Sorry about the blank one without letter...Janet s

[Guest guest]

Subj: Re: Janet s teleworking

Date: 1/27/03 12:41:39 PM Eastern Standard Time

From: MaglarasDN@...

DevaneyTM@..., Gingersnap1964@..., SuslaDR@...

CC: SychterzJA@..., McCoyKM@..., rep.tomallen@..., BoydLR@..., senator@..., KautzJH@..., MG@..., _Morin@..., BufithisCP@..., ShortRE@..., Olympia@..., ShultsME@..., OeserLP@..., EleftherionTA@...

Sent from the Internet (Details)

Good morning,

I have noticed that several people have read my e-mail of 23 Jan

concerning Mari Shults' working at home during the 96, 97 timeframe. Has

anyone looked into this any further? I will talk to Ross Drivas this

afternoon to see if anyone has asked him about a remote account that was set

up for her during that time. The claim was made that it was only for e-mail

purposes. It doesn't matter...it was done for her and it should be done for

Janet as well. There is a record of it somewhere. The person who

authorized it may not want to admit it, however, it still was done as I have

talked to people who remember it. It should be investigated. Mari denies

it and is fighting Janet being able to telework form home. Janet knows her

job better than anyone on the shipyard, and she knows how much of it she

could do from home. She should not be railroaded off the shipyard because

manage doesn't want to help her. Sooner or later, management will have to

develop a policy for teleworking as it is only a matter of time before there

is another Janet. It can't be ignored forever. I can't imaging why Mari is

fighting Janet after all of the years of faithful work and bailing Mari out

of audit findings and covering for her. Why is the shipyard afraid of Mari

Shults?

Respectfully,

Dan

Maglaras

Code 260.2

Engineering & Planning Dept

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard

Portsmouth, NH. 03804-5000

Tel: 207-438-3215

Fax: 207-438-3735

E-mail: maglarasdn@...

<mailto:maglarasdn@...>