Health, Medicine and Natural Healing 07

434,601 topics in this forum

1. Re: Success with repositioning?

   By Guest guest, March 12, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 39 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • March 12, 2007

2. Re: Success with repositioning?

   By Guest guest, March 11, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 44 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • March 11, 2007

3. Re: Switched from Danmar to DOC

   By Guest guest, September 24, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 48 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • September 24, 2007

4. Re: Switched from Danmar to DOC

   By Guest guest, September 24, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 64 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • September 24, 2007

5. Re: Time length ???

   By Guest guest, September 7, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 55 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • September 7, 2007

6. Re: Time length ???

   By Guest guest, September 7, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 44 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • September 7, 2007

7. Re: Time length ???

   By Guest guest, September 8, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 51 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • September 8, 2007

8. Re: Torticollis, formula feeding and maybe acid reflux?

   By Guest guest, March 22, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 53 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • March 22, 2007

9. Re: Tricare

   By Guest guest, October 19, 2007
   • 0 replies
   • 51 views
   • 
   • Guest
   • October 19, 2007

10. Re: two_soulmates

    By Guest guest, February 5, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 54 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • February 5, 2007

11. Re: two_soulmates

    By Guest guest, February 5, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 50 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • February 5, 2007

12. Re: UGH! Top Specialist (Dr Vacari in IL) says no band needed but I STILL think

    By Guest guest, October 15, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 54 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 15, 2007

13. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed . . . MEASUREMENTS

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 63 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

14. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 45 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

15. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 59 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

16. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 54 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

17. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 45 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

18. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 38 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

19. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 46 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

20. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 51 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

21. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 15, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 49 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 15, 2007

22. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 46 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

23. Re: UGH! Top Specialist says no band needed but I STILL think-PICS R UP

    By Guest guest, October 16, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 56 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • October 16, 2007

24. Re: UHC Appeal

    By Guest guest, November 6, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 77 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • November 6, 2007

25. Re: UHC Appeal

    By Guest guest, November 7, 2007
    • 0 replies
    • 62 views
    • 
    • Guest
    • November 7, 2007