Guest guest Posted May 18, 2001 Report Share Posted May 18, 2001 Of course, the FDA was responsible for giving saline breast implants the " all clear " for marketing in the USA last year, despite the horrific problems associated with them. Patty From: " Ilena Rose " <ilena@...> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 10:28 AM Subject: Esteemed Medical Editor of Lancet Rips Into FDA > EXCERPT: > " It is an impossible conflict for safety issues to be overseen by a center > that receives funding from industry to review and approve new drugs, " > Horton added. > > > http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,43891,00.html > > Medical Editor Rips Into FDA > > Reuters > > 11:54 a.m. May 17, 2001 PDT > > LONDON -- The editor of a top medical journal on Friday accused the U.S. > Food and Drug Administration, the world's most powerful drug watchdog, of > endangering people's lives. > > Horton of The Lancet said the FDA, which safeguards the health of > 274 million people and regulates over $1 trillion worth of products, was > compromised by funding from the drugs industry and pressure from > > In an editorial, he slammed the FDA for its handling of GlaxoKline > Plc's controversial bowel drug Lotronex. > > The FDA approved Lotronex in February 2000, but the company voluntarily > withdrew it from the market nine months later after the deaths of five > patients who had been taking it. > > Senior FDA officials are now trying to reintroduce it, Horton said. > > " This story reveals not only dangerous failings in a single drug's > approval and review process but also the extent to which the FDA, its > Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) in particular, has become a > servant of the industry, " he wrote in an editorial in the journal. > > According to Horton, serious side effects were evident during the > pre-approval process and shortly afterwards but the FDA kept the product > on the market. " The decision was to prove fatal, " said Horton. > > The Lancet said scientists within the FDA who raised concerns about the > drug's safety were sidelined and excluded from future discussions. An > independent review of research found serious flaws but calls for more > studies were ignored. > > " That is where there has been a terrible failure in evaluating the safety > of this drug, " Horton told Reuters. > > " The FDA is not only compromised because it receives so much funding from > industry, but because it comes under incredible congressional pressure to > be favorable to industry. That has led to deaths, " he added. > > A spokesman at the FDA said he could not comment on the editorial but > added that the agency was formulating a response to the allegations. > > The agency monitors the safety, labeling, import, transport, storage and > sale of food ingredients, drugs, cosmetics and surgical supplies. > > GlaxoKline confirmed the company was in discussions with the FDA but > refused to discuss the timing of any decision. > > " We are in discussions with the FDA over Lotronex, " spokesman > Sutton said. " Both the FDA and ourselves are trying to find a resolution > that will benefit and protect patients. " > > Lotronex was developed to treat irritable bowel syndrome which can cause > disabling bouts of constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bloating. > > But soon after its launch reports of side effects such as severe > constipation and ischaemic colitis, a restriction of blood flow to the > colon, began to surface. > > " It is an impossible conflict for safety issues to be overseen by a center > that receives funding from industry to review and approve new drugs, " > Horton added. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.