanks for the smoking link. A year or so ago I heard that today's beer was full of chemicals too. Anyone got any links that would confirm that its not such a natural drink anymore? Thanks, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 > > Hi all > > cigarrets smoke contains toxins ? I read something here about it but I am still not sure. > > I though smoking is better than eating sugar .. So what do you think? > +++Hi Axel, There is so much false information about cigarettes and smoking, just like there is about health and many other issues. First of all, it doesn't make sense cigarette companies would purposely add the long list of chemicals " they claim " are in them, since the cost would be tremendous. Second, laboratories cannot find or measure anything other than cotinine in " actual " cigarette smoke. Oddly enough cotinine is a word that was created by rearranging the letters of the word " nicotine " - making words like that is called an " anagram. " Cotinine is found in the smoke, and it is what they measure in urine in order to determine whether a person smokes or not. Strangely enough, nicotine is nicotinic acid, which is actually niacin, or vitamin B3. Even now the medical field is concerned that people who take niacin (B3) or consume foods that contain niacin will screw up their screening tests on smokers. Third, the nicotinic acid in tobacco is high, but it is the same substance found in all green plants, meats and eggs, which is niacin (B3). Tobacco is a green plant and doesn't contain a different or unique substance than other green plants or foods. Niacin actually increases oxygen in the body and opens up the blood vessels, and helps the body get rid of toxins - it's one of the vitamins used to increase oxygen levels in the blood in people with cancer - go to the bottom of this article to see the list of Respiratory Vitamins & Oxygen Therapy: http://www.healingnaturallybybee.com/articles/cancer4.php Statistics on lung cancer indicate 50% of people who get it smoke, while the other 50% doesn't smoke, so smoking is not the common denominator that causes lung cancer. If it was, there would be a 25% decrease in lung cancer when 25% of the people stopped smoking, instead it has increased. I believe the common cause of lung cancer and most lung problems or issues is lack of nutrients, mainly good saturated fats, which the " powers that be " claim is unhealthy for you. That is because while all other cell membranes must be constructed out of 50% saturated fat in order to be healthy, lung cell membranes require 100% saturated fat. So go figure. Also drug companies found a hugh profit in selling smoking cessation products so that why they started the campaign against smoking. They also did it to increase their influence on governments to get more laws passed to benefit their bottom line (profits). Also they are now coming out with nicotine drugs to treat the very diseases they " claim " are caused by smoking, particularly for heart disease. They are coming out with nicotine drugs to treat Parkinson's Disease. Parkinson's disease (also known as Parkinson disease or PD) is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that often impairs the sufferer's motor skills, speech, and other functions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_disease Under Toxins in that reference they also say that mercury poisoning, some kinds of metals, and pesticides shows increased risks for getting Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, they say: Most replicated relationships are an increased risk of PD in those living in rural environments and those exposed to pesticides; and a reduced risk in smokers. <<<<Note: reduced risk in smokers ???? Nicotine (niacin) is the only known substance that prevents the build-up of Lewy Bodies in the brain, and these are what the medical field says causes Parkinson's Disease, some forms of dementia, etc.: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewy_body They also lack of dopamine, produced by the body itself, needs to be increased, so they give drugs that are supposedly the precursor to dopamine. However, smoking increases dopamine production, which is the " feel good " substance people who smoke get addicted to. That's why nicotine drugs are coming out to treat Parkinson's. " Knowledge is power! " The only benefits from smoking cessation is by the drug companies and medical field, and it also lessens freedom of people to make their own choices, and it gets more control over governments. Meanwhile the medicos are forcing their treatments on us with government laws, while taking away our freedom more and more! Follow the money! The best in health, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2010 Report Share Posted June 2, 2010 Hi Bee, +++I dont doubt the facts about lung cancer or niacine that you are presenting, but I was a smoker myself and I am a bit concerned that you answer on the question " Do cigarettes contain toxins " with positive ingredients...what I used to cough up in the mornings wanst healthy, and the hormonal imbalance when I stopped the smoking surely not too... > First of all, it doesn't make sense cigarette companies would purposely add the long list of chemicals " they claim " are in them, since the cost would be tremendous. +++And the smoke does contain stuff like benzols and other heterocycles, I dont think they lie when telling us poisonous ingredients? I think they got forced by trials claiming that they didnt tell about the harmful ingredients, and chemists like be actually analysed it. > > Second, laboratories cannot find or measure anything other than cotinine in " actual " cigarette smoke. Oddly enough cotinine is a word that was created by rearranging the letters of the word " nicotine " - making words like that is called an " anagram. " > > Cotinine is found in the smoke, and it is what they measure in urine in order to determine whether a person smokes or not. Strangely enough, nicotine is nicotinic acid, which is actually niacin, or vitamin B3. Even now the medical field is concerned that people who take niacin (B3) or consume foods that contain niacin will screw up their screening tests on smokers. +++Nicotine is not the same as nicotinic acid, they just contain both a pyridine, but the structure and the chemical behaviour are different...and the smell, as noone of us would voluntarily take the niacin tablets if it would be the same. > > Third, the nicotinic acid in tobacco is high, but it is the same substance found in all green plants, meats and eggs, which is niacin (B3). Tobacco is a green plant and doesn't contain a different or unique substance than other green plants or foods. +++Cigarettes are normally not just tobaccoleaves, they are perfumed, and that perfume is toxic as well. It was shown in animal studies (I dont know what they were fed, but surely the same as the control group) that each cigarette can cause up to 9 gen mutations. I know that most people here dont believe in genes anymore, but I have seen too many patients with inherited people to not tell this fact. > > They are coming out with nicotine drugs to treat Parkinson's Disease. Parkinson's disease (also known as Parkinson disease or PD) is a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system that often impairs the sufferer's motor skills, speech, and other functions. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_disease +++That is simply because nicotine is able to cross the blood-brain-barrier and to stimulate the tissue there, it doesnt mean that it is anyhow protective against neurodegenerative diseases. It reduces the blood flow through vessels which lets less oxygen to the cells, and that is generally counterproductive to overall health. > " Knowledge is power! " The only benefits from smoking cessation is by the drug companies and medical field, and it also lessens freedom of people to make their own choices, and it gets more control over governments. > > Meanwhile the medicos are forcing their treatments on us with government laws, while taking away our freedom more and more! Follow the money! +++Philip /quotes/comstock/13*!pm/quotes/nls/pm (PM 44.78, -0.29, -0.63%) /quotes/comstock/24s!e:pm (FR:PM 36.50, +0.65, +1.81%) reported Thursday that it earned $1.7 billion, or 90 cents a share, on the period, up from $1.48 billion, or 74 cents a share, in the same quarter of 2009. Revenue jumped 17.3% to $15.59 billion from $13.29 billion or to $6.5 billion from $5.6 billion net of excise taxes. The average estimate of analysts polled by FactSet Research had been for the company to earn 91 cents a share on revenue of $6.45 billion. Not all what scientists say is evil, and that finally there are lots of programs to prevent people from cigarette addiction is great. I lost my granny to lung cancer in 2008...I dont know whether it was malnutrition or 50 years of smoking, but in the end that doesnt matter anymore, right?? BR Tini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hey all I don't understand english so good as I wish Bee I thank you for exhausting answer which is independent overview but I need simply answer to my simply question if it is possible. So I though cigarettes are not ok in Candida diet because it contains toxins. If I am right it is fine, of course non comfortable but I will accept it. If cigarettes are ok (I think one cigarette time to time, for example 3 cig. for a week) I will be quite happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hi Tini, Thanks for your thoughts-very helpful. I am pasting the post I did back in Oct 2009 # 79993 giving some links about niacin and nicotine not being the same. I lost my mother and her sister to lung cancer, and a sister to cancer. They all smoked. We are supposed to trim messages, so I trimmed yours, but hated to do so. Below is the post: > > Also nicotine in tobacco is the same nutrient as it is in every other green plant and many foods, which is niacin (B3). > > Bee > Bee, When hearing that, I did a lot of research on that subject. The sources I found said niacin and nicotine were not the same. Since I got to the 10th page by asking about the relationship between niacin and nicotine, I also came across many studies on the dangers of nicotine itself. I am listing the links, and posting the info in that link pertaining to the relationship between niacin and nicotine. After reading them, you can draw your own conclusions. http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/niacin/ Linus ing institute Niacin Niacin is a water-soluble vitamin, which is also known as nicotinic acid or vitamin B3. Nicotinamide is the derivative of niacin and used by the body to form the coenzymes nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP). The chemical structure of the various forms of niacin are shown in the diagram. None of the forms are related to the nicotine found in tobacco, although their names are similar (1). http://www.home-remedies-digest.com/niacin.html it is also known as nicotinic acid, but is not related to nicotine in tobacco http://www.doctoryourself.com/hoffer_niacin.html Vitamin B-3: Niacin and Its Amide by A. Hoffer, M.D., Ph.D. The first water soluble vitamins were numbered in sequence according to priority of discovery. But after their chemical structure was determined they were given scientific names. The third one to be discovered was the anti-pellagra vitamin before it was shown to be niacin. But the use of the number B-3 did not stay in the literature very long. It was replaced by nicotinic acid and its amide (also known medically as niacin and its amide). The name was changed to remove the similarity to nicotine, a poison. Vitamin B-3 exists as the amide in nature, in nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). Pure nicotinamide and niacin are synthetics. Niacin was known as a chemical for about 100 years before it was recognized to be vitamin B-3. It is made from nicotine, a poison produced in the tobacco plant to protect itself against its predators, but in the wonderful economy of nature which does not waste any structures, when the nicotine is simplified by cracking open one of the rings, it becomes the immensely valuable vitamin B-3. http://www.stanford.edu/group/hopes/treatmts/ebuffer/j3.html relationship between Nicotinamide and Nicotine Fig J-4: Structures of Nicotine and NicotinamideNicotinamide was one of the first vitamins ever discovered. Around the same time that it was discovered, scientists also found that nicotine, the addictive substance in tobacco products, can be harmful to humans. One of the ways by which nicotine causes deterimental effects in humans is that it has a similar structure to nicotinamide and can interfere with the absorption and incorporation of the vitamin. Figure J-4 shows the structures of nicotinamide and nicotine. Fig J-5: Competition between Nicotine and NicotinamideNicotine competes with nicotinamide for the binding sites in the enzymes needed for the absorption of nicotinamide, thereby lowering the amounts of nicotinamide available to cells. Figure J-5 shows a diagram depicting the competition between nicotinamide and nicotine. This competition results in the depletion of NAD molecules that the cell needs to produce energy. This is one of the reasons why smoking can worsen the condition of people with mitochondrial dysfunction. http://www.lowering-cholesterol-resources.com/niacin-benefits.html Researchers have discovered many important facts about niacin benefits. Niacin or nicotinic (no relationship to nicotine) acid is called vitamin B3 because it was third in line of the B vitamins to be ascertained as a necessary nutrient. http://www.brightbeginnings.com/questions-vitamins.aspx Is niacin like nicotine? What if my baby takes too much of it? The only relationship between niacin and nicotine is that the first two letters in each word are the same. Your baby could not get too much niacin from his diet or from a vitamin preparation or fortified formula if the prescribed amounts are taken. Niacin is sometimes used to reduce high cholesterol levels in adults. High doses can cause the skin to flush and tingle. Such a reaction would not be caused by the levels of niacin in your milk, in infant formula, or in cow's milk. http://www.essortment.com/all/smokingnicotine_rnor.htm Smoking destroys B vitamins. B12 decreases cellular damage. B3 (niacin) opens circulation constricted by nicotine and lowers cholesterol. B5 (pantothenic acid), especially with vitamin C, protects against stress. Take folic acid (1–2 mg. daily). Choline nourishes the brain. http://www.1healthyworld.com/ezine/vol6no28.cfm Niacin was the first major development in cholesterol therapy. Niacin(vitamin B 3; also called nicotinic acid. No relation to nicotine!) was shown to reduce cholesterol and raise HDL cholesterol as early as the mid 1960's, but it was never widely accepted because it sometimes leads to intense flushing. And of course the PharmacoMafia could not make ridiculous profits with Niacin! Early varieties of timed release niacin were not as efficacious at reducing the flushing. More recently Flush-free or Non-flushing niacin has been available. Niacor ®, a prescription form of extended release niacin, is no better than the OTC Non-flush Niacins and Niacor has been reported to lead to a significant incidence of liver enzyme elevations and other problems. Indeed, even if you tolerate Niacin well, it is wise to have liver enzymes checked at 6 months and yearly thereafter. C. > > Hi Bee, > > +++I dont doubt the facts about lung cancer or niacine that you are presenting, but I was a smoker myself and I am a bit concerned that you answer on the question " Do cigarettes contain toxins " with positive ingredients...what I used to cough up in the mornings wanst healthy, and the hormonal imbalance when I stopped the smoking surely not too... > BR Tini > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hi Axel, Sugar causes all cells in the body to ferment, even blood cells, which is why bugs are created in the body, i.e. viruses, bacteria, candida, cancer, etc. to feed off of the sugars. Fermentation is what happens when beer, wine, etc. are made which creates bugs that feed off the sugars changing them into alcohol. The same thing happens in your own body. You must have cellular health in order for your body to detoxify itself, take in nutrients, water, etc. and to get rid of their own waste products no matter what toxins are around. So in my opinion sugars are much worse than smoking. Smoking doesn't cause fermentation of the body's cells even IF it is toxic. Here's a video that shows fermentation of red blood cells, which is a Live blood cell analysis by Dr. Young: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3oleKrSCwc & feature=related Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hei , thanks for the post! I especially like the link between mitochondrial dysfunction and nicotine, as mitochondrial dysfunction is currently a hot topic in many neurodegenerative diseases (my research group is working on them). I just hope that everyone reads the infos, as I really think in a board which is supposed (and does!) bring health into peoples life shouldnt support smoking. Sorry to hear about your family, it is so bad, especially when they cant stop even though they know already that its game over... All the best!! Tini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hi Tini, Did I say I support smoking? No I don't. I just want people to get the truth instead of all of the false information out there. I still stand by what I wrote in spite of information from and you. Smoking may be toxic, but it doesn't go into the actual makeup of the body's cells. If your cells are healthy even toxins in smoke cannot harm you since your body would be very efficient detoxifying itself right away like my body does. Also during normal metabolism the body has to get rid of wastes and by-products all the time, so it doesn't just need efficient detoxification to get rid of toxins in the air or consumed. Bee > > Hei , > > thanks for the post! I especially like the link between mitochondrial dysfunction and nicotine, as mitochondrial dysfunction is currently a hot topic in many neurodegenerative diseases (my research group is working on them). I just hope that everyone reads the infos, as I really think in a board which is supposed (and does!) bring health into peoples life shouldnt support smoking. > Sorry to hear about your family, it is so bad, especially when they cant stop even though they know already that its game over... > > All the best!! > > Tini > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hi Bee Yikes, your first paragraph shocked me! I don't recall you having explained it exactly that way. The video is excellent too. Thanks ! Susie > > Hi Axel, > Sugar causes all cells in the body to ferment, even blood cells, which is why bugs are created in the body, i.e. viruses, bacteria, candida, cancer, etc. to feed off of the sugars. > > Fermentation is what happens when beer, wine, etc. are made which creates bugs that feed off the sugars changing them into alcohol. The same thing happens in your own body. > > You must have cellular health in order for your body to detoxify itself, take in nutrients, water, etc. and to get rid of their own waste products no matter what toxins are around. > > So in my opinion sugars are much worse than smoking. Smoking doesn't cause fermentation of the body's cells even IF it is toxic. > > Here's a video that shows fermentation of red blood cells, which is a Live blood cell analysis by Dr. Young: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3oleKrSCwc & feature=related > > Bee > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 > > > > Hi Axel, > > Sugar causes all cells in the body to ferment, even blood cells, which is why bugs are created in the body, i.e. viruses, bacteria, candida, cancer, etc. to feed off of the sugars. > > > > Fermentation is what happens when beer, wine, etc. are made which creates bugs that feed off the sugars changing them into alcohol. The same thing happens in your own body. > > > > You must have cellular health in order for your body to detoxify itself, take in nutrients, water, etc. and to get rid of their own waste products no matter what toxins are around. > > > > So in my opinion sugars are much worse than smoking. Smoking doesn't cause fermentation of the body's cells even IF it is toxic. > > > > Here's a video that shows fermentation of red blood cells, which is a Live blood cell analysis by Dr. Young: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3oleKrSCwc & feature=related > > > > Bee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Bee, I copied, pasted & sent that paragraph to you-know-who, my diabetic daughter. She replied " ohhhh gross. " Yes, her red cells are fermenting in sugar & she didn't like the idea. Will send her the video tonight. Susie xoxo > > Hi Bee > > Yikes, your first paragraph shocked me! I don't recall you having explained it exactly that way. The video is excellent too. > > +++Hi Susie my friend, > I'm learning all of the time, and getting that video from a friend when I got back from vacation made it all very clear to me. > > Hooray for all of us when we get the truth, eh? > > Take good care Susie girl. > > Lotsa Luv & Hugs, Bee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 > > Bee, I copied, pasted & sent that paragraph to you-know-who, my diabetic daughter. She replied " ohhhh gross. " Yes, her red cells are fermenting in sugar & she didn't like the idea. Will send her the video tonight. +++Hi Susie, I hope she " gets it " now! I'm crossing my fingers! xoxo Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 > > Hi Tini, > Did I say I support smoking? No I don't. I just want people to get the truth instead of all of the false information out there. I still stand by what I wrote in spite of information from and you. > > Smoking may be toxic, but it doesn't go into the actual makeup of the body's cells. @@ Snip @@ Hi Bee, Tini, and Susie, Just thought I'd chime in and mention my grandfather smoked until he was 90 and died @ 94 and my great grandfather smoked a pipe all his life and lived in good health till 105 yrs old. As one can see, smoking did not slow these guys down ;-] There are plenty of examples of this in our society, I'm sure. I'm in agreement with Bee in regards to sugar should be addressed before the smoking and is much more the concern. Here, let me share an observation, I'm certain most have witnessed. Ever see someone quit smoking or quit? Ever notice how their appetite increases? Notice how the cravings for carbohydrates goes way up? Therefore, it makes sense to get the " Carb addiction " under control first. Why? Well, smoking may be connected to lung problems, however " Sugar " is connected to a plethora of diseases throughout the body. Including Cancers, Multiple sclerosis, Arthritis, Osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease ... etc. Get the idea. Makes smoking look like a cakewalk in regards to the destructiveness of the two issues in question. Review the link below,as a reminder of this regard. 146 Reasons Why Sugar Is Ruining Your Health http://rheumatic.org/sugar.htm So while the data , chemistry, theories submitted was intriguing ( and much appreciated ) it doesn't change the fact that Sugar/Carbs does far more extensive and reaching damage than Smoking imposes on the body. Something to take into consideration, perhaps P.S - Welcome back, Bee. Cordially, Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 http://www.forces.org/evidence/hamilton/other/oldest.htm <http://www.forces.org/evidence/hamilton/other/oldest.htm> Indeed, " There are plenty of examples of this in our society... " --Ken ................................................................ > > > > Hi Tini, > > Did I say I support smoking? No I don't. I just want people to get the truth instead of all of the false information out there. I still stand by what I wrote in spite of information from and you. > > > > Smoking may be toxic, but it doesn't go into the actual makeup of the body's cells. > > > @@ Snip > > @@ Hi Bee, Tini, and Susie, > > Just thought I'd chime in and mention my grandfather smoked until he was 90 and died @ 94 and my great grandfather smoked a pipe all his life and lived in good health till 105 yrs old. As one can see, smoking did not slow these guys down ;-] > > There are plenty of examples of this in our society, I'm sure. > > I'm in agreement with Bee in regards to sugar should be addressed before the smoking and is much more the concern. Here, let me share an observation, I'm certain most have witnessed. > > Ever see someone quit smoking or quit? Ever notice how their appetite increases? Notice how the cravings for carbohydrates goes way up? > > Therefore, it makes sense to get the " Carb addiction " under control first. Why? Well, smoking may be connected to lung problems, however " Sugar " is connected to a plethora of diseases throughout the body. Including Cancers, Multiple sclerosis, Arthritis, Osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease ... etc. > > Get the idea. Makes smoking look like a cakewalk in regards to the destructiveness of the two issues in question. > > Review the link below,as a reminder of this regard. > > 146 Reasons Why Sugar Is Ruining Your Health > http://rheumatic.org/sugar.htm > > So while the data , chemistry, theories submitted was intriguing > ( and much appreciated ) it doesn't change the fact that Sugar/Carbs does far more extensive and reaching damage than Smoking imposes on the body. Something to take into consideration, perhaps > > P.S - Welcome back, Bee. > > Cordially, > Ed > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 3, 2010 Report Share Posted June 3, 2010 Hei Ed, > @@ Hi Bee, Tini, and Susie, > > Just thought I'd chime in and mention my grandfather smoked until he was 90 and died @ 94 and my great grandfather smoked a pipe all his life and lived in good health till 105 yrs old. As one can see, smoking did not slow these guys down ;-] There are examples, my granny was also told to have good lung function until she developed cancer close to the end, and she used to be our example, as all my family was smoking...I just think it doesnt proof much, as my grandaunt is 91, swims every day and dances still and eats tons of cake, even though she has diabetes type 2;) I just think it is wrong to tell someone who asks if it ok to smoke or whether smoke contains toxins that cigarettes contain niacin which is good for the body...especially when it is wrong. I cant surely say that it is better than sugar, I just know that both are addictive and destructive and wanted to make that clear, as the question was if its ok to smoke (from axel). I mean were not supposed to BBQ our meat because of toxins in the charcoal, so it was totally ununderstandable, thats all. Anyway, have a nice day! Tini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 > > Hei Ed, > > @@ Snip > > There are examples, my granny was also told to have good lung function until she developed cancer close to the end, and she used to be our example, as all my family was smoking...I just think it doesnt proof much, as my grandaunt is 91, swims every day and dances still and eats tons of cake, even though she has diabetes type 2;) > > I just think it is wrong to tell someone who asks if it ok to smoke or whether smoke contains toxins that cigarettes contain niacin which is good for the body...especially when it is wrong. I cant surely say that it is better than sugar, I just know that both are addictive and destructive and wanted to make that clear, as the question was if its ok to smoke (from axel). I mean were not supposed to BBQ our meat because of toxins in the charcoal, so it was totally ununderstandable, thats all. > @@ Snip @@ Hi Tini, I agree and understand that smoking is not healthy. Your other points are also duly noted. However, what you demonstrated with your great aunt, is the power of exercise. I neglected to mention both my grandfather and great grandfather were active all their lives too. Moreover, they're all from the same era, which I will elaborate a little more on. Exercise can stave off disease for quite awhile. Probably being it enhances detoxification, improves the psychological and physical well being and also boosts the immune system, among other variables. " Thus, the people of our grandparents era were more active, had better overall community, better quality food and water, and they weren't as exposed to the negative and toxic variables as we are today. " Hint , above, in regards to your great aunt developing Diabetes in her old age rather that a young age and your granny with cancer. Moreover, that is more than likely why those people of that era developed the serious diseases more in their old age, rather than in their young lives. Unlike young people, today, whom already have their health degenerating long before old age due to the overall poor quality of lifestyles people have today is comparison to yesteryear. Nevertheless, my point was if one was consuming carbs/sugar and smoking. Then when comparing the two ( Sugar & Smoking) ... both done in moderation, Sugar will trump Smoking quicker in the short & long-term damage it can instigate on the body overall. And by a good margin, I might add. Basically, if your deficient in nutrients, sleep, exercise ...etc in conjunction with Smoking, then you are going to deteriorate a lot faster than just " Smoking " alone. This perhaps is why Bee was emphasizing addressing the Sugar/Carbs concern first, rather than the Smoking issue. Thus , the person addresses each issue according to priority , instead of tackling everything at once . Which could result in the person becoming frustrated and ceasing to address either problem. However she was erroneous in stating " nicotine is niacin " are the same. They chemically are not, accordingly. Tini , everyone including Bee, makes mistakes. To error is to be human ;-] Albeit, she does not tell Axel, she supports smoking or for him to light up a cigarette either. Anyway, you to have a nice day and thanks for the exchange. Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 HEi Ed, > Basically, if your deficient in nutrients, sleep, exercise ...etc in conjunction with Smoking, then you are going to deteriorate a lot faster than just " Smoking " alone. I agree 100% The whole lifestyle plays in, so scary to see that I used to be a non-sporty fast-food-eating and smoking person with too many drinks on the weekends... > Tini , everyone including Bee, makes mistakes. To error is to be human ;-] Hehe maybe thats why I was so stunned, as it seems impossible This program forced me to rethink so many thinks (hehe obviously successful) so that I stopped rechecking the presenting facts as it works so nicely, and Bee became my leading warrior towards health I think I am just afraid that people could " swallow " this info as well, thats why I felt I needed to clear it up...but I hope everyone on this group cares too much about his/her health anyways to smoke, I mean thats what we are here for...luckily!! > Anyway, you to have a nice day and thanks for the exchange. thank you too! BR Tini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Hi Tini, It IS a fact that tobacco contains niacin just like all other green plants do. There is nothing that is in tobacco that is unique or toxic. I'm sorry you've gotten so much false information about it. Bee > > Hei Ed, > > > > @@ Hi Bee, Tini, and Susie, > > > > Just thought I'd chime in and mention my grandfather smoked until he was 90 and died @ 94 and my great grandfather smoked a pipe all his life and lived in good health till 105 yrs old. As one can see, smoking did not slow these guys down ;-] > > There are examples, my granny was also told to have good lung function until she developed cancer close to the end, and she used to be our example, as all my family was smoking...I just think it doesnt proof much, as my grandaunt is 91, swims every day and dances still and eats tons of cake, even though she has diabetes type 2;) > > I just think it is wrong to tell someone who asks if it ok to smoke or whether smoke contains toxins that cigarettes contain niacin which is good for the body...especially when it is wrong. I cant surely say that it is better than sugar, I just know that both are addictive and destructive and wanted to make that clear, as the question was if its ok to smoke (from axel). I mean were not supposed to BBQ our meat because of toxins in the charcoal, so it was totally ununderstandable, thats all. > > Anyway, have a nice day! > > Tini > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Sorry Ed, but nicotine and niacin are the same, however " they " don't want you to know the truth, so they've shrouded it in all kinds of jingo lingo to confuse everyone, by even changing definitions and words, etc. Why would all green plants contain niacin and yet tobacco all by itself contain a different substance? It is only logical they wouldn't be different substances. This is how " they " get control over us in many areas, not just about tobacco and smoking, so they can remove more and more of our freedom, and add more and more laws to control us! Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 > > Sorry Ed, but nicotine and niacin are the same, however " they " don't want you to know the truth, so they've shrouded it in all kinds of jingo lingo to confuse everyone, by even changing definitions and words, etc. > > Why would all green plants contain niacin and yet tobacco all by itself contain a different substance? It is only logical they wouldn't be different substances. > > This is how " they " get control over us in many areas, not just about tobacco and smoking, so they can remove more and more of our freedom, and add more and more laws to control us! > > Bee > Hi Bee, Thank you for your response. However, I too assumed Niacin and Nicotine were the same although the chemical and scientific data below proves otherwise. --------------------------------------------------------------- Nicotine's molecular structure: http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Nicotine/ Nicotine's chemical formula is C10H14N2 Niacin's various molecular structures: http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/vitamins/niacin/forms.html Niacin's chemical formula is C5H4NCOOH (or alternatively, C6H6NO2 ) http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Nicotinic_acid ---------------------------------------------------------------- Notice the chemical formulas are different from one another ,as well as the molecular diagrams are similar but NOT entirely the same. Actually Niacin (also known as nicotinamide and nicotinic acid ) will compete with Nicotine. One of the ways by which Nicotine causes detrimental effects in humans is that it has a similar structure to nicotinamide/Niacin and can interfere with the absorption and incorporation of the vitamin Niacin/B3. Scroll down to " Relationship between Nicotinamide and Nicotine.... for referenced info. Link below. http://www.stanford.edu/group/hopes/treatmts/ebuffer/j3.html Something that is worth noting, although Niacin and Nicotine may be present and interact with the same structure i.e vegetables/plants, tobacco ... they have different effects and results. Niacin & Nicotine are two separate chemicals. This reminds me of how synonymous Vitamin C and Sugar are and how they similarly compete with each other in the body. However , they both to, have very different effects and results. Therefore , if there is more Niacin than Nicotine available the Nicotine gets canceled out and vice versa. Tobacco seems to have both chemical Nicotine and Niacin as other plants do in varying degrees. Nicotine is a poison and a defense for the plant. Niacin is not. This is why I take a Niacin supplement and not a Nicotine supplement. ;-] Off topic but related to information sources and noteworthy is utilizing " Wikipedia " as one's reference of information. Be careful, its not a dependable quality source for information. See below why! The Great Lie of Wikipedia: " the....encyclopedia that anyone can edit. " http://whale.to/a/wikipedia.html Lastly, Bee I do agree governments, Big Pharma industries and powerful wealthy people manipulate all sectors of our global society. This is why people like you and I have to research and sort out the information. Granted, its definitely , not easy my friend :-) Thanks for being such a true humanitarian and continuing to share your hard research and experience. Cordially, Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 4, 2010 Report Share Posted June 4, 2010 Hei Bee, please go to Wikipedia and check the structures. or show me ANY proof of the wild theory that nicotin is Vitamin B3. Otherwise I really loose my trust in all facts you present. And please no " anagram theory " , I mean something which proofs your thesis, as obviously there has to be something, right? BR Tini > > Sorry Ed, but nicotine and niacin are the same, however " they " don't want you to know the truth, so they've shrouded it in all kinds of jingo lingo to confuse everyone, by even changing definitions and words, etc. > > Why would all green plants contain niacin and yet tobacco all by itself contain a different substance? It is only logical they wouldn't be different substances. > > This is how " they " get control over us in many areas, not just about tobacco and smoking, so they can remove more and more of our freedom, and add more and more laws to control us! > > Bee > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.