[NeuroHBOT] Re: The Underhanded and Hypo-Medical Society

[Guest guest]

,

Take a tablet, maybe two, and a nap, then when you're all better, and more

civil, I'll try to explain things for you, using little words you can

understand:

BTW, I have as much reason to make up something as you do to use the language

you used in your post. I'll bet your mother is proud of you.

1. There is at least one photo from the public press of the Polokwane chamber in

which you can see the edge of the torn hull. I don't doubt that there were

thicker components, such as the door, that were strewn about.

2. Given that the Polokwane chamber was a multiplace, typical practice would be

to operate at 2.0 ATA or greater, compared to the 1.75 ATA treatment pressure

and 2.0 ATA rating of the Vickers unit.

BTW, I have as much reason to make up something as you do to use the language

you used in your post. I'll bet your mother is proud of you.

3. Your education obviously did not include instruction in the difference

between absolute and gauge pressures, nor in critical reading and thinking.

Listen carefully. The Apollo capsule was designed to operate at around 5 psia

(absolute pressures are referenced to a vacuum, gauge pressures reference the

local atmospheric pressure). The 16 psi you cite is an absolute pressure, equal

to approximately 1.3 psig. A Vickers chamber is rated to a maximum gauge

pressure of 14.7 psi, which is 29.4 psia.

Now, that's all the time we have for class today .

Go wash out your mouth with soap.

Next time you call someone a liar, make sure you understand the facts before you

shoot off your mouth.

>

> >1. The Polokwane chamber was not 10 cm steel - I have a photo that indicates

a thickness of < 25 cm

> 10 cm is < 25 cm as well. The newspaper articl on the hyperbaric truths page

says says " The blast ripped open the steel wall of the cylinder, which was

between 10cm and 15cm thick, and shattered neighbours' window "

> >Regardless, there are no specific detalis regarding the chamber beyond the

public news >reports, but one could assume that the chamber was being operated

at a higher pressure >than the Vickers

> Explane why? 

> >I have heard an anecdotal report that a flammable substance >(surgical

spirits) was involved in the fire.

> Since you're a UHSM member and the uSHM is a dishonest organization, I have to

ask if did you just make that up?

> I've also heard is now living on some carribean island with

Elvis and JFK.

> >No, more like apples vs iguanas.

> How? Please explain in detail not just because you say so and your uuhms.

> >contained a large fuel load, and contained active electronic >components

operating at substantially higher voltage and >amperages than the Vickers. 

> Bullshit. pure bullshit. A spark is a spark is a spark no matter what the

voltages and ampriges.

> >Because Apollo capsules were designed to operate with a 100% >oxygen

environment, it's maximum pressure rating was >substantially lower than a

modern hyperbaric chamber - or even an >old design like the Vickers

> More lying iquana bullshit. A Vickers chambers were also made to operate in a

100% oxygen environment were they not?

> 300 psi vs 15 psi?

> You're a G-damn uums liar. You're own wiki refereance at says it was just 2

psi over sea level pressure. Apples and iquans my ass. You're a liar. " " " Since

the CM was designed to endure outward pressure in the vacuum of space, the

plugs-out test had been run with the cabin pressure at over 16 psi, almost 2 psi

above the ambient sea level pressure at Launch Complex 34 and near the upper

limits of measuring devices in the spacecraft. " " that's under CAUSE. 16 is

barely 1 psi over the vickers14.7 apples and iquans its apples and apples you

uuhms liar.

> >on this chamber, it should have been somewhere around 17 psig, or >2.2 ATA

> so its more pressure than apollo spaceshiop?

> >That's all I have time to comment on today. 

> I'll bet. Go make up some more bullshit you iquana reptile liar like a dman

devil snake.

>

> K