Guest guest Posted March 15, 2004 Report Share Posted March 15, 2004 A 510(k) can cover several chambers. If you look at the clearance for the portables, you will note that for the one clearance number, there are SEVERAL chambers listed. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/k001409.pdf Ok, now folow carefully..... look at the 510(k) and look in the device description. IT LISTS SEVERAL MODELS! Wow so that means you do not need a separate number for each chamber. So folks, the sky is not falling. The big bad wolf is not about to blow down the house and we all need to get back to reality! > , since they are not the manufacturer, who is? Who can I contact at > the manufacturer to find the 510K? > Are you aware that the FDA requires a 510k for each different product so > that means we need three 510K numbers, does it not? I am glad you have > cleared this up, now if you will just get me a contact person at the > manufacturer so I can call them and give them my fax number or get the 510 > numbers from them so I can get a copy from the FDA. > > I really appreciate this, , I knew you would not want all these parents > to be in the dark about this. You can email me privately with their name > and phone number if you would rather not post it on the list. I can get > the 510K numbers tomorrow and we can get this all cleared up so business can > be back to normal as usual. I have 3 emails right now on which is the best > IFU to buy from interested parents. I will be able to verify everything is > OK and they can call Oxyhealth if they want to. Or they can call the other > company who does not have a 510K and was upfront about it. > > Thanks, . I am sure everyone will be happy to hear the answers > tomorrow since you are helping to clear up this mystery. > > Now I feel better. > Hartsoe > > Re: [MedicaidforHDOT] No 510K clearance > > > > >a 510k number for any product that Oxy Health manufactures > > > > > > --as Mr. Wicker posted earlier, OxyHealth is not the manufacturer. > > > > > > > > > > >Well I have done search after search on the website at > > >http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm > > >and there are NO 510K documents of any type for Oxy Health Corporation or > > >for Samir Patel or for either of the 3 chambers they market. > NONE!!!! > > > > > >So, Dr. Fojgel, , and anyone else who has the info, please provide > me > > >with a 510k number for any product that Oxy Health manufactures. Since > > >all of you have seen these and know they exist, you should have no > problem > > >providing this information to this group. Just a simple number is all > I > > >have ever asked for. This is public information according to the > freedom > > >of information act. I have been on the phone with the FDA and they have > > >not been able to provide me with anything. They are going to research it > > >further for me but I doubt anything will be found. It is interesting to > > >note that I can get this information for any of the other manufacturers > > >for any particular chamber they offer. If you do a search for the > Solace > > >you will get Latex gloves. > > > > > >What does this prove? It proves that someone is lying or being lied to. > > >Maybe that is ok in your book but not in mine. > > > > > >What does it prove about the IFU's? Absolutely nothing. It does not > > >prove that they are unsafe or safe. > > >It does not prove they are effective or ineffective. > > >It does not prove that they are overpriced or underpriced. > > >It does not prove whether they will last for 100 treatments or 100,000 > > >treatments. > > > > > >Does this mean I would not recommend one? Absolutely not. If I had a > > >child and the only way I could get treatments was with an IFU I would not > > >hesitate to buy one. > > > > > >However, I would want to see some type of testing documentation by an > > >independant laboratory that the chamber had been tested under pressure, > > >the type of testing, and the results of those tests. I would want to > see > > >documentation of testing on the safety and wearability of the zipper and > > >any other components which were used, including the small compressor > used > > >to put the air in the chamber that my child would be breathing. I think > > >that we can all agree that if a company has a product good enough for > > >someone to get into under pressure, the company should be willing to > > >provide these test results for an item they are getting 10 to 20 thousand > > >dollars for, shouldn't they? > > > > > >ly, the 510k does not mean that much on these inflatables to me > > >except to insure me they have met some safety criteria. Now what do we > > >have to show for safety? > > > > > >The floor is open for comment? Anyone? > > > > > >CAUTION: This is not an OXYHEALTH bashing forum so do not turn it into > > >one. Instead, why not work together to find out if the safety issues > > >are clear or not. I never meant it to be a bashing forum and still do > > >not. It all started with a simple question, Do they have a 510K > > >clearance or not. They do not according to the FDA. If I have > missed > > >something, help me out here and get me the numbers. > > > > > >My opinion: > > >We have at least 5 types of people on this board right now. > > >1.) Those who would like to see the inflatable chambers fall flat on > their > > >face. This may be because: (A) they offer fierce competition for the > HBOT > > >dollar which is very limited. or ( It may be because of a degree of > > >engineering or professional training which requires the safety issues to > > >be strictly by the book with absolutely no exceptions. > > > > > >2.) Those who have an interest financially in the success of the > > >inflatable chamber whether it be in the form of financial compensation > > >directly from Samir Patel or for some other reason. > > > > > >3.) Those who are parents or caregivers who own a IFU and have now > > >discovered they may have been deceived and need to know if it is really > > >safe or not. They have gotten results and like what they have but they > > >want something to show them they have not been decieved and they want to > > >continue with their chamber with no fears because they have that right. > > > > > >4.) Those who are parents are caregivers who would like to purchase a > > >IFU but want to make certain it is safe. They probably don't care about > a > > >510K clearance but they want some type of assurance in the form of > written > > >documentation that certain safety and wear tests have been performed and > > > >they have that right. > > > > > >5.) Those who would like to just find a way of providing hbot to those > > >who need it, whether it be with an inflatable or hard shell chamber, or > > >the combination of both as long as it happens and happens safely. > > > > > >What do we do? We quit all the secreacy and crap. We quit lurking in > the > > >bushes waiting for someone to make a mistake so we can leap on them. We > > >all begin looking for compromises with one thing in mind, # 5.) above. > > >Is that going to happen, Of course not. As long as money is involved, > > >we have no way of knowing who to believe, who to rely on, who to listen > > >to. > > > > > >I bring these issues to the forefront because they continously stand in > > >the way of progress. There are two many sides to the story. No one is > > >winning. Everyone is losing. > > > > > >If you have any information which is holding up progress or which is > > >serving only the mighty dollar and needs to be exposed, whatever it is, > > >please email me, notify me. It must be verifiable. This will be my > > >last summer of this battle. If the hyperbaric community does not want > to > > >work together to make it affordable and available to everyone, I do not > > >want to be involved. I will leave the community and continue to do what > > >I can on a private basis. I will probably be hated by the professionals > > >but that is not a problem, I have a lot of friends for the right reasons > > >who I will not lose. I think its time we straighten up and fly right as > > >my Dad used to say. We have a family in Utah who has a child in need of > > >hbot. The father is disabled and needs HBOT. The father has lost his > job > > >because of his disability which could be helped with hbot. They have > > >lost their car and their home. Yet they have no hope of getting hbot. > > >Do you see something wrong with this picture. I do. If you see > > >something wrong with this picture are you willing to do something about > > >it? > > > > > >True colors will show up before it is all done and said. > > > > > > Hartsoe > > >www.miraclemountain.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.