Guest guest Posted December 26, 2010 Report Share Posted December 26, 2010 Very interesting. Here's the whole article posted at National Health Federation. http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=633 [Moderator's note: The article ends with this information: " Addendum: Sadly, the treatment you have just read about is not available anywhere..... " -Bill Sardi ] This page has archived articles by Bill Sardi, 11 about Cancer. http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi-arch.html Bill Sardi's website http://www.naturalhealthlibrarian.com/ " D. " <parisd2002@...> wrote: > > I normally do not post but am curious to hear if someone knows more about the following: > > Cancer Cured For Good - By Bill Sardi and Hubbell October 2008 > > It works 100% of the time to eradicate cancer completely, and cancer does not recur even years later. That is how researchers describe the most convincing cancer cure ever announced. The weekly injection of just 100 billionths of a gram of a harmless glyco-protein (a naturally-produced molecule with a sugar component and a protein component) activates the human immune system and cures cancer for good, according to human studies among breast cancer and colon cancer patients, producing complete remissions lasting 4 and 7 years respectively. This glyco-protein cure is totally without side effect but currently goes unused by cancer doctors. Normal Gc protein (also called Vitamin-D binding protein) , an abundant glyco-protein found in human blood serum, becomes the molecular switch to activate macrophages when it is converted to its active form, called Gc macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF). Gc protein is normally activated by conversion to Gc-MAF with the help of the B and T cells (bone marrow-made and thymus gland-made white blood cells). But, as researchers explain it themselves, cancer cells secrete an enzyme known as alpha-N- acetylgalactosaminidase (also called Nagalase) that completely blocks conversion of Gc protein to Gc-MAF, preventing tumor-cell killing by the macrophages. This is the way cancer cells escape detection and destruction, by disengaging the human immune system. This also leaves cancer patients prone to infections and many then succumb to pneumonia or other infections. The once-weekly injection of minute amounts of Gc-MAF, just 100 nanograms (billionths of a gram), activates macrophages and allows the immune system to pursue cancer cells with vigor, sufficient to produce total long-term cures in humans. Nobuto Yamamoto, director of the Division of Cancer Immunology and Molecular Biology, Socrates Institute for Therapeutic Immunology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, says this is " probably the most potent macrophage activating factor ever discovered. " A MACROPHAGE OVERCOMES AND EATS A CANCER CELL. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2010 Report Share Posted December 27, 2010 ParisD- I spend much of my day, week on the internet posting in cancer forums, looking for articles and studies to post on peoplebeatingcancer.org- I have done this for the past several years and I have never heard about the National Health Federation or the cancer cure that is talked about. Having said this, I don't claim to know all in the cancer world. I will keep my eyes open and try to learn more about this organization and the cancer therapy they discuss. Like all cancer survivors I will cross my fingers and hope. Emerson cancer survivor since 3/94 founder, director of the Galen Foundation and peoplebeatingcancer.org http://peoplebeatingcancer.org/ _____________________________ " skpounds14 " wrote: > > Very interesting. Here's the whole article posted at National Health Federation. http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=633 > > [Moderator's note: The article ends with this information: > " Addendum: Sadly, the treatment you have just read about is not available anywhere..... " -Bill Sardi ] _________________________________ " D. " <parisd2002@...> wrote: > > I normally do not post but am curious to hear if someone knows more about the following: Cancer Cured For Good - By Bill Sardi and Hubbell October 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 The NHF just reposted the article and I don't know about them either, I just posted the whole article for people to read. About the Original posters question, it may related to Mr. Sardi's cancer book at http://www.thecancerbook.com/ It kind of sounds like it, could email him and ask. Other Cancer info by Mr. Sardi and verified by 2 books is a fairly inexpensive supplement called IP-6. The Overlooked Cancer Cure From Japan http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi39.html IP-6 Cleanse & Benefits http://www.life-enthusiast.com/index/Articles/Sardi/Cleanse:_Rice_Bran -SOURCES- Swanson brand is the best priced with few fillers. http://www.swansonvitamins.com/SWU286/ItemDetail?n=0 iherb, vitacost, vitaminshoppe and others carry IP-6. Reviews at iherb, vitacost. -BOOKS- IP6: Nature's Revolutionary Cancer Fighter: Nature's Revolutionary Cancer-Fighter by Abulkalam M. Shamsuddin http://amzn.to/hLq6lQ Nature's Ultimate Anti-Cancer Pill: The IP-6 with Inositol Question and Answer Book by L Coles http://amzn.to/fc4aNI 2 time cancer survivor (2002,05) > > ParisD- > > I spend much of my day, week on the internet posting in cancer forums, looking for articles and studies to post on peoplebeatingcancer.org- I have done this for the past several years and I have never heard about the National Health Federation or the cancer cure that is talked about. > > Having said this, I don't claim to know all in the cancer world. I > will keep my eyes open and try to learn more about this organization > and the cancer therapy they discuss. Like all cancer survivors I will cross my fingers and hope. > > Emerson > cancer survivor since 3/94 > founder, director of the Galen Foundation and peoplebeatingcancer.org > http://peoplebeatingcancer.org/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 dear david and skpounds14, I do not know and not trying to know about National Health Federation (not my post), it could really be a fake federation, simply a name taken by a website. I am intrigated by GcMAF results, if you google it there are lot of information on it. What worries me is that those promoting this treatment considered the success by looking at the dropping nagalase serum (not the PSA in case of PCa) claiming that Nagalase is a perfect indicator of the cancer tumor burden. This is something new to me, dont know if this is true. " skpounds14 " wrote: > > The NHF just reposted the article and I don't know about them either, I just posted the whole article for people to read. > > About the Original posters question, it may related to Mr. Sardi's cancer book at http://www.thecancerbook.com/ It kind of sounds like it, could email him and ask. > > Emerson <daviddecemerson@> wrote: > > > > ParisD- > > I spend much of my day, week on the internet posting in cancer forums, looking for articles and studies to post on peoplebeatingcancer.org- I have done this for the past several years and I have never heard about the National Health Federation or the cancer cure that is talked about...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 28, 2010 Report Share Posted December 28, 2010 it has been on the net for a good number of years. just google Yamamoto, cancer and you will find some information but you will also find this: do not contact Dr Yamamoto. He cannot help you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2011 Report Share Posted January 3, 2011 I looked into this one a bit. A good discussion here: http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2008/12/03/cancer-cured-for-good-gc- maf-and-the-miracle-cure/ It seems that the research is good, though not comprehensive. " Gc-MAF I have extensive knowledge on Gc-MAF. First of all, the lack of " side effects " as per Dr. Yamamoto is relative to the harsh side effects of chemotherapies and antiretrovirals. The fact is, Gc-MAF results in high levels of TNF-alpha production and other cytokines which in effect cause side effects such as severe fatigue, feverishness, and depression in some patients. Basically, " sickness behaviour " . This is due to the immune system activation, no different from taking strong immune boosters or pharmaceutical interferons. The Gc-MAF made in the western USA and shipped to Europe is PURE, and as a matter of fact, the scientist who participated in its production is one of the top researchers in Gc-MAF from southeast Asia, who was retained to help produce it. The deleterious side of Gc-MAF is well known in the scientific community by those researchers who are working on synthetic mimics of Gc-MAF who are working on tweaking the protein to be able to induce macrophage activation without the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, all patient's using Gc-MAF that is currently made in the USA and shipped to Europe experience fatigue and distress during therapy. I can only predict that CFS sufferers will feel miserable during such therapy and should be supervised by doctors. " http://www.prohealth.com/me-cfs/blog/boardDetail.cfm?id=1379980 A descrioption on that page: " Dr. Yamamoto's discoveries are related to the role of the macrophage in the immune system. The macrophage, of course, is the Field Marshall of the immune system. In a healthy human body, damaged cells release the components of the cell membranes into the interstitial fluids and thence into the blood stream. These are lysophospholipids. They serve as a cytokine (or chemical activator) for the B cells. The B cells produce an enzyme called beta galactosidase in response to the lysophospholipids. The enzyme is located on the surface of the cell membrane. There is a protein in the blood stream known as " Vitamin D Binding Protein " or " Group Specific Component " or " Gc. " We'll use Gc here. At one specific site on the protein, there is a three-sugar entity attached. The first sugar is attached to the protein, and the second and third sugars are attached to the first. In Dr. Yamamoto's papers this is described as a dibranched trisaccharide. The B cell's enzyme cleaves sugar #3, and an enzyme on the cell surface of the T-cells (always resident) can then cleave sugar #2. (If you want all the names, read the Prostate Cancer paper published in Translational Oncology at http://www.transonc.com/pdf/manuscript/v01i02/neo08106.pdf.) The Gc protein is then left with only sugar #1 of the original three. That resulting molecule is what activates the macrophages. Dr. Y states that it is the most powerful macrophage activating factor ever discovered. However, both cancer and viruses release an enzyme (Nagalase) into the blood stream that cleaves all three sugars in that entity. With all three removed, there is no way the body can convert it to GcMAF, because sugar #1 must be left in place. Cancers and viruses disable the immune system by destroying (deglycosylating) the Gc protein that is the precursor of GcMAF. With little or no Gc protein, there is little or no GcMAF. With little or no GcMAF there is little or no activation of the macrophages. With little or no activation of the macrophages . . . . Dr. Y extracts Gc protein from a healthy volunteer's blood and uses the two enzymes found in B-cells and T-cells to cleave sugars #3 and #2, thereby producing GcMAF in the lab. That GcMAF is then injected into the vein of the patient and begins the process of activating the macrophages. The dosage is 100 nanagrams (or one ten-millionth of a gram). Increasing the dosage will not increase the macrophage activation. GcMAF has been tested at ten times the maximum effective dose (one millionth of a gram) without any adverse side effects. Even in a healthy person, it exhibits no side effects. Within 4 hours the ingestive rate (phagocytic rate) of the macrophage increases 30-fold. In about 4 days, the number of macrophages will have increased about 40-fold. The amount of superoxide produced by the macrophage increases 15-fold. So, 40 times as many macrophages gobbling up things at 30 time the rate . . .. . You do the math. GcMAF is not disease-specific, because the macrophage is not disease-specific. If there is a protein or organism in the ailing body that the macrophages should be attacking, they will do so when GcMAF is administered. Curing CFIDS would probably take about 5 to 10 IV injections (at one per week). Sometime in the future, research will prove that CFIDS is a viral disease -- probably a recombinant virus formed by rubella fragments and a retrovirus. But activated macrophages do not care where it came from. If it's not normal, they'll destroy it. That was the good news. What follows is the unhappy news. GcMAF does have an Achilles Heel -- prescription drugs. Certain drugs prevent the activation of the macrophages. They include all pain-killers (even Novacaine), blood pressure meds, and steroids. There is no comprehensive list of the drugs that interfere with macrophage activation, so the safest course for anyone using GcMAF is to refrain from ANY drug use. This is somewhere between difficult and impossible in some extremely late-stage cancer patients. Also, GcMAF is not available in the United States. Nor, to my knowledge, is it available anywhere on earth. But I am hoping that it will be made available somewhere within the next year. There is a cancer clinic in the Bahamas that has been producing and administering what they say is GcMAF, but their results have been dismal. I have it on good authority that the product has been analyzed by a researcher and found to have little or no activity. Another counterfeit version is being sold by a fellow in the western United States, but he is careful to only ship it out of the US. I have reliable reports of adverse reactions to that product. GcMAF is very, very difficult to make, requiring extremely exact laboratory procedures. Only highly-qualified scientists with an intimate knowledge of certain key steps are able to produce it, so it is unlikely to show up on the black market. Also, not all reagents and biologicals are the same, even though they have the same names and formulae on the labels. More than one batch has been lost, because of sub-standard reagents and biologicals. I am not one of those who can produce it. If I had CFIDS and could not get GcMAF, I would be investigating photoluminescence, intravenous hydrogen peroxide, and intravenous polymannans (extracted from aloe vera). I am sorry that I am not allowed to post information on how to obtain those treatments. They are all legal. A prescription for the polymannans must be filled by a compounding pharmacist. I hoe you find this useful. If I can help you with anything else, let me know. " An opinion piece on 'cures': " A " new concept " drug is said to cost over a billion dollars to get through the (often needless) FDA testing. If you read Dr. Marcia Angell's book, you learn that the entire testing approval process is corrupt. One of the reasons that FDA testing costs so much is that they require such large experimental groups. They require large experimental groups, because (a) most drugs do not show much improvement over (1) existing drugs or (2) no drugs at all and ( most drugs are quite toxic. To get statistically reliable data on a drug that shows only a slight effect requires a large experimental population. If GcMAF were evaluated on a purely scientific basis, it could be done with fewer than a thousand experimental subjects in less than a year. The reasons that I say that are that (a) GcMAF shows incomparable results (complete cures) in nearly 100% of patients and ( has no toxicity. But I seriously doubt that the FDA would even dream of allowing that. In this case, if GcMAF were to be approved by the FDA, it would cause unemployment in the health care industry that could be measured on a seismograph and scored on the Richter Scale. Getting such a revolutionary discovery to market would require the wisdom of . If you know how to do it, I'd love to learn how. And I bet Dr. Y would too. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.