Guest guest Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep up. If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a significant number of inches around first his chest and then his waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with the fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had worked down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a head of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on it, the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a single tablet. -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a lifetime supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 Now this is dam good news. Thanks Phil Summers <rsummers@...> wrote: - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep up. If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a significant number of inches around first his chest and then his waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with the fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had worked down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a head of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on it, the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a single tablet. -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a lifetime supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 7, 2006 Report Share Posted May 7, 2006 - Yep, right here. This is a great group, one of a kind. I'm glad to hear from you, had been following your husbands exploits with letrozole, fascinating stuff. I feel almost like I know you personally. Like reading a meticulous diary. You're about the only first hand source of info for letrozole re males (with the added caveat that he is not on TRT.) For some odd reason, my insurance picked up the bill for both the arimidex and letrozole scripts at the same time, so not being one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I been getting them both, using the arimidex and stock piling the letrozole. I store the bottles in small zip lock bags in one of those miniature frigs (like the ones the college kids use in their dorms) keeping them cold and trying to keep the potency going as long as possible. My experience with arimidex was 1) taking a dose of 0.25mg (quarter tab) - good choice. 2) taking this dose every day for 32 days - bad choice. My estradiol at the start was 60pg/mL (range:13-54) I had the sensation that something was " off " , nothing I could pin down. I thought the value was too high, only to learn later that its nothing compared to the sky high numbers some guys in this group get. The desirable number apparently is somewhere around 30. Anyway, after a month my estradiol dropped to -5-, and probably the only reason they could see that much was because they ran the extra sensitive extraction method. I'm glad I didn't try the letrozole, with my " brilliant " calculations, it probably would have taken my head off, lol. So now, I'm taking 0.25mg arimidex per week guesstimating (hoping) it should handle the estradiol. I may drop that dose back to once/14days as I'm thinking the estradiol is really not that much of a problem for me. I'm also on depo-t and HCG, which automatically puts me in a different category from your husband. The dose of depo-t keeps bouncing between 60 and 80mg/week (the 60mg dose really feels too weak and I start to drag) and right now I'm splitting the difference by trying 70mg. The HCG is 100iu, daily. So far, so good. If I have to drop anything, it will probably be the HCG as it looks like I'm going to be on depo-t (and occasional specks of arimidex or letrozole) for life. Rich > - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your > husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- > > I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep up. > > If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last > dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time > that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a > significant number of inches around first his chest and then his > waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good > number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with the > fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of > striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but > the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen > conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. > > Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he > hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about > cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the > inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! > > ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so > far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the > letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had worked > down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a head > of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- > > Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my > husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a > correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on > TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on it, > the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a > single tablet. > > -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less > potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- > > In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid > out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a lifetime > supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) > > Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Hi Rich, Just wanted to jump in here your Estradiol needs to be between 10 to 30 best at 20 when I go to low I lose morning wood so I use this as a gauge. When wood stops I try to get it up if I can't I konw I am to low and stop the arimidex until the wood comes back. .25 mgs. once is dam low dose. So here is what you do after your next test if you find your over 30 do it 2 x's a week keep checking wood as long as you have wood your not to low. Now doing your T shots if your feeling low the 2 days before you next shot then do the HCG 250 IU's the 2 days each before you next shot this will hold you over. If you stop HCG your testis will stop working and your levels can come down. Most of us here fight to get the Dr. to use HCG. Have you been to Dr. 's site www.allthingsmale.com and read TRT: A Recipe for Success and his HCG update. I started this last yr. am feeling the best I ever felt in the 22 yrs. on TRT. Phil Rich <caliconine@...> wrote: - Yep, right here. This is a great group, one of a kind. I'm glad to hear from you, had been following your husbands exploits with letrozole, fascinating stuff. I feel almost like I know you personally. Like reading a meticulous diary. You're about the only first hand source of info for letrozole re males (with the added caveat that he is not on TRT.) For some odd reason, my insurance picked up the bill for both the arimidex and letrozole scripts at the same time, so not being one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I been getting them both, using the arimidex and stock piling the letrozole. I store the bottles in small zip lock bags in one of those miniature frigs (like the ones the college kids use in their dorms) keeping them cold and trying to keep the potency going as long as possible. My experience with arimidex was 1) taking a dose of 0.25mg (quarter tab) - good choice. 2) taking this dose every day for 32 days - bad choice. My estradiol at the start was 60pg/mL (range:13-54) I had the sensation that something was " off " , nothing I could pin down. I thought the value was too high, only to learn later that its nothing compared to the sky high numbers some guys in this group get. The desirable number apparently is somewhere around 30. Anyway, after a month my estradiol dropped to -5-, and probably the only reason they could see that much was because they ran the extra sensitive extraction method. I'm glad I didn't try the letrozole, with my " brilliant " calculations, it probably would have taken my head off, lol. So now, I'm taking 0.25mg arimidex per week guesstimating (hoping) it should handle the estradiol. I may drop that dose back to once/14days as I'm thinking the estradiol is really not that much of a problem for me. I'm also on depo-t and HCG, which automatically puts me in a different category from your husband. The dose of depo-t keeps bouncing between 60 and 80mg/week (the 60mg dose really feels too weak and I start to drag) and right now I'm splitting the difference by trying 70mg. The HCG is 100iu, daily. So far, so good. If I have to drop anything, it will probably be the HCG as it looks like I'm going to be on depo-t (and occasional specks of arimidex or letrozole) for life. Rich > - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your > husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- > > I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep up. > > If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last > dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time > that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a > significant number of inches around first his chest and then his > waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good > number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with the > fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of > striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but > the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen > conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. > > Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he > hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about > cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the > inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! > > ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so > far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the > letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had worked > down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a head > of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- > > Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my > husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a > correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on > TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on it, > the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a > single tablet. > > -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less > potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- > > In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid > out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a lifetime > supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) > > Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Hey Rich and - Thought I would throw in my experience too. I was running ~ 56 on E2 shooting 60 to 80 mg/7 days of DEPO T. Started out on Arimidex at 0.25 mg every 7 days on the day of my shot. Didn't feel great but OK. Got tested 6 weeks later and found my E2 had dropped to < 15. Since then I have dropped the arimidex to 0.25 mg every 14 days and take it 24 hours after my T shot. My reasoning for this is that half life of arimidex is ~ 48 hours and you get the spike of Depo 48-72 hours. I have been doing this for ~ 4 weeks now with great results. I have not been tested yet but I feel good. Just another data point. I am 47 and weigh 160. Arkansas Rich <caliconine@...> wrote: - Yep, right here. This is a great group, one of a kind. I'm glad to hear from you, had been following your husbands exploits with letrozole, fascinating stuff. I feel almost like I know you personally. Like reading a meticulous diary. You're about the only first hand source of info for letrozole re males (with the added caveat that he is not on TRT.) For some odd reason, my insurance picked up the bill for both the arimidex and letrozole scripts at the same time, so not being one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I been getting them both, using the arimidex and stock piling the letrozole. I store the bottles in small zip lock bags in one of those miniature frigs (like the ones the college kids use in their dorms) keeping them cold and trying to keep the potency going as long as possible. My experience with arimidex was 1) taking a dose of 0.25mg (quarter tab) - good choice. 2) taking this dose every day for 32 days - bad choice. My estradiol at the start was 60pg/mL (range:13-54) I had the sensation that something was " off " , nothing I could pin down. I thought the value was too high, only to learn later that its nothing compared to the sky high numbers some guys in this group get. The desirable number apparently is somewhere around 30. Anyway, after a month my estradiol dropped to -5-, and probably the only reason they could see that much was because they ran the extra sensitive extraction method. I'm glad I didn't try the letrozole, with my " brilliant " calculations, it probably would have taken my head off, lol. So now, I'm taking 0.25mg arimidex per week guesstimating (hoping) it should handle the estradiol. I may drop that dose back to once/14days as I'm thinking the estradiol is really not that much of a problem for me. I'm also on depo-t and HCG, which automatically puts me in a different category from your husband. The dose of depo-t keeps bouncing between 60 and 80mg/week (the 60mg dose really feels too weak and I start to drag) and right now I'm splitting the difference by trying 70mg. The HCG is 100iu, daily. So far, so good. If I have to drop anything, it will probably be the HCG as it looks like I'm going to be on depo-t (and occasional specks of arimidex or letrozole) for life. Rich > - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your > husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- > > I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep up. > > If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last > dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time > that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a > significant number of inches around first his chest and then his > waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good > number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with the > fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of > striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but > the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen > conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. > > Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he > hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about > cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the > inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! > > ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so > far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the > letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had worked > down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a head > of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- > > Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my > husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a > correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on > TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on it, > the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a > single tablet. > > -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less > potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- > > In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid > out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a lifetime > supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) > > Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Hi Phil- I've been getting morning wood but only recently. The trouble is mostly with other meds: I take a calcium channel blocker (norvasc) as one of my BP meds which I belive has some inhibiting effect, but I'll have to live with it as its one of the few things to keep my BP under some control. I was also taking Proscar (for a slightly enlarged prostate) which is reknown for killing libido. This lead to quite a variety of things for trying to get erections, ranging from Viagra (very short lived action, not worth the side effects) to penile injections (with Bimix; and unlike my IM injections, they hurt like hell - although they did work.) The best by far, and most natural, was my depo-t. I switched to Saw Palmetto for the prostate, with surprisingly little argument from the Dr., and so far it seems to do just as good a job as Proscar without the side effects. If that changes, I'll have to re-evaluate. I was also on both Celexa and its more potent relative Lexapro (it wasn't for depression, per se; the Dr had tried just about every BP med known to man and he figured, what the heck, he'll try the psychological angle, if only to say it was tried - didn't work.) These two pills are really amazing, and I don't mean that in a nice way. As others have reported, they can be anorgasmic. I totally agree, they act like an " off-switch " . The hell of it is, you can have some libido at this point but with either of these pills you can't have an orgasm, period. This is like some exquisite form of torture. They seem to wash out of the system after 24hrs (with me, anyway) and then I'm back to normal. I was only an occasional user of the stuff, anyway. Re the arimidex, I've got one of those systems that seems way too sensitive to doses. I've learned the hard way on a great many medicines, the smaller the dose the better. I've had a few Drs that loved to start on a larger dose than I could handle and the side effects would just about kill me. I hope I might the luxury of basing doses of arimidex on this new found morning wood but in any event I think I've got a rough idea on the size of the dose to take. I'm also a type II diabetic, but I don't think the nerves have degenerated that much, not yet. I'll be 61 next month and I feel in better shape now (with morning wood, even) then I did a decade ago. Also: I first read The Recipe For Success on the Meso-rx site. I just noticed the HGC Update and that really makes more sense than the daily 100iu doses of HCG that I've been taking. I don't mind daily injections at all, but I got the impression that they were sort of wasted that way. I really don't need the extra little hit of T every day - except maybe at the end of my weekly run, as described in the article and even then I doubt I'll need much. I'll try the two 250iu doses, first. Rich > > - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your > > husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- > > > > I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep > up. > > > > If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last > > dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time > > that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a > > significant number of inches around first his chest and then his > > waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good > > number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with > the > > fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of > > striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but > > the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen > > conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. > > > > Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he > > hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about > > cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the > > inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! > > > > ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so > > far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the > > letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had > worked > > down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a > head > > of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- > > > > Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my > > husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a > > correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on > > TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on > it, > > the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a > > single tablet. > > > > -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less > > potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- > > > > In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid > > out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a > lifetime > > supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) > > > > Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 Hi Dan- I can remember weighing 160, in my " yoot " (around in my mid-40s, lol.) Even in my 50's I stayed around 180 (I'm 5'10'') then I ballooned. It seemed to coincide with the diabetes (right now I'm at 215, and it ain't budging, up or down) but I think the infamous " diabetic gut " is really a cop-out. When I get this testosterone business really fine tuned, I'll either burn it off, or I won't care because if that doesn't do it, nothing will. Rich > > Hey Rich and - Thought I would throw in my experience too. > > I was running ~ 56 on E2 shooting 60 to 80 mg/7 days of DEPO T. Started out on Arimidex at 0.25 mg every 7 days on the day of my shot. Didn't feel great but OK. Got tested 6 weeks later and found my E2 had dropped to < 15. Since then I have dropped the arimidex to 0.25 mg every 14 days and take it 24 hours after my T shot. My reasoning for this is that half life of arimidex is ~ 48 hours and you get the spike of Depo 48-72 hours. > > I have been doing this for ~ 4 weeks now with great results. I have not been tested yet but I feel good. Just another data point. I am 47 and weigh 160. > > Arkansas > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Hi Rich, Man that is dam good news I just hope this works for Roy he is 80. My Dr. was going to put me on BP meds. I told him after not being able to have sex for 10 yrs because of high Estradiol " E2 " . After getting it down me ED got 80% better and I can have sex it was hard enough and reach an orgasm Thank God. I told my Dr. let me try Cialis I under stand these pill like Viagra were found to work for ED and they were trying to find a better BP med. So he gave me Cialis 20 mgs. and told me to take it every 72 hrs. Now that 20% is much better my wife feels it is bigger and harder and it is keeping my BP down. I just checked it and it was 125/73 down a lot from 158/ 110 so talk to your Dr. about this and try getting off the calcium channel blocker and see if this works. I have my own gauge a Lumiscope you put on your wrist. If this does not work but I know it will try this. http://seniorhealth.about.com/cs/sex/a/cozaar.htm If you do the Cialis the sides are a stuffy noise and are gone in less then a week. If you get your total and free T levels up into the upper 1/3 of your labs range for a young man your type II diabetic should get much better low T can make type II diabetic worse. Dr. talked about this a lot at MESO do search. The first 5 yrs I was sick I was told I have Major Depression and was put on every kind of AD drug on the market never felt better. Then they found me to not be suffering Depression but that I have Low T. I had to go into Re-Hab to get off all them dam AD drugs. Going on TRT all that shit stopped and I felt much better and was able to get back to work. All of this started when I was 40 now 62. Let me know if this sounds good. Phil Rich <caliconine@...> wrote: Hi Phil- I've been getting morning wood but only recently. The trouble is mostly with other meds: I take a calcium channel blocker (norvasc) as one of my BP meds which I belive has some inhibiting effect, but I'll have to live with it as its one of the few things to keep my BP under some control. I was also taking Proscar (for a slightly enlarged prostate) which is reknown for killing libido. This lead to quite a variety of things for trying to get erections, ranging from Viagra (very short lived action, not worth the side effects) to penile injections (with Bimix; and unlike my IM injections, they hurt like hell - although they did work.) The best by far, and most natural, was my depo-t. I switched to Saw Palmetto for the prostate, with surprisingly little argument from the Dr., and so far it seems to do just as good a job as Proscar without the side effects. If that changes, I'll have to re-evaluate. I was also on both Celexa and its more potent relative Lexapro (it wasn't for depression, per se; the Dr had tried just about every BP med known to man and he figured, what the heck, he'll try the psychological angle, if only to say it was tried - didn't work.) These two pills are really amazing, and I don't mean that in a nice way. As others have reported, they can be anorgasmic. I totally agree, they act like an " off-switch " . The hell of it is, you can have some libido at this point but with either of these pills you can't have an orgasm, period. This is like some exquisite form of torture. They seem to wash out of the system after 24hrs (with me, anyway) and then I'm back to normal. I was only an occasional user of the stuff, anyway. Re the arimidex, I've got one of those systems that seems way too sensitive to doses. I've learned the hard way on a great many medicines, the smaller the dose the better. I've had a few Drs that loved to start on a larger dose than I could handle and the side effects would just about kill me. I hope I might the luxury of basing doses of arimidex on this new found morning wood but in any event I think I've got a rough idea on the size of the dose to take. I'm also a type II diabetic, but I don't think the nerves have degenerated that much, not yet. I'll be 61 next month and I feel in better shape now (with morning wood, even) then I did a decade ago. Also: I first read The Recipe For Success on the Meso-rx site. I just noticed the HGC Update and that really makes more sense than the daily 100iu doses of HCG that I've been taking. I don't mind daily injections at all, but I got the impression that they were sort of wasted that way. I really don't need the extra little hit of T every day - except maybe at the end of my weekly run, as described in the article and even then I doubt I'll need much. I'll try the two 250iu doses, first. Rich > > - I was really fascinated by your on-going account of your > > husband and letrozole. How did that turn out? ----- > > > > I'm playing catch up here since I don't seem to be able to keep > up. > > > > If you're still here, Rich, and Phil who also asked, Hubby's last > > dose of letrozole was at least a few months ago. During the time > > that he was taking increasing lower doses of the med he lost a > > significant number of inches around first his chest and then his > > waist. He still has the gyno (guy tits) but I figure that a good > > number of aromatase/estrogen receptor sites were lost along with > the > > fat. We never did get the letrozole dose down to the point of > > striking a balance without driving his estrogen levels too low, but > > the whole process gave him a jump start in losing the estrogen > > conversion and resulting fat and diabetic tendencies. > > > > Because the inches still seem to be coming off, although slower, he > > hasn't wanted to go back onto the letrozole. Because I worry about > > cardiac risks related to overweight, it's a relief to me to see the > > inches diminishing. And I can't say I miss subdividing the pills! > > > > ----Right now I have scripts for both arimidex and letrozole but so > > far have only used the arimidex. I'm a little leery of trying the > > letrozole after seeing the miniscule amount of a dose you had > worked > > down to - something like 1/48 of a pill? You could put that on a > head > > of a pin and still leave room for " the angels to dance. " lol'---- > > > > Letrozole is a stronger med than arimidex, but keep in mind that my > > husband is not taking supplemental testosterone, so probably a > > correct balanced dose for him would be much lower than for men on > > TRT. But you're right, if he decides at some point to go back on > it, > > the next dose we try will be a tiny pinch of the ground powder of a > > single tablet. > > > > -----I always wondered why you didn't just switch over to the less > > potent arimidex to lower the E2.---- > > > > In a word: economics. We didn't go through our insurance, but paid > > out of pocket. And given the tiny amount required we have a > lifetime > > supply (or at least enough to last until the expiration date.) > > > > Hope you're having good results with the arimidex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Rich I ballooned up to 325 I was on the gels and my joints and muscle hurt so back when I stood up I could hardly walk. Going on the shots and HCG my Total T went up from 650 to 1087 and my pain went away. I joined Weight Watchers and last yr lost over 65 lbs and was back to walking everyday and started going to the gym and working out on 16 machines working the 11 major muscle groups. Hell I was doing great then came winter and I came down with Bronchitis and could not get over it had it for over 3 months put on 20 lbs and still having a hard time breathing. My Dr. has me on a med Spirva Handihaler to get rid of the inflation in my lungs so things are getting better and I will get back out walking and to the gym again. I am 5' 10 " also but a big I mean big boned guy. Dr. wants me to only go down to 225 lbs. So if I could do so can you. All it took for me was to get my levels up. Phil Rich <caliconine@...> wrote: Hi Dan- I can remember weighing 160, in my " yoot " (around in my mid-40s, lol.) Even in my 50's I stayed around 180 (I'm 5'10'') then I ballooned. It seemed to coincide with the diabetes (right now I'm at 215, and it ain't budging, up or down) but I think the infamous " diabetic gut " is really a cop-out. When I get this testosterone business really fine tuned, I'll either burn it off, or I won't care because if that doesn't do it, nothing will. Rich > > Hey Rich and - Thought I would throw in my experience too. > > I was running ~ 56 on E2 shooting 60 to 80 mg/7 days of DEPO T. Started out on Arimidex at 0.25 mg every 7 days on the day of my shot. Didn't feel great but OK. Got tested 6 weeks later and found my E2 had dropped to < 15. Since then I have dropped the arimidex to 0.25 mg every 14 days and take it 24 hours after my T shot. My reasoning for this is that half life of arimidex is ~ 48 hours and you get the spike of Depo 48-72 hours. > > I have been doing this for ~ 4 weeks now with great results. I have not been tested yet but I feel good. Just another data point. I am 47 and weigh 160. > > Arkansas > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.