Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Additional Information On Hannah Poling v. Sec. HHS (case 02-1466V)

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

ALL,

Questions have been asked with respect to:

How is it KNOWN that the conceded vaccine

injury case, Hannah Poling v. Sec. HHS

(02-1466V) is a " Thimerosal causes autism "

case?

To access all of the available (to CoMeD)

public-record information that addresses this

question, you can visit the CoMeD website:

http://www.dr-king.com and, on the " Documents "

page, access the link:

>

> " An UPDATED Review of the Doublespeak

>in: 'Vaccines and Autism: Myths and

>Misconceptions' By Novella

>(5 March 2008, 75 pages)

>

and read the pertinent sections in this

review article.

In addition, please consider the following

facts:

1. The case 02-1466V was filed as an autism

case in the National Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program (NVICP) in 2002.

2. In the vaccine-injury Autism Omnibus,

NVICP Case 02-1466V was selected as one of

the candidate test cases.

3. Based on patient records, the petitioners

in the Autism Omnibus selected Case

02-1466V as one of the original " hypothesis

2 " (Thimerosal as a causal factor), 3 test

cases and a hearing of this case was

tentatively scheduled for some time in

2008.

4. The published case study (from 2006):

Poling JS, Fyre RE, Shoffner J, Zimerman, AW.

Developmental regression and mitochondrial

dysfunction in a child with autism. J Child

Neurol February 2006; 21(2): 170-172 (a Brief

Communication) clearly identifies the child

as having autism with affective, neuromuscular

and hearing disorders ( " Case Report " on page

171, col 1 in the " no family history of "

statement.

5. Before the case could be heard in 2008, the

government pre-emptively conceded the case

on 9 Nov 2007 citing " mitochondrial disorder "

6. Therefore, based on all of the proceeding it

is OBVIOUS that Case 02-1466V, filed as an

" autism case " in the NVICP in 2002 & scheduled

as a " Thimerosal as a causal factor " test case

in 2007 for the vaccine injury Autism Omnibus

was and is a " Thimerosal in vaccines caused

autism " case since the government did NOT state

that:

a. There was NO evidence that the child had

mercury poisoning (because it is apparent

that she did), or

b. Vaccine-derived Thimerosal does NOT poison

the mitochondrial systems of the body (as

several published studies have shown that

Thimerosal does mercury poison the mitochondria

of cells, the child got a Thimerosal-preserved

hepatitis B vaccine on the day she was born and

additional Thimerosal-preserved vaccines at 2,

3.5 and 6 months resulting in obvious immune-

system dysfunction manifesting as chronic

infections that led to a delay in further

vaccination until about 19 months of age when

the child, apparently mostly recovered from

the prior chronic infections, received two (2)

Thimerosal-preserved vaccines and four (4)

live viruses (measles, mumps, rubella, and

varicella), and her observable regression

started shortly thereafter.

Hopefully, the preceding information has addressed

the questions you may have regarding CoMeD's

26 February 2008 Press Release:

>

> " US Government Concedes Vaccines Cause Autism

>(26 February 2008) "

>

a copy of which is available through the

" Press Releases & Related Files " web page.

*******************************************

*The information provided in this email *

*and any attachment thereto is just that *

* -- information. *

* *

*It is not medical advice and it does not *

*require any specific action or actions. *

* *

*While the information is thought to be *

*accurate, no representation is made as *

*to the accuracy of the information posted*

*other than it is my best understanding of*

*the facts on the date that this email and*

*any attachments thereto are posted. *

* *

*Everyone should verify the accuracy of *

*the information provided for themselves *

*before acting on it. *

*******************************************

If you want more evidence, would suggest that

you MAY want to submit FOIA requests to the

US Court of Claims for the experts filed

reports and all of the other administrative

records in Case 02-1466V.

Respectfully,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

CoMeD Science Advisor

http://www.mercury-freedrugs.org

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...