Guest guest Posted April 14, 2000 Report Share Posted April 14, 2000 I wondered this too> My husband's parents are both O's and he is an A.....uh oh could this be the way to find out if someone has been fooling around?.......lol genes > Somewhere on these lists I have read that we receive two genes, one > from each parent and that type A and B are dominant genes. So, if our > parents are type A and type O, and one parent is OO and the other is AO, > we might receive an O from each parent and be an O or an A from one and > an O from the other and be an A. This information was interesting and > led me to wonder. Then, yesterday I was visiting with a friend who is a > nurse by training. She is an O, her partner is an O, and their three > children are two O's and one A! If the A gene were dominant, neither > she nor her husband have it as they are both O's, so the question is > where did the A gene come from? Does this de-bunk this theory? > Frances > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get paid for the stuff you know! > Get answers for the stuff you don't. And get $10 to spend on the site! > 1/2200/5/_/473523/_/955716747/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > You are receiving this email because you elected to subscribe to the mailing list. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 2, 2004 Report Share Posted March 2, 2004 Dear Lori and Samterites We got into an interesting debate- I didnt realize you where going for genetic councelling for breast cancer.Should I assume you have it (sorry)or trying to avoid it? There is a theory that a condition that is considered genetic in origin could be due to poor nutrition in earlier generations. There is no say that the disease in question is curable within a generation (unless we submit ourselves to genetic engineering medicine/cloned tissue etc...yuk)but yes, it can be controlled through diet/supplements/medicine. However I do beleive Genetic predisposition AND environmental provocation can summarize why diseases like Samters (and others ) suddenly erupt. This might be very relevant in terms of prevention ie My Grandmother has breast cancer,My mother had it,so I probably have the Gene that predisposes me to have it.Does it mean I will have it 100% or can I avoid it with right diet / min environmental toxic exposure/ radiation/Chemical detoxification etc.. I Hope so but who knows.It is becoming more and more of a challenge in the 21st century especially now with GM crops etc.. Consequenses of living in a 'fallen' world! > Chrstine, didn't see your whole message, just a bit about the uninherited > genes. I didn't actually say we don't inherit our genes, but that the > syndrome might not be directly inherited. Meaning that someone in your > family doesn't have to have it for you to get it. Also, there are > spontaneous mutations so the genes themselves do not have to be directly > inherited, although most of them probably are. > > People in some families may have components of Samters. In my family, for > instance, my mother and her mother are allergic to aspirin. My father had > nasal polyps. None have Samters > > I hope this helps ... genetics can be very confusing. I have been studying > it a lot lately to try to understand about the breast cancer gene before I > go for genetic counseling. It's definitely not what I learned in high > school biology about genes back in the old days! : ) Never did understand > how I got green eyes anyway except that they must be " recessive " or my > father was the milk man. But unfortunately dominant and recessive genes is > a very basic understanding of something that's so much more complex and I > certainly can't explain it very well > > > > Lori Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 In a message dated 7/10/04 3:05:22 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > It a Gene's fault that some of us are fat, Its a > genes fault some of us are anorexic. It's a genes > fault that some of us are diabetic. It's a genes fault > that some of us are addicted to cigarettes or alcohol. > It's a genes fault some of us lose hair. I think we > should just look at everything that ails us and ask > the Drug Co's to find what gene to blame The danger in this theory, which I believe is total utter nonsense and pure B.S. is that there will come a time when those who are genetically defective will have to be eliminated - just as they did inthe Third Reich with their Eugenic program. Blind Reason (a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue) Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's Unsafe at Any Dose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2004 Report Share Posted July 10, 2004 In a message dated 7/10/04 3:05:22 AM Mountain Daylight Time, SSRI medications writes: > It a Gene's fault that some of us are fat, Its a > genes fault some of us are anorexic. It's a genes > fault that some of us are diabetic. It's a genes fault > that some of us are addicted to cigarettes or alcohol. > It's a genes fault some of us lose hair. I think we > should just look at everything that ails us and ask > the Drug Co's to find what gene to blame The danger in this theory, which I believe is total utter nonsense and pure B.S. is that there will come a time when those who are genetically defective will have to be eliminated - just as they did inthe Third Reich with their Eugenic program. Blind Reason (a novel of espionage and pharmaceutical intrigue) Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's Unsafe at Any Dose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 In a message dated 7/11/04 4:41:53 AM Romance Standard Time, psycottish@... writes: > > .... My comments were ment to be sarcastic..... > > I was put on Effexor to help me deal with my sons > problems with his meds. My doc wanted me to up the > dose, but when I started to think my son would be > better off without me, I looked up the info on Effexor > and weened myself off. I have had my own problems, but > they pail in comparison to my sons. Maybe there is a > gene that makes some people more prone to depression, > and maybe it is the environment where they find > themselves. > > maggs > > > > > > yes and thank God you can see it also could be the medicine making you feel that way. Which is so often the case. These medications have the ability to cause VERY negative behaviors. This seems to be a slight imposition to those making money but it certainly isn't for the kids sitting in jail cells all over the country, or the parents who are in just as much pain. Sadly I see what these drugs are really doing. One girl had just come out of a coma from attempting suicide chemically, only to go home and shoot herself in the chest hoping to finish herself off. She didn't. This has to do with death, not genes. Even still in clinical testing this should have been determined long before they started giving them to everyone. Reading about your child literally breaks my heart and I am glad you are still here with them and for them. Marhoefer Miracles Of Hope Network® New York City~Chicago~Hollywood~Paris " Isn't it the impossible that makes a miracle, a miracle......... " ®2004 <A HREF= " www.miracles-of-hope.com " >www.miracles-of-hope.com</A> The Defense Foundation for children USA ~Changing The Destiny Of A Child ~ Obstruction-Of-Injustice Media & Productions® Touch the Thunder Publishing & Recording Company <A HREF= " www.on-air-live-radio.tv " >www.on-air-live-radio.tv</A> ::justice in media:: " Sometimes instead of leveling the playing field, you just have to buy the field " DM2004® Those who support our efforts and events <A HREF= " mailto:media@... " >media@...</A> receive a celebrity autographed gift Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2004 Report Share Posted July 11, 2004 In a message dated 7/11/04 4:41:53 AM Romance Standard Time, psycottish@... writes: > > .... My comments were ment to be sarcastic..... > > I was put on Effexor to help me deal with my sons > problems with his meds. My doc wanted me to up the > dose, but when I started to think my son would be > better off without me, I looked up the info on Effexor > and weened myself off. I have had my own problems, but > they pail in comparison to my sons. Maybe there is a > gene that makes some people more prone to depression, > and maybe it is the environment where they find > themselves. > > maggs > > > > > > yes and thank God you can see it also could be the medicine making you feel that way. Which is so often the case. These medications have the ability to cause VERY negative behaviors. This seems to be a slight imposition to those making money but it certainly isn't for the kids sitting in jail cells all over the country, or the parents who are in just as much pain. Sadly I see what these drugs are really doing. One girl had just come out of a coma from attempting suicide chemically, only to go home and shoot herself in the chest hoping to finish herself off. She didn't. This has to do with death, not genes. Even still in clinical testing this should have been determined long before they started giving them to everyone. Reading about your child literally breaks my heart and I am glad you are still here with them and for them. Marhoefer Miracles Of Hope Network® New York City~Chicago~Hollywood~Paris " Isn't it the impossible that makes a miracle, a miracle......... " ®2004 <A HREF= " www.miracles-of-hope.com " >www.miracles-of-hope.com</A> The Defense Foundation for children USA ~Changing The Destiny Of A Child ~ Obstruction-Of-Injustice Media & Productions® Touch the Thunder Publishing & Recording Company <A HREF= " www.on-air-live-radio.tv " >www.on-air-live-radio.tv</A> ::justice in media:: " Sometimes instead of leveling the playing field, you just have to buy the field " DM2004® Those who support our efforts and events <A HREF= " mailto:media@... " >media@...</A> receive a celebrity autographed gift Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, SSRI medications writes: > But to deny that so-called > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > existence of genes. > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. " Blind Reason " a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's Unsafe At Any Dose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, SSRI medications writes: > But to deny that so-called > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > existence of genes. > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. " Blind Reason " a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's Unsafe At Any Dose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 Flus are caused by viruses. We know what causes them. We don't know what causes " mental illnesses " except for the ones that can be related directly to brain trauma -- strokes, brain damage. We do know that certain things run in families, even when the children are not raised by their natural parents or even know their natural parents so they couldn't have " learned " to have these disorders. A genetic predisposition is probably the only logical explanation considering there are some disorders which are clearly -- and easily -- identified with genetic test. I am unaware that anyone discovered that alcoholism isn't a genetic disorder for some families. They might not have identified the specific gene(s) involved, but no one has discovered that no genes are involved. The research in genetics is no where near far enough along to rule out the likelihood that it is gene related. > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > But to deny that so-called > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > existence of genes. > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 Flus are caused by viruses. We know what causes them. We don't know what causes " mental illnesses " except for the ones that can be related directly to brain trauma -- strokes, brain damage. We do know that certain things run in families, even when the children are not raised by their natural parents or even know their natural parents so they couldn't have " learned " to have these disorders. A genetic predisposition is probably the only logical explanation considering there are some disorders which are clearly -- and easily -- identified with genetic test. I am unaware that anyone discovered that alcoholism isn't a genetic disorder for some families. They might not have identified the specific gene(s) involved, but no one has discovered that no genes are involved. The research in genetics is no where near far enough along to rule out the likelihood that it is gene related. > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > But to deny that so-called > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > existence of genes. > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 Well that is true but no one has proved a lot of things, like that genes have anything to do with mental illness. It's a BS line being fed to everyone. I don't mind if you believe it and it is very seductive, it " appears " to make sense, hell it might be true, though I really doubt it. The thing is scientists don't know, they are lying if they say they do. They " think " it " appears " to be this or that gene. Read the literature, it's a ruse. They are sincerely looking and I'm sure they are researching for the love of research, I'm not saying every researcher is a liar, but I am saying that any psychiatrist that tells you it's a genetic thing is completely full of it and leads me to wonder what else they have lied about, like Paxil is good, Zoloft is good, mental illness is a chemical imbalance, all of these are promotional lines, not truth. Hell a bottle of whiskey might be a safer bet, just don't drive. Dr. Breeding helped get a law passed that allows parents to refuse any psych test or treatment for their child in Texas. The arguement was simple, there is not proof that mental illness is a physical thing and so there is no proof that these harsh drugs are the solution. Dr. Breeding said to the legislative committee looking this thing over " what we have is a belief system in bio-psychiatry and all we are asking is that the parents that do the research on the drug and then decide it's not in the best interest of the child be allowed to have their own beliefs concerning this issue " I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist. They talked to the psych's pushing against parents rights, the psych's couldn't lie about it. It's a belief system, period. If it works for you, great. Remember, it's a theory. There are a lot of good reasons that it looks like genes play a role, but behaviors are learned also, like I said before, they started out claiming one gene causes manic depression(the old Bi-polar) and they had to eat crow, then they started saying it was multiple genes, now they are saying it's multiple genes and the environment. They are looking in the direction that they think is the correct direction. that's all the research is doing. Some genius will have to come along and think outside the box before they find the real cause. Just because it's not been proven yet doesn't mean they will prove it. I'm telling you, go to the library and research old genetic psych press. It's all " WE FOUND IT " but they haven't yet, the press turns it into a fact when it is not once you look over the research. Speculation at best. Jim Flus are caused by viruses. We know what causes them. We don't know what causes " mental illnesses " except for the ones that can be related directly to brain trauma -- strokes, brain damage. We do know that certain things run in families, even when the children are not raised by their natural parents or even know their natural parents so they couldn't have " learned " to have these disorders. A genetic predisposition is probably the only logical explanation considering there are some disorders which are clearly -- and easily -- identified with genetic test. I am unaware that anyone discovered that alcoholism isn't a genetic disorder for some families. They might not have identified the specific gene(s) involved, but no one has discovered that no genes are involved. The research in genetics is no where near far enough along to rule out the likelihood that it is gene related. > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > But to deny that so-called > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > existence of genes. > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 Well that is true but no one has proved a lot of things, like that genes have anything to do with mental illness. It's a BS line being fed to everyone. I don't mind if you believe it and it is very seductive, it " appears " to make sense, hell it might be true, though I really doubt it. The thing is scientists don't know, they are lying if they say they do. They " think " it " appears " to be this or that gene. Read the literature, it's a ruse. They are sincerely looking and I'm sure they are researching for the love of research, I'm not saying every researcher is a liar, but I am saying that any psychiatrist that tells you it's a genetic thing is completely full of it and leads me to wonder what else they have lied about, like Paxil is good, Zoloft is good, mental illness is a chemical imbalance, all of these are promotional lines, not truth. Hell a bottle of whiskey might be a safer bet, just don't drive. Dr. Breeding helped get a law passed that allows parents to refuse any psych test or treatment for their child in Texas. The arguement was simple, there is not proof that mental illness is a physical thing and so there is no proof that these harsh drugs are the solution. Dr. Breeding said to the legislative committee looking this thing over " what we have is a belief system in bio-psychiatry and all we are asking is that the parents that do the research on the drug and then decide it's not in the best interest of the child be allowed to have their own beliefs concerning this issue " I'm paraphrasing but that's the gist. They talked to the psych's pushing against parents rights, the psych's couldn't lie about it. It's a belief system, period. If it works for you, great. Remember, it's a theory. There are a lot of good reasons that it looks like genes play a role, but behaviors are learned also, like I said before, they started out claiming one gene causes manic depression(the old Bi-polar) and they had to eat crow, then they started saying it was multiple genes, now they are saying it's multiple genes and the environment. They are looking in the direction that they think is the correct direction. that's all the research is doing. Some genius will have to come along and think outside the box before they find the real cause. Just because it's not been proven yet doesn't mean they will prove it. I'm telling you, go to the library and research old genetic psych press. It's all " WE FOUND IT " but they haven't yet, the press turns it into a fact when it is not once you look over the research. Speculation at best. Jim Flus are caused by viruses. We know what causes them. We don't know what causes " mental illnesses " except for the ones that can be related directly to brain trauma -- strokes, brain damage. We do know that certain things run in families, even when the children are not raised by their natural parents or even know their natural parents so they couldn't have " learned " to have these disorders. A genetic predisposition is probably the only logical explanation considering there are some disorders which are clearly -- and easily -- identified with genetic test. I am unaware that anyone discovered that alcoholism isn't a genetic disorder for some families. They might not have identified the specific gene(s) involved, but no one has discovered that no genes are involved. The research in genetics is no where near far enough along to rule out the likelihood that it is gene related. > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > SSRI medications writes: > > > > But to deny that so-called > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > existence of genes. > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that it was > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T genetic but > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis for > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame what they don't > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you say that you > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in your > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > " Blind Reason " > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 I really don't listen much to psychiatrists. I don't consider what psychiatrist do or say to be science. I listen to the scientist doing the brain and genetic research. They aren't psychiatrist. I have little time for the vast majority of psychiatrists. Nor do I believe that most of what we call " mental illness " is psychologically related. I believe we will find most " mental illnesses " are neurological disorders -- brain malfunctioning. There will be mulitple causes for these brain malfunctionings, some of which will be related to genes. Some will be physical trauma like injuries. Some will be related to toxins in the environment, illnesses, strokes, diet, etc. We can already correlate specific actions and thoughts to activity in particular spots in the brain. Now if only we knew what all those drugs do to the brain. > > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > > SSRI medications writes: > > > > > > > But to deny that so-called > > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > > existence of genes. > > > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that > it was > > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T > genetic but > > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis > for > > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame > what they don't > > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you > say that you > > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in > your > > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > > > > " Blind Reason " > > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2005 Report Share Posted January 29, 2005 I really don't listen much to psychiatrists. I don't consider what psychiatrist do or say to be science. I listen to the scientist doing the brain and genetic research. They aren't psychiatrist. I have little time for the vast majority of psychiatrists. Nor do I believe that most of what we call " mental illness " is psychologically related. I believe we will find most " mental illnesses " are neurological disorders -- brain malfunctioning. There will be mulitple causes for these brain malfunctionings, some of which will be related to genes. Some will be physical trauma like injuries. Some will be related to toxins in the environment, illnesses, strokes, diet, etc. We can already correlate specific actions and thoughts to activity in particular spots in the brain. Now if only we knew what all those drugs do to the brain. > > In a message dated 1/29/05 6:26:00 PM Mountain Standard Time, > > SSRI medications writes: > > > > > > > But to deny that so-called > > > " disorders " can have genetic basis is tantamount to denying the > > > existence of genes. > > > > > They tried this with alcoholism. Came out and said pointblank that > it was > > genetic. Oh, but a few months later they discovered that it WASN'T > genetic but > > they never made that announcement to the public. The genetic basis > for > > illness is just one more straw they are trying to grasp to blame > what they don't > > understand on the person themselves. If you get the flu, would you > say that you > > were genetically predisposed to getting the flu because so-and-so in > your > > family had had the flu???? It's all b.s. Truly it is. > > > > > > " Blind Reason " > > a novel of pharmaceutical intrigue > > Think your antidepressant is safe? Think again. It's > > Unsafe At Any Dose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 No. I don't know anything about mutated genes. I've heard of damage to the DNA; that might be permanent but maybe also a scare story designed to sell medical services. Really, my point is that we don't have to stay sick if we can avoid the poisons such as RF, inorganic metals in teeth & elsewhere, synthetic hormones, carbohydrates etc. Maybe impossible, but a reduction in poisons has had marvellous results for many. > > > > I read that we need not suffer the action of a gene, because they > can > > be switched on/off at will. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2007 Report Share Posted September 6, 2007 If you're born with a mutated gene it's probably going to stay that way, but it is true that whether a gene is expressed depends on all kinds of other factors. Our DNA is constantly being damaged in our cells (e.g., by UV light, but also probably microwave exposure). Most of these can be and are repaired. Those cells that get too much damage to fix may intentionally die, or can become cancerous. Note that the repair systems are designed to cope with damage from UV (within reason--stay out of tanning beds) and may be less efficient at fixing the double stranded breaks reported for microwave exposure. Bill On 9/5/07, asurisuk <asurisuk@...> wrote: > > Are you also saying that a gene that has mutated, can return to > normal, given the right conditions? > > > > > > > > > > ,Perhaps there is a gene that gets switched on which sets the > > whole process > > > of sensitivity in motion due to an emf trauma/chemical event > > further > > > reinforced by phychological stress event at the same time.or > > viceverser..? Perhaps > > > the gene was once of some pertinant use a throwback of the > > earliest vertabral > > > ansestors. If this were the case then it is not so easy to > switch > > this ghost > > > gene off ! > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Genes must have something to do with how a person will live life. I know now that nutrition has a LOT to do with it, but both my grandma & grandpa lived until about 90 years old and neither of them ever had any health problems. I don't think either of them had a lot of processed sugar but they ate fruits, fruit juices, meats, veggies, potatoes, and the occassional cookies & cakes. Both of them died of natural causes as well. My grandma just died in her sleep, and her health was fine just prior to her passing. I dunno. Seems like science can't explain away everything all of the time. Like the old thing about bumble bees and how their wings shouldn't be able to lift the weight of their bodies but somehow it works? How does science explain that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 >> Genes must have something to do with how a person will live life. I know now that nutrition has a LOT to do with it, but both my grandma & grandpa lived until about 90 years old and neither of them ever had any health problems. I don't think either of them had a lot of processed sugar but they ate fruits, fruit juices, meats, veggies, potatoes, and the occassional cookies & cakes. > > Both of them died of natural causes as well. My grandma just died in her sleep, and her health was fine just prior to her passing. +++Hi . Having good genes is dependent upon the " nutritional status " a person acquires from their parents upon conception. The fact IS that " proper nutrition, " eliminating toxins and damaging foods also changes and corrects bad genes/DNA as proved by Dr. Weston A. Price in his book Nutrition and Physical Degeneration. +++Of course your grandparents didn't have the level of toxins and damaging foods we have today. The best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.