Re: Daughter with possible Candida?

[Guest guest]

>

> How can you tell if you gave your child candida? Can that really be

> possible? Her diet absent from 95% sugar, no wheat except ezeikel

> bread, which i understand is sprouted so it is better?, no dairy

> except once in a great while a slice of cheese on a burger, no bad

> oils, occasional organic corn tortila chips, little to no fruit and

> she still continues to have loose stools. AT times the are slightly

> formed and this has been going on for about 2 years now. I have had

> her tested for parasites(doc ordered this last year with another

test for why she may have chronic loose stools. I am seeing dark

circles under eyes at times but not all the time. Could be due to

seasonal allergies? as she sniffles at times. I dont think there is

much more with her as she is really healthy and growing like a weed.

Acually she is quite big for her age in height and weight. I dont say

shes overweight but she has a little pudge. Her eyes are clear and

> sparkle..her skin is a bit dry but nice. I am not sure what else to

> tell you about her. I do give her cod liver oil, coconut oil, 1-2

> drops of Oregano oil daily, a good brand of probiotics and she eats

> mainly what we do with a small amount of rice pasta sometimes 1x a

> week, 1 small cookie a day organic brand that is oatmeal, and the

> rest meat and veggies.

==>It is not possible for someone else to get candida from you, not

more than they could get a nutrient imbalance from you, so you

couldn't have given it to your daughter. But candida often runs in

families because they follow the same diet, drink the same water, and

have the same lifestyle, go to the same doctor, etc. Anyone who gets

candida is because their immune system isn't functioning up to par.

You, your husband and daughter would do well to go on the candida

program - it will give your body the nutrients you require to bring

your immune systems up to par. All grains must be soaked properly

before eating to remove the mineral and protein blocking substances.

>

> Can anyone help with to why her stool isnt formed?

==>Loose stools isn't always a bad thing, but if she cut out all

grains and increased fats and proteins to her ratios it would help,

>

> She is ready for school soon but I cant let her go to school with

> this problem for fear she wont be able to clean herself proper.

She still isnt able to learn this as its to messy for me to allow her

to do so. Any help would greatly be welcomed. If I need to add more

info please let me know.

==>Grains cause messy stools - they make stools sticky and hard to

get out, with lots of clean up. Normal bowel movements shouldn't

require clean up at all.

Cheers, Bee

>

[Guest guest]

> ==>It is not possible for someone else to get candida from you, not

> more than they could get a nutrient imbalance from you, so you

> couldn't have given it to your daughter. But candida often runs in

> families because they follow the same diet, drink the same water, and

> have the same lifestyle, go to the same doctor, etc. Anyone who gets

> candida is because their immune system isn't functioning up to par.

> You, your husband and daughter would do well to go on the candida

> program - it will give your body the nutrients you require to bring

> your immune systems up to par. All grains must be soaked properly

> before eating to remove the mineral and protein blocking substances.

Then why do moms and their nurslings trade thrush back and forth? I know

that babies' immune systems are obviously immature, but not all nursing

babies get thrush, and in my extensive experience with breastfeeding moms

and babies, I've never heard tell of just Baby or just Mom having thrush.

in IN

[Guest guest]

>

> > ==>It is not possible for someone else to get candida from you, not

> > more than they could get a nutrient imbalance from you, so you

> > couldn't have given it to your daughter. .

>

> Then why do moms and their nurslings trade thrush back and forth? I know

> that babies' immune systems are obviously immature, but not all nursing

> babies get thrush, and in my extensive experience with breastfeeding moms

> and babies, I've never heard tell of just Baby or just Mom having thrush.

>

> in IN

>

I have wondered about this too , but I am thinking some babies immune

systems

really are compromised when they are born due to the mother's health. When my

son was

born 7 years ago, I breastfed for 18 mo. and had no problems whatsoever (ie.

thrush). I

was healthy, he was never sick. When my twins were born almost 3 years ago, I

thought I

was healthy, but I had been through several stressful events in the years prior

to their

birth. When they were 6 wks old, we all got thrush and then my thyroid and my

adrenals

all malfunctioned which led to the mess I'm in now! My girls were sick so

much more

than my son ever was and I could never figure it out since they were breastfed

just as long.

Diflucan cleared up the thrush in their mouths, but it didn't help me. They

have been

healthier since they were weaned and are now drinking raw cow's milk. I think

my

breastmilk was poor quality because of my health and that their immune systems

were

compromised even when they were born because of my poor health. Whether they

have

candida now, who knows, but I definitely do.

Just my thoughts ...

Trish

[Guest guest]

Bee wrote: It is not possible for someone else to get candida from you,

not more than they could get a nutrient imbalance from you, so you

couldn't have given it to your daughter.

wrote:

> Then why do moms and their nurslings trade thrush back and forth? I

know that babies' immune systems are obviously immature, but not all

nursing babies get thrush, and in my extensive experience with

breastfeeding moms and babies, I've never heard tell of just Baby or

just Mom having thrush.

==>They both have it because they both get the same nutrients. They

don't pass it back and forth between them.

Bee

[Guest guest]

> ==>They both have it because they both get the same nutrients. They

> don't pass it back and forth between them.

I have to disagree here. An exclusively breast-fed baby does not get the

same nutrients that Mom gets. Our bodies don't work that way. To make

milk, our bodies deplete our vitamin/mineral stores to make the complete,

perfect food for babies - breast milk. That's why they stress the

prenatal vitamins so much when you're nursing. You're not taking the

vitamins and minerals to make the baby healthy. You're taking them for

your own health.

You can't really change the nutrient composition of your milk. I mean,

there are tricks that you can use to make sure Baby gets more calories

from the richer hind-milk, but regardless of your diet, your body is going

to make breast milk that meets the nutritional needs of your child (unless

you're hypothyroid or have some other issue. Then, the milk still has the

right nutrients; you just might have a supply issue.)

For instance, I was anemic for a long while after having my son. My milk

wasn't affected though. My milk still had every bit of iron in it that my

son needed because my body makes milk (or grows a baby when I'm pregnant)

at the expense of MY body, even if my diet is nutritionally deficient.

Our bodies know how to get minerals from our bones and teeth. Milk

production is of the highest priority, so the nutrients you take in go

toward milk production, and the woman herself gets the scraps.

So while I agree that women who end up with thrush might have diets that

are nutritionally inadequate, their exclusively breast-fed babies

absolutely do not. So again, we're left with my original question. If

yeast can't be transmitted between people, how might we explain the

apparent trading of yeast between mother and nursling when the baby is

being exclusively breast-fed? It's not making good sense to me.

in IN

[Guest guest]

wrote:

>

> > ==>They both have it because they both get the same nutrients.

They > don't pass it back and forth between them.

>

> I have to disagree here. An exclusively breast-fed baby does not

get the same nutrients that Mom gets.

==>The baby inherits the nutritional status of the parents, which

starts at conception. Poor nutritional status can take generations

to change, as proved by Dr. Weston Price.

==>Candida only starts to overgrow in a particular body when the

immune system is not operating as it should. It is not

transmissible any more than you can get a lack of nutrients from

another person. Do read information on the Germ Theory of Disease

as well which is in the Germ Theory Folder. Actually no

one " catches germs " - germs, viruses, bacteria all occur within your

own body. They start out benign microbes, and then they change when

needed. Viruses and bacteria are needed to clean out toxins, and

when their job is done they go back to being benign microbes. But

they can continue to change until they become pathogenic, which is

cancer.

==>Did you know that Pasteur actually was a fraud, and he lied about

his own lab tests, etc. and stole other people's ideas. Because he

was so forthright and outspoken his " Germ Theory of Disease " got

adopted by the medical association, and of course it makes them the

most money too. Keeping people sick is big business!

Bee

[Guest guest]

> ==>The baby inherits the nutritional status of the parents, which

> starts at conception. Poor nutritional status can take generations

> to change, as proved by Dr. Weston Price.

Hmm... That's some interesting food for thought. I definitely need to

look into that for my own edification.

As you'll usually find me saying around here, I'm not trying to be

argumentative. I'm just trying to get things to make sense in this weird

brain of mine.

in IN

[Guest guest]

So again, we're left with my original question. If

> yeast can't be transmitted between people, how might we explain the

> apparent trading of yeast between mother and nursling when the baby is

> being exclusively breast-fed? It's not making good sense to me.

>

> in IN

Hi , I can't answer your question, but here is a possible piece

of the puzzle. When I was nursing my first-born, he got thrush, but

as far as I know, I didn't have any. At the time, I just thought he

picked it up off the breast or the nipples of the water bottles.

>

[Guest guest]

wrote:

> So again, we're left with my original question. If

> > yeast can't be transmitted between people, how might we explain the

> > apparent trading of yeast between mother and nursling when the baby

is being exclusively breast-fed? It's not making good sense to me.

> >

> > in IN

==>Hi. Are you new to our group? Anyway, welcome!

> Hi , I can't answer your question, but here is a possible piece

> of the puzzle. When I was nursing my first-born, he got thrush, but

> as far as I know, I didn't have any. At the time, I just thought he

> picked it up off the breast or the nipples of the water bottles.

==>It is not possible for your baby, nor anyone, to get thrush or yeast

by " catching it " from a bottle or the breast. It can only happen

because of a depressed immune system. See our Folder " Germ & Antibody

Theories are False " .

Bee