Guest guest Posted February 26, 2005 Report Share Posted February 26, 2005 Are you referring to ORGONE..Debbie > > > I remember seeing an email within the last month that addressed having > aluminum foil and a type of device, something like a DET machine that > help protect from outside EMF. > I looked through the archive for this month and couldn't find it. Does > anybody remember sending that email or have that info? > thanks, > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2005 Report Share Posted February 27, 2005 Speaking of Orgone, there are, according to Wilhelm Reich's own experiments with orgone boxes and other orgone devices, certain layering of materials, particularly metal layers in certain combinations of layers actually amplifies the harmful effects of inside and outisde EMF sources. So, do research that carefully unless you are willing to be a guinea pig in your own laboratory. I do not know what those harmful configurations are but that info is available. Tonio Not orgone. Someone was talking about what had to be done to your room or house to prevent wireless or some other outside EMF source from coming in. The suggestion was made to put aluminum foil up all around the room and also have some device on in the room that nuetralized or somehow contributed beneficial waves to help against the EMF. I thought it was called a DET device or machine. Sound familiar? If anybody has this info on a DET please forward it to me please. Thank you, andrew --- devorah91 <devorah888@...> wrote: > > Are you referring to ORGONE..Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA What is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you noticed any differences with it? Zoe > > _Click here: EMF Protection by EarthCalm: the most powerful protection > from man made EMFs and electro sensitivity available._ > (http://earthcalm.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=4) > > This site was recommended by a chap on OSR list that sees Klinghart in US, > less expensive than site here. > > I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA > > Mandi x > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 2, 2009 Report Share Posted August 2, 2009 In a message dated 02/08/2009 23:57:25 GMT Daylight Time, zoet@... writes: I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USAWhat is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you noticed any differences with it? >>Its from the Oxypowder people. I have had one for so long I can't remember the difference lol http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection I actually have 2 x Safe Space II and each room with a computer has Safe Space I which is more than I am supposed to need. I got them before I knew how dangerous EMF was Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Hi Mandi I have been reading all of the posts on EMF protection with great interest. Do you have wireless technology in your house or do you use cables to connect to the internet? We have just purchased corded telephones and chucked the microwave and we are looking to see what else we can do. Thanks > > > In a message dated 02/08/2009 23:57:25 GMT Daylight Time, > zoet@... writes: > > I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA > > What is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you > noticed any differences with it? > > > > >>Its from the Oxypowder people. I have had one for so long I can't > remember the difference lol > > _http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection_ > (http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection) > > I actually have 2 x Safe Space II and each room with a computer has Safe > Space I which is more than I am supposed to need. I got them before I knew > how dangerous EMF was > > Mandi x > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Hi    We opted for a wired broadband which is actually more effective than the wireless one, and of course have thrown out- via safe disposal at the local tip, all our low energy light bulbs too. Also keep all mobile phones downstairs away from any bedrooms too  Best wishes     Tracey On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:56 PM, tracy8793 <tracy.wootton1@...> wrote:  Hi MandiI have been reading all of the posts on EMF protection with great interest. Do you have wireless technology in your house or do you use cables to connect to the internet?We have just purchased corded telephones and chucked the microwave and we are looking to see what else we can do. Thanks >> > In a message dated 02/08/2009 23:57:25 GMT Daylight Time, > zoet@... writes:> > I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA> > What is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you > noticed any differences with it? > > > > >>Its from the Oxypowder people. I have had one for so long I can't > remember the difference lol> > _http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection_ > (http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection) > > I actually have 2 x Safe Space II and each room with a computer has Safe > Space I which is more than I am supposed to need. I got them before I knew > how dangerous EMF was > > Mandi x> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Hi    We opted for a wired broadband which is actually more effective than the wireless one, and of course have thrown out- via safe disposal at the local tip, all our low energy light bulbs too. Also keep all mobile phones downstairs away from any bedrooms too  Best wishes     Tracey On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:56 PM, tracy8793 <tracy.wootton1@...> wrote:  Hi MandiI have been reading all of the posts on EMF protection with great interest. Do you have wireless technology in your house or do you use cables to connect to the internet?We have just purchased corded telephones and chucked the microwave and we are looking to see what else we can do. Thanks >> > In a message dated 02/08/2009 23:57:25 GMT Daylight Time, > zoet@... writes:> > I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA> > What is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you > noticed any differences with it? > > > > >>Its from the Oxypowder people. I have had one for so long I can't > remember the difference lol> > _http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection_ > (http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection) > > I actually have 2 x Safe Space II and each room with a computer has Safe > Space I which is more than I am supposed to need. I got them before I knew > how dangerous EMF was > > Mandi x> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Hi    We opted for a wired broadband which is actually more effective than the wireless one, and of course have thrown out- via safe disposal at the local tip, all our low energy light bulbs too. Also keep all mobile phones downstairs away from any bedrooms too  Best wishes     Tracey On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:56 PM, tracy8793 <tracy.wootton1@...> wrote:  Hi MandiI have been reading all of the posts on EMF protection with great interest. Do you have wireless technology in your house or do you use cables to connect to the internet?We have just purchased corded telephones and chucked the microwave and we are looking to see what else we can do. Thanks >> > In a message dated 02/08/2009 23:57:25 GMT Daylight Time, > zoet@... writes:> > I use Safe Space 1 & 11 which I got from USA> > What is Safe Space Mandi? Does it do a similar job to EarthCalm? Have you > noticed any differences with it? > > > > >>Its from the Oxypowder people. I have had one for so long I can't > remember the difference lol> > _http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection_ > (http://www.ghchealth.com/radiation-protection) > > I actually have 2 x Safe Space II and each room with a computer has Safe > Space I which is more than I am supposed to need. I got them before I knew > how dangerous EMF was > > Mandi x> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Someone is pulling somene's leg with that " EMF protection system " and probably making a lot of money at it. The 60 Hz AC fields in your home are the least things you have to worry about. Radio frequency waves, especially those in the 2400 MHz range (microwave), are the most serious. This is the frequency range used by microwave ovens. These are used by a wide range of home and commercial devices these days. My spectrum analyzer, attached to a small antenna, shows constant signals in this part of the spectrum. It's pretty much impossible to screen these out. You're completely surrounded by cell phone towers, radio transmitters of various types, etc. You can't get your neighbors to stop using all the stuff. Unless you live out in the wilderness 25 miles from the nearest town and several miles from your nearest neighbor, you're going to be exposed to it. The only way you could avoid it would be to live in what is called a " Faraday cage. " But that is very expensive and you'd have to stay in it all the time. I wouldn't want to live a life like that. We were just discussing on a ham radio group I'm in that the prevalence of electronic devices that generate RF have raised the noise level a significant amount just about everywhere. Be glad that BPL (Broadband over Power Lines) hasn't been implemented too much yet. The idea is to use existing power lines to carry internet signals. Only power lines were not designed for this purpose and radiate most of it like antennas. Zack On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:10 AM, rachael.meehan <remeehan@...> wrote: > > > Dear All, Dear Bee, > > I'm trying to reduce my EMF; I've disconnected the cordless phones and > rarely use my cellular. Its been forefront on my mind for weeks now, and > todays mercola only made me act. What do any of you do? Bee is this > Earthcalm anything that you have an opinion on? > > http://www.emf-health.com/earthcalm-products.htm > > They also have the q=link personal device. Anyone have experience/opinions > with this? > > Many thanks. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 > > Dear All, Dear Bee, > > I'm trying to reduce my EMF; I've disconnected the cordless phones and rarely use my cellular. Its been forefront on my mind for weeks now, and todays mercola only made me act. What do any of you do? Bee is this Earthcalm anything that you have an opinion on? > > http://www.emf-health.com/earthcalm-products.htm > > They also have the q=link personal device. Anyone have experience/opinions with this? +++Hi . Does EMF particularly affect you, or do you " think " it is because of your symptoms? In any case, it helps anyone to reduce EMF exposure as much as possible. I was going to buy a regular old-type phone since I do a lot of phone consultations and only have a cordless one, but thankfully my Mother had an old one she gave me. Dr. Mercola sells ferrite beads that attach to your cell phone which lowers or eliminates EMF exposure. It is most important to lower EMF exposure while you are sleeping, so unplug lamps, electric alarm clock, or have them at least 4 feet away from your bed. Blocking electrical outlets with devices, especially in your bedroom, like those available at Earth Calm in the link above is also good. I believe there are less expensive ones than they sell, but I haven't researched it. Dr. Mercola suggests you shut off electrical breakers to your bedroom area while sleeping. Also do not use electric heating pads or the microwave. Minimize time spent on the computer, and locate TVs 4 feet away from where you sit. I have an LCD computer monitor that doesn't emit much EMF. It also helps to place your hard drive further away from you, which is dependent upon cord lengths. You'd get less exposure to hard drives if they are not right under your feet, and if there is some furniture between you and them, particularly a metal file cabinet. Also look in your area to see if you are close to any transformers or high-power lines. All the best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 > > Someone is pulling somene's leg with that " EMF protection system " and > probably making a lot of money at it. The 60 Hz AC fields in your home are > the least things you have to worry about. Radio frequency waves, especially > those in the 2400 MHz range (microwave), are the most serious. This is the > frequency range used by microwave ovens. These are used by a wide range of > home and commercial devices these days. My spectrum analyzer, attached to a > small antenna, shows constant signals in this part of the spectrum. > > It's pretty much impossible to screen these out. You're completely > surrounded by cell phone towers, radio transmitters of various types, etc. > You can't get your neighbors to stop using all the stuff. Unless you live > out in the wilderness 25 miles from the nearest town and several miles from > your nearest neighbor, you're going to be exposed to it. The only way you > could avoid it would be to live in what is called a " Faraday cage. " But that > is very expensive and you'd have to stay in it all the time. I wouldn't want > to live a life like that. > > We were just discussing on a ham radio group I'm in that the prevalence of > electronic devices that generate RF have raised the noise level a > significant amount just about everywhere. > Be glad that BPL (Broadband over Power Lines) hasn't been implemented too > much yet. The idea is to use existing power lines to carry internet signals. > Only power lines were not designed for this purpose and radiate most of it > like antennas. +++Hi Zack. Thanks for the lesson about EMF exposure. Do you think the ferrite beads Dr. Mercola sells help people using cell phones? Here's the link: http://tinyurl.com/55sn2b I personally believe Dr. Mercola tends to be an alarmist about a few things. The best, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Hi Bee and All, No, the ferrite beads are worthless. If they were effective, they would also make your phone useless. If someone is that concerned about it, I'd recommend just getting rid of the phone and trying to avoid areas where others nearby are using cell phones. And even then, as I said before, we are completely surrounded by cell phone towers in most places. If you have access to a cell phone signal in your area, you're bathed in the RF energy from a cell tower. I forgot to mention to those who don't know it, that I am an electrical engineer, specifically an RF/microwave/antenna engineer. Zack On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, beeisbuzzing2003 < beeisbuzzing2003@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Someone is pulling somene's leg with that " EMF protection system " and > > probably making a lot of money at it. The 60 Hz AC fields in your home > are > > the least things you have to worry about. Radio frequency waves, > especially > > those in the 2400 MHz range (microwave), are the most serious. This is > the > > frequency range used by microwave ovens. These are used by a wide range > of > > home and commercial devices these days. My spectrum analyzer, attached to > a > > small antenna, shows constant signals in this part of the spectrum. > > > > It's pretty much impossible to screen these out. You're completely > > surrounded by cell phone towers, radio transmitters of various types, > etc. > > You can't get your neighbors to stop using all the stuff. Unless you live > > out in the wilderness 25 miles from the nearest town and several miles > from > > your nearest neighbor, you're going to be exposed to it. The only way you > > could avoid it would be to live in what is called a " Faraday cage. " But > that > > is very expensive and you'd have to stay in it all the time. I wouldn't > want > > to live a life like that. > > > > We were just discussing on a ham radio group I'm in that the prevalence > of > > electronic devices that generate RF have raised the noise level a > > significant amount just about everywhere. > > Be glad that BPL (Broadband over Power Lines) hasn't been implemented too > > much yet. The idea is to use existing power lines to carry internet > signals. > > Only power lines were not designed for this purpose and radiate most of > it > > like antennas. > > +++Hi Zack. Thanks for the lesson about EMF exposure. Do you think the > ferrite beads Dr. Mercola sells help people using cell phones? > > Here's the link: http://tinyurl.com/55sn2b > > I personally believe Dr. Mercola tends to be an alarmist about a few > things. > > The best, Bee > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 > > Dear All, Dear Bee, > > I'm trying to reduce my EMF; I've disconnected the cordless phones and rarely use my cellular. Its been forefront on my mind for weeks now, and todays mercola only made me act. What do any of you do? Bee is this Earthcalm anything that you have an opinion on? > ## Snip Hi , Its good you are being proactive by minimizing your cell phone usage . You can replace your cordless with a corded phone , that would be a significant better option . Furthermore , you can create a healthy living home environment by adding plants , removing carpeting & replacing with mats / area rugs (easier maintenance ) , .. ... etc . These things improve the oxygen content of your home , empower your immune system and also improve mood Nonetheless , the above suggestions are supplemental and not necessary as fortifying your body is more important than fortifying your environment . . Therefore , try not to get too concerned / obsessive . However , Zack is correct , its nearly impossible to avoid EMF exposure these days . Paraphrasing , Zack , there are lots of gimmicks and con artist preying on health conscious individuals , its a growing industry . This why the consumer needs to self educate themselves and not take things face value . Your best defense is to empower your immune system . Moreover , let us not forget Niacin helps to detoxify the body of radiation / electrical exposure . Of course food and supplements , recomended , work alongside. Best 2 You , Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 > > Hi Bee and All, > No, the ferrite beads are worthless. If they were effective, they would also > make your phone useless. If someone is that concerned about it, I'd > recommend just getting rid of the phone and trying to avoid areas where > others nearby are using cell phones. And even then, as I said before, we are > completely surrounded by cell phone towers in most places. If you have > access to a cell phone signal in your area, you're bathed in the RF energy > from a cell tower. > > I forgot to mention to those who don't know it, that I am an electrical > engineer, specifically an RF/microwave/antenna engineer. +++That puts thing into perspective very well. You certainly have the expertise to inform us! So the point is, to " pick the battles " you can win and maintain health with good foods and supplements. Thanks a bunch Zack. Cheers, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Thank you Bee, Zack and Ed, Yes, I'm glad I wrote in before I purchased. Did you have an opinion on the claimed connection between hi EMF zones of pregnant women and Spectrum disorder babies that Mercola featured? To answer you Bee, I live and have always lived with powerlines all over. they are at eyelevel to the bedroom windows. Zach, that's interesting that these ferrite beads don't work. I really wanted to get one as I definitely notice the sensation when I'm talking on my cell phone; I begin to feel (not pain, not ache, just feel) the bones in the arm holding the cell phone. I figure I am aware of the effects of radiation, but it could be psychosomatic I guess. Thanks all. Rach > > > > Hi Bee and All, > > No, the ferrite beads are worthless. If they were effective, they would also > > make your phone useless. If someone is that concerned about it, I'd > > recommend just getting rid of the phone and trying to avoid areas where > > others nearby are using cell phones. And even then, as I said before, we are > > completely surrounded by cell phone towers in most places. If you have > > access to a cell phone signal in your area, you're bathed in the RF energy > > from a cell tower. > > > > I forgot to mention to those who don't know it, that I am an electrical > > engineer, specifically an RF/microwave/antenna engineer. > > +++That puts thing into perspective very well. You certainly have the expertise to inform us! > > So the point is, to " pick the battles " you can win and maintain health with good foods and supplements. > > Thanks a bunch Zack. > > Cheers, Bee > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 > It is most important to lower EMF exposure while you are sleeping, so unplug lamps, electric alarm clock.... I have created a main switch that turns on and off all power in my room. I turn it off when I go to bed and put it on when I wake up. It was originally on a timer but I found it better to do it manually. I love it cause it's so quick and easy! I can really recommend it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 > > > > Hi Bee and All, > > No, the ferrite beads are worthless. If they were effective, they would also make your phone useless. If someone is that concerned about it, I'd recommend just getting rid of the phone and trying to avoid areas where others nearby are using cell phones. ## Snip > > I forgot to mention to those who don't know it, that I am an electrical engineer, specifically an RF/microwave/antenna engineer. Hi Zack , Perhaps what you stipulate in regards to " ferrite beads " may be so. However , I'm intrigued by the subject , due to so many claims , but particularly to the link below . It shows the beads manufactured along with the cable with a fairly decent explanation regarding its purpose . These " ferrite beads " are also called " ferrite chokes " . Moreover the site with this article , is popular and fairly reputable . Link : http://tinyurl.com/lkbhu2 Nonetheless , I am NOT questioning your credentials , but intrigued to your response to the information in the aforementioned link . Can you shed some light why their information is incorrect ? Considering in your view this technology is worthless . Although , I concur we are completely surrounded by EMF . However anything that has potential to improve our health , we should consider if its feasible . Best Regards , Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Thanks Lis, I do think this will help, although there is nothin plugged in at all in my room. I know the sockets might leak, but this is probably minimal as zack would say compared to the big street light with wires and transformers that are eye level to the bedroom window. I'm going to try wearing a magnet on my body to see if that helps. Hopefully it can't harm. Got an email back from someone on it that has had success with a simple magnet on his legs. I'll let you know. Thanks Rach > > > It is most important to lower EMF exposure while you are sleeping, so unplug lamps, electric alarm clock.... > > I have created a main switch that turns on and off all power in my room. I turn it off when I go to bed and put it on when I wake up. It was originally on a timer but I found it better to do it manually. I love it cause it's so quick and easy! I can really recommend it. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Hi Ed, The original purpose of ferrite chokes was to keep radio energy from nearby transmitters from getting into computers, telephones, answering machines, etc. Someone with a nearby radio transmitter would often wipe out a corded phone or answering machine and the ferrite choke would prevent that. They also keep radio-frequency energy, called " hash, " from getting out of a computer, monitor, etc and being radiated. This will keep a monitor or computer from interfering with nearby radio receiving equipment. The power radiated by devices such as computers, monitors, digital equipment is on the order of microwatts (millionths of a watt). These devices are not meant to be radio transmitters. The link Bee included from Dr. Mercola's site refers to using ferrite chokes on cords for cell phones. The cords are not meant to be antennas and radiate microwatts of energy, if anything. The antenna of the cell phone itself radiates watts of energy - on the order of a million times what's coming out of the cord. Your body is absorbing some part of that watt or so of energy radiated by the cell phone antenna - which is meant to radiate it into space. So why put a choke on a cable that possibly radiates some millionths of a watt of energy when it is right by an antenna that is radiating a hundred thousand or a million times that? If you cut down the power radiated by the antenna, you've defeated the purpose of the cell phone. Zack On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM, imysterios <imysterios@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Bee and All, > > > > No, the ferrite beads are worthless. If they were effective, they would > also make your phone useless. If someone is that concerned about it, I'd > recommend just getting rid of the phone and trying to avoid areas where > others nearby are using cell phones. > > ## Snip > > > > I forgot to mention to those who don't know it, that I am an electrical > engineer, specifically an RF/microwave/antenna engineer. > > Hi Zack , > > Perhaps what you stipulate in regards to " ferrite beads " may be so. > However , I'm intrigued by the subject , due to so many claims , but > particularly to the link below . It shows the beads manufactured along with > the cable with a fairly decent explanation regarding its purpose . These " > ferrite beads " are also called " ferrite chokes " . Moreover the site with > this article , is popular and fairly reputable . > > Link : http://tinyurl.com/lkbhu2 > > Nonetheless , I am NOT questioning your credentials , but intrigued to your > response to the information in the aforementioned link . > Can you shed some light why their information is incorrect ? > > Considering in your view this technology is worthless . > > Although , I concur we are completely surrounded by EMF . However anything > that has potential to improve our health , we should consider if its > feasible . > > Best Regards , > Ed > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 > > Hi Ed, > ## Snip > > So why put a choke on a cable that possibly radiates some millionths of a > watt of energy when it is right by an antenna that is radiating a hundred > thousand or a million times that? If you cut down the power radiated by the > antenna, you've defeated the purpose of the cell phone. > Zack > ## Hey Zack , Thanks , that's interesting . Nonetheless , the short of it is , one would need a larger / or more powerful ferrite choke to accomplish what is proposed by these promoted ferrite beads which would nullify the cellphone's function / transmission . Thus , just confirms my suspicion , that the powerful transmission from satellite to cellphone does not equate a small ferrite bead /choke protecting the user . The power difference is too great . Ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 That's not the point. Your cell phone is a transmitter. The purpose of the transmitter is to send a signal to a tower nearby, which relays your audio or text message to its recipient. If you reduce the power sent by the phone to the cell site to an insignificant level, it won't be received at the tower at the other end. You've just defeated the purpose of the cell phone, so you might as well not even have one. There's no way around it. If you want a cell phone, you are going to have to live with the energy it radiates. Zack On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:22 PM, imysterios <imysterios@...> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Ed, > > > ## Snip > > > > So why put a choke on a cable that possibly radiates some millionths of a > > watt of energy when it is right by an antenna that is radiating a hundred > > thousand or a million times that? If you cut down the power radiated by > the > > antenna, you've defeated the purpose of the cell phone. > > Zack > > > ## Hey Zack , > > Thanks , that's interesting . > > Nonetheless , the short of it is , one would need a larger / or more > powerful ferrite choke to accomplish what is proposed by these promoted > ferrite beads which would nullify the cellphone's function / transmission . > > Thus , just confirms my suspicion , that the powerful transmission from > satellite to cellphone does not equate a small ferrite bead /choke > protecting the user . The power difference is too great . > > Ed > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 > > Thank you Bee, Zack and Ed, > > Yes, I'm glad I wrote in before I purchased. Did you have an opinion on the claimed connection between hi EMF zones of pregnant women and Spectrum disorder babies that Mercola featured? > > To answer you Bee, I live and have always lived with powerlines all over. they are at eyelevel to the bedroom windows. +++Hi . I think there is more to it than just EMF, since babies acquire both parent's " nutritional status " upon conception. What symptoms are you having that make you become concerned about EMF exposure? luv, Bee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Zack, Thanks for taking the time to answer our questions. Is there any value in getting a cell phone with a lower radiation output? See http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/newsrelease .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 It certainly wouldn't hurt! You might have less range with it but it's a step in the right direction. Zack On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Brand < elizabethbrand@...> wrote: > > > Zack, > > Thanks for taking the time to answer our questions. Is there any value > in getting a cell phone with a lower radiation output? See > http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/newsrelease > . > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Hi Zack, I read somewhere that some cactus may reduce EMF, have you ever heard of that? Adri. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.