Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway? Experiences?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I think all of the treatment options - traditional or alternative - are all

iffy as to whether or not they will work long term... we are all gambling on

remission here aren't we? (except those of us who do RAI or surgery - they

have pretty much guaranteed a life time of replacement hormones.) Yet

regardless of treatment choice, we are all supposed to have the same goal -

to get our health back - so does it really matter if some of us want to try

different ways to reach that goal? Or that we are willing to find ways to

make that happen?

But a *luxury of the upper classes* to do alt med? I really doubt that alt

med is a luxury based on class, and so would you if you went and sat in the

waiting room at my natural health clinic or another of my ND's offices - you

will see all walks of life there, believe me.

I'm fortunate in that my health insurance (now there is a luxury of the

upper class) covers visits to naturopaths. Realistically though, if I didn't

have insurance at all, alt med would cost LESS than traditional med -

because most NDs charge less than most MDs and, if everything goes as

planned, alt med is going to heal ALL of me, and remission is going to stick

for a very long time, and I won't have to do this all over again any time

soon. And if you really want to get into the details, a lot of the

lifestyle changes we are talking about are FREE (yoga, meditation,

relaxation, etc.), and cooking whole foods cost less that buying prepared,

processed foods, etc etc etc.

But this is *my* gamble, not yours, so why is it you seem to have a problem

with it?

Pam B.

-- RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

Experiences?

yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few, have

an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not work,

over a long period of time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about foods... are there foods that are better for people with GD?

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

Experiences?

yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few, have

an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not work,

over a long period of time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talking about foods... are there foods that are better for people with GD?

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

Experiences?

yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few, have

an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not work,

over a long period of time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

chocolate - in particular - is a rquested e.g.!

Velvet - who has felt really rotten all day and wishes she had some Chocolate of

Consulation!

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

Experiences?

yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few, have

an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not work,

over a long period of time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I have to agree that traditional medicine can be a luxury of the upper

classes.

The one endocrinologist I saw in Iowa cost $350 just for the appointment -

it was another $250+ for labwork. The med school student took all the

history and preliminary stuff (wonder if she gets any pay for that) so the

endo was with me for maybe a total of 10 minutes. And all I got was a

confirmation of diagnosis and " just have RAI and you'll be fine " speech.

Thank whatever higher power you believe in that I had insurance to cover

that. I could get a whole lotta alternative treatment for that kind of

money. Gee, in fact I do! I spend about $20 - $30 on vitamins and such and

that lasts me anywhere from 2-4 months, depending on the size of the bottle.

And that's done a whole hell of a lot more for me than the endocrinologist

ever did.

And then there's the rhuematologist that I saw for another $250 because my

regular doc freaked out at a positive ANA titer and thought I had lupus,

even though I had no symptoms. Had he done some relatively simple research

that I did, he might have found out that a low ANA titer can be common in AI

diseases with Graves'. So I went to the rhuemy and had $200 more labwork

done to confirm what I already knew - that I didn't have lupus. Yes, it's

better to know for sure, but I'd have been comfortable being fairly certain

and saving the money had I not had the _luxury_ of health insurance.

And then the absolutely ridiculous bills ($5000 just for the hospital

alone!) for my daughter's broken arm. She didn't stay in the hospital she

didn't need surgery, but because they used *the surgical room* while they

casted her, we had to pay outrageous sums for that. I went through those

bills and some of the charges - if that's not an example of traditional

medicine waste, I don't know what is. Then you have to go to the orthopedic

doctor (charge for the visit) to have it X-rayed every few weeks (charge for

that) and then have the doctor look at the X-ray and tell you that " yes,

it's healing " . Wish there was a homeopathic rememdy for broken arms.

And we pay for our own private insuance because my husband was

self-employed. It's damn expensive, but now it's no longer a " luxury " , it's

a necessity. With my Graves' and his diabetes and 3 children and doctor

bills like that, we can't afford to _not_ have insurance. We scrape to make

the payment, but we don't really have much choice. If we ever lose this

insurance, my husband's diabetes and any ailments _related_ to diabetes

(which could be just about anything) would not likely be covered under any

other insurance because of the evil " pre-existing conditions " clauses. If

there were any reliable alternative med treatment for diabetes, I'd have him

do it in a minute. It would be _far cheaper_.

Now, I don't want to get off on a rant here...oops, too late, I already did!

, who considered deleting this after she wrote it because it's so OT

now, but figured that most people can relate/agree at the tragedy that is

the health care system.

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

> Experiences?

>

> yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few,

have

> an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not

work,

> over a long period of time

>

>

> -------------------------------------

> The Graves' list is intended for informational purposes only and is not

intended to replace expert medical care.

> Please consult your doctor before changing or trying new treatments.

> ----------------------------------------

> DISCLAIMER

>

> Advertisments placed on this yahoo groups list do not have the endorsement

of

> the listowner. I have no input as to what ads are attached to emails.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, I have to agree that traditional medicine can be a luxury of the upper

classes.

The one endocrinologist I saw in Iowa cost $350 just for the appointment -

it was another $250+ for labwork. The med school student took all the

history and preliminary stuff (wonder if she gets any pay for that) so the

endo was with me for maybe a total of 10 minutes. And all I got was a

confirmation of diagnosis and " just have RAI and you'll be fine " speech.

Thank whatever higher power you believe in that I had insurance to cover

that. I could get a whole lotta alternative treatment for that kind of

money. Gee, in fact I do! I spend about $20 - $30 on vitamins and such and

that lasts me anywhere from 2-4 months, depending on the size of the bottle.

And that's done a whole hell of a lot more for me than the endocrinologist

ever did.

And then there's the rhuematologist that I saw for another $250 because my

regular doc freaked out at a positive ANA titer and thought I had lupus,

even though I had no symptoms. Had he done some relatively simple research

that I did, he might have found out that a low ANA titer can be common in AI

diseases with Graves'. So I went to the rhuemy and had $200 more labwork

done to confirm what I already knew - that I didn't have lupus. Yes, it's

better to know for sure, but I'd have been comfortable being fairly certain

and saving the money had I not had the _luxury_ of health insurance.

And then the absolutely ridiculous bills ($5000 just for the hospital

alone!) for my daughter's broken arm. She didn't stay in the hospital she

didn't need surgery, but because they used *the surgical room* while they

casted her, we had to pay outrageous sums for that. I went through those

bills and some of the charges - if that's not an example of traditional

medicine waste, I don't know what is. Then you have to go to the orthopedic

doctor (charge for the visit) to have it X-rayed every few weeks (charge for

that) and then have the doctor look at the X-ray and tell you that " yes,

it's healing " . Wish there was a homeopathic rememdy for broken arms.

And we pay for our own private insuance because my husband was

self-employed. It's damn expensive, but now it's no longer a " luxury " , it's

a necessity. With my Graves' and his diabetes and 3 children and doctor

bills like that, we can't afford to _not_ have insurance. We scrape to make

the payment, but we don't really have much choice. If we ever lose this

insurance, my husband's diabetes and any ailments _related_ to diabetes

(which could be just about anything) would not likely be covered under any

other insurance because of the evil " pre-existing conditions " clauses. If

there were any reliable alternative med treatment for diabetes, I'd have him

do it in a minute. It would be _far cheaper_.

Now, I don't want to get off on a rant here...oops, too late, I already did!

, who considered deleting this after she wrote it because it's so OT

now, but figured that most people can relate/agree at the tragedy that is

the health care system.

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

> Experiences?

>

> yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few,

have

> an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not

work,

> over a long period of time

>

>

> -------------------------------------

> The Graves' list is intended for informational purposes only and is not

intended to replace expert medical care.

> Please consult your doctor before changing or trying new treatments.

> ----------------------------------------

> DISCLAIMER

>

> Advertisments placed on this yahoo groups list do not have the endorsement

of

> the listowner. I have no input as to what ads are attached to emails.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

Pam B wrote:

> I think all of the treatment options - traditional or

alternative - are all

> iffy as to whether or not they will work long term... we are

all gambling on

> remission here aren't we? (except those of us who do RAI or

surgery - they

> have pretty much guaranteed a life time of replacement hormones.)

I've pretty much abandoned any hope of remission.

I don't know how other who were diagnosed a decade or more ago

feel, but apart from the gap after surgery, I've had this for

the majority of my life with no evidence that I'll ever be able

to stop the ATD even for short periods.

On that basis I'm more hopeful of improvements in treatment than

achieving lasting remission through ATD. My main concerns over

RAI are risk to the eyes (heck if the hyper bits is aggressive

what hope if I trigger infiltrative eye disease), and (probable)

subsequence hypothyroidism.

I just know the day I swallow 10 microcuries, they'll announce

that Graves is caused by; sitting too close to computers /

helicobacter pylori or similar.

I'm also pessimistic on my chances of escaping other autoimmune

diseases. Just I seem to have the " hyper " bit of Graves more

aggressively than other family members, and from what I can

gather quite a few others. Afraid I also tend to ponder my

family history, and although there aren't many examples to draw

on, I do wonder if paying into a pension scheme is the rational

thing to do.

Some reassurance has been offered by various antibody tests, but

I can't really convince myself these doctors really have much

of a clue about genuine causes.

> Yet

> regardless of treatment choice, we are all supposed to have

the same goal -

> to get our health back - so does it really matter if some of

us want to try

> different ways to reach that goal? Or that we are willing to

find ways to

> make that happen?

On the basis I want a break through in treatment - I suppose I

should be encouraging you all to join up to risky drug trials,

or to try out radical alternative therapies ;-)

> But a *luxury of the upper classes* to do alt med?

I think the original poster said a luxury to try treatments that

might not work.

I can't see what class has to do with it either, but then us

Brits tend to regard class and money as almost completely unrelated.

I agree with the sentiment on suspect treatments. Since I'm

convinced some alternative treatments do work I didn't read it

as a reference to alternative medicine, just the less convincing

treatments of all sorts - orbital radiation treatment anyone?

> alt med would cost LESS than traditional med -

> because most NDs charge less than most MDs

Have you ever pondered why? Although I don't think it is a

simple answer, I've had this debate with my GP, who had some

fascinating comment to make on the " cliche " nature of medical

qualifications, and market forces. Of course market forces take

a battering in the UK due to the nationalise system of healthcare.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+XmegGFXfHI9FVgYRAmqgAJ9F5SCMIC8R9K96YeGgUjE4XldRWACg1zSo

Xw2zMHtnMaM7iS3yKkxOTIE=

=iOwe

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

Pam B wrote:

> I think all of the treatment options - traditional or

alternative - are all

> iffy as to whether or not they will work long term... we are

all gambling on

> remission here aren't we? (except those of us who do RAI or

surgery - they

> have pretty much guaranteed a life time of replacement hormones.)

I've pretty much abandoned any hope of remission.

I don't know how other who were diagnosed a decade or more ago

feel, but apart from the gap after surgery, I've had this for

the majority of my life with no evidence that I'll ever be able

to stop the ATD even for short periods.

On that basis I'm more hopeful of improvements in treatment than

achieving lasting remission through ATD. My main concerns over

RAI are risk to the eyes (heck if the hyper bits is aggressive

what hope if I trigger infiltrative eye disease), and (probable)

subsequence hypothyroidism.

I just know the day I swallow 10 microcuries, they'll announce

that Graves is caused by; sitting too close to computers /

helicobacter pylori or similar.

I'm also pessimistic on my chances of escaping other autoimmune

diseases. Just I seem to have the " hyper " bit of Graves more

aggressively than other family members, and from what I can

gather quite a few others. Afraid I also tend to ponder my

family history, and although there aren't many examples to draw

on, I do wonder if paying into a pension scheme is the rational

thing to do.

Some reassurance has been offered by various antibody tests, but

I can't really convince myself these doctors really have much

of a clue about genuine causes.

> Yet

> regardless of treatment choice, we are all supposed to have

the same goal -

> to get our health back - so does it really matter if some of

us want to try

> different ways to reach that goal? Or that we are willing to

find ways to

> make that happen?

On the basis I want a break through in treatment - I suppose I

should be encouraging you all to join up to risky drug trials,

or to try out radical alternative therapies ;-)

> But a *luxury of the upper classes* to do alt med?

I think the original poster said a luxury to try treatments that

might not work.

I can't see what class has to do with it either, but then us

Brits tend to regard class and money as almost completely unrelated.

I agree with the sentiment on suspect treatments. Since I'm

convinced some alternative treatments do work I didn't read it

as a reference to alternative medicine, just the less convincing

treatments of all sorts - orbital radiation treatment anyone?

> alt med would cost LESS than traditional med -

> because most NDs charge less than most MDs

Have you ever pondered why? Although I don't think it is a

simple answer, I've had this debate with my GP, who had some

fascinating comment to make on the " cliche " nature of medical

qualifications, and market forces. Of course market forces take

a battering in the UK due to the nationalise system of healthcare.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+XmegGFXfHI9FVgYRAmqgAJ9F5SCMIC8R9K96YeGgUjE4XldRWACg1zSo

Xw2zMHtnMaM7iS3yKkxOTIE=

=iOwe

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say here that I don't believe that chocolate is anti anybody and that

if a miracle cure is going to come from anywhere I wouldn't put it passed that

miraculous substance to be as ripe as any to prove the - end - of it all

Velvet - who rather approves of the Belgiums all things being equal!

Re: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway? Experiences?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

Pam B wrote:

> I think all of the treatment options - traditional or

alternative - are all

> iffy as to whether or not they will work long term... we are

all gambling on

> remission here aren't we? (except those of us who do RAI or

surgery - they

> have pretty much guaranteed a life time of replacement hormones.)

I've pretty much abandoned any hope of remission.

I don't know how other who were diagnosed a decade or more ago

feel, but apart from the gap after surgery, I've had this for

the majority of my life with no evidence that I'll ever be able

to stop the ATD even for short periods.

On that basis I'm more hopeful of improvements in treatment than

achieving lasting remission through ATD. My main concerns over

RAI are risk to the eyes (heck if the hyper bits is aggressive

what hope if I trigger infiltrative eye disease), and (probable)

subsequence hypothyroidism.

I just know the day I swallow 10 microcuries, they'll announce

that Graves is caused by; sitting too close to computers /

helicobacter pylori or similar.

I'm also pessimistic on my chances of escaping other autoimmune

diseases. Just I seem to have the " hyper " bit of Graves more

aggressively than other family members, and from what I can

gather quite a few others. Afraid I also tend to ponder my

family history, and although there aren't many examples to draw

on, I do wonder if paying into a pension scheme is the rational

thing to do.

Some reassurance has been offered by various antibody tests, but

I can't really convince myself these doctors really have much

of a clue about genuine causes.

> Yet

> regardless of treatment choice, we are all supposed to have

the same goal -

> to get our health back - so does it really matter if some of

us want to try

> different ways to reach that goal? Or that we are willing to

find ways to

> make that happen?

On the basis I want a break through in treatment - I suppose I

should be encouraging you all to join up to risky drug trials,

or to try out radical alternative therapies ;-)

> But a *luxury of the upper classes* to do alt med?

I think the original poster said a luxury to try treatments that

might not work.

I can't see what class has to do with it either, but then us

Brits tend to regard class and money as almost completely unrelated.

I agree with the sentiment on suspect treatments. Since I'm

convinced some alternative treatments do work I didn't read it

as a reference to alternative medicine, just the less convincing

treatments of all sorts - orbital radiation treatment anyone?

> alt med would cost LESS than traditional med -

> because most NDs charge less than most MDs

Have you ever pondered why? Although I don't think it is a

simple answer, I've had this debate with my GP, who had some

fascinating comment to make on the " cliche " nature of medical

qualifications, and market forces. Of course market forces take

a battering in the UK due to the nationalise system of healthcare.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+XmegGFXfHI9FVgYRAmqgAJ9F5SCMIC8R9K96YeGgUjE4XldRWACg1zSo

Xw2zMHtnMaM7iS3yKkxOTIE=

=iOwe

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sincerely hope I dont have to put up with this for the rest of my life I have

a major business I want to build. Actually - sod it - WILL build despite all.

But I wonder if I have something in addition to Graves as I don't seem to feel

much better despite medication and offers of RAI (which I won't now have) .

Surely there is more to this than feeling rotten for large chunks of the day or

night in no particular order or sense?

Velvet - who thinks she will research antibodies ...and wonders if dialysis

wouldn't clean some of 'em out of the blood...on a regular basis until the body

learned to cool down and relax its innards why only kidney stuff treatable

by that method - when one comes to think of it?

Re: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway? Experiences?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

Pam B wrote:

> I think all of the treatment options - traditional or

alternative - are all

> iffy as to whether or not they will work long term... we are

all gambling on

> remission here aren't we? (except those of us who do RAI or

surgery - they

> have pretty much guaranteed a life time of replacement hormones.)

I've pretty much abandoned any hope of remission.

I don't know how other who were diagnosed a decade or more ago

feel, but apart from the gap after surgery, I've had this for

the majority of my life with no evidence that I'll ever be able

to stop the ATD even for short periods.

On that basis I'm more hopeful of improvements in treatment than

achieving lasting remission through ATD. My main concerns over

RAI are risk to the eyes (heck if the hyper bits is aggressive

what hope if I trigger infiltrative eye disease), and (probable)

subsequence hypothyroidism.

I just know the day I swallow 10 microcuries, they'll announce

that Graves is caused by; sitting too close to computers /

helicobacter pylori or similar.

I'm also pessimistic on my chances of escaping other autoimmune

diseases. Just I seem to have the " hyper " bit of Graves more

aggressively than other family members, and from what I can

gather quite a few others. Afraid I also tend to ponder my

family history, and although there aren't many examples to draw

on, I do wonder if paying into a pension scheme is the rational

thing to do.

Some reassurance has been offered by various antibody tests, but

I can't really convince myself these doctors really have much

of a clue about genuine causes.

> Yet

> regardless of treatment choice, we are all supposed to have

the same goal -

> to get our health back - so does it really matter if some of

us want to try

> different ways to reach that goal? Or that we are willing to

find ways to

> make that happen?

On the basis I want a break through in treatment - I suppose I

should be encouraging you all to join up to risky drug trials,

or to try out radical alternative therapies ;-)

> But a *luxury of the upper classes* to do alt med?

I think the original poster said a luxury to try treatments that

might not work.

I can't see what class has to do with it either, but then us

Brits tend to regard class and money as almost completely unrelated.

I agree with the sentiment on suspect treatments. Since I'm

convinced some alternative treatments do work I didn't read it

as a reference to alternative medicine, just the less convincing

treatments of all sorts - orbital radiation treatment anyone?

> alt med would cost LESS than traditional med -

> because most NDs charge less than most MDs

Have you ever pondered why? Although I don't think it is a

simple answer, I've had this debate with my GP, who had some

fascinating comment to make on the " cliche " nature of medical

qualifications, and market forces. Of course market forces take

a battering in the UK due to the nationalise system of healthcare.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+XmegGFXfHI9FVgYRAmqgAJ9F5SCMIC8R9K96YeGgUjE4XldRWACg1zSo

Xw2zMHtnMaM7iS3yKkxOTIE=

=iOwe

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why are you even considering censoring yourself m'dear? don't your illness do

enough of that fer your life already? FILL your day with you!

if you must - you simply - must

RE: Re: How safe is homeopathy anyway?

> Experiences?

>

> yours is a luxury of the upper classes; not everyone, in fact very few,

have

> an opportunity to spend lots o' money on something that may or may not

work,

> over a long period of time

>

>

> -------------------------------------

> The Graves' list is intended for informational purposes only and is not

intended to replace expert medical care.

> Please consult your doctor before changing or trying new treatments.

> ----------------------------------------

> DISCLAIMER

>

> Advertisments placed on this yahoo groups list do not have the endorsement

of

> the listowner. I have no input as to what ads are attached to emails.

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big flaw here is thinking that RAI studies are scientific. They are not

really. Too many variables are uncontrolled. And true scientists would

recognize and criticize that. In a study that's peer reviewed by

scientists, that fact would be commented on by editorials or letters if that

study made it far enough to get published. Traditional medicine, like

alternative medicine is more an art than science. Physicians are not

scientists.

The problem with traditional medicine studies is how the studies are

interpreted not whether or not they're valid. And like anything else,

people see what they want to see.

As far as being safe and effective, if the only purpose of RAI is to destroy

the thyroid gland in hyperthyroid patients then it's very effective. And if

the only worry about it vs. surgery is that it avoids the immediate risks of

surgery, then it's very safe.

Anyhow, I'm no proponent of RAI. I've suffered the after-effects of it for

years.

Take care,

dx & RAI 1987 (at age 24)

" Scientific studies support the *myth*, in my opinion, that RAI is *safe*,

effective, the only way to go...that the very limited downsides of it are

downplayed...if I had the energy and time I would do everything I could to

find out where the money comes from for funding of these studies, the ones

that support this, is probaby from drug companies...they like the studies to

support *their* line of thinking. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...