Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Clear DayCardioversion of my husband is being planned. I asked his cardiologist about ways to reduce the risks of death (less than 1% I have read), which includes releasing blood clots. He said that the trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) could find blood clots better than the trans-thoracic echocardiogram), but that the cardiologist with other doctors decided that the TEE was a draw, considering his stated risks to the esophagus and vocal cords with the TEE. Risks to the esophagus and vocal cords are not as serious as risk of death, so I think my husband should have been offered the choice without having to ask. My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? Jo Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 I did not have a TEE when I had my cardioversion. I had to have an INR of between 2 and 3 consistently for 6 weeks -obviously was tested weekly--and then went in for the cardiovert. I think they also drew blood that morning when I was in the hospital. For me-- this was the easiest procedure I have ever had. Lil < jakarasek@... writes: My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Hi JoAnne Yes I think 3 weeks of INR between 2-3 is fine for a cardioversion for most people. I agree with you about being conservative where one's health is concerned and wish your husband the same positive cardioversion experience I had. As for spinach and INR...I like spinach too but since I have been on warfarin I have had almost none. I love brussel sprouts and I think Isabelle wrote about keeping the portion to about 6 of them...I keep my portions of green vegetables " reasonable, " unlike the days when I would scarf up an entire pound of asparagus and think nothing of it. Lil In a message dated 4/1/2006 3:27:25 PM Pacific Standard Time, jakarasek@... writes: So the doctor is proposing that if my husband's INR is normal next week, he will do a cardioversion. (He had just said the week before that he will do a cardioversion when my husband is normal 3 weeks in a row.) I like our doctors to be very conservative/safe about our health. I have read that 3 weeks of normal INR before the cardioversion and warfarin for 4 weeks after is the practice of one office. So I would feel better if my husband waited until he had 3 weeks of normal INR before the cardioversion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 I had the same experience as LIl. I have had three cardioversions. I have never had a TEE, but they did monitor my INR. No, a pacemaker was never mentioned. They told me there is always a chance of a problem during a cardioversion, but that is why ots done in the hospital setting. They said they were equiped to handle any problem that may come up. They evern fitten me for a throat tube before doing the cardioversion. They said under the conditions it was a very safe procedure. Kathy > > > > I did not have a TEE when I had my cardioversion. I had to have an INR of > between 2 and 3 consistently for 6 weeks -obviously was tested weekly--and then > went in for the cardiovert. I think they also drew blood that morning when I > was in the hospital. For me-- this was the easiest procedure I have ever had. > Lil > > < jakarasek@... writes: > > My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't > start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant > a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? > > For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against > death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus > be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Thank you, I so much appreciate how this group answers and tells what their experiences have been. My husband has had an INR between 2 and 3 only once in 6 weeks, and that was the third week. At first, he took multivitamins that had vitamin K in them so his INR was too low. Then the extra dosage of warfarin my husband's doctor gave him made my husband's INR too high. At the beginning, the doctor's office staff had advised my husband to eat the same amount of green vegetables every week to keep his INR steady. They didn't realize that spinach, which he likes, has 3 times as much vitamin K as the next closest green vegetable he eats. So when he ate spinach he got much more vitamin K. And then neither of us thought about the spinach salad we eat as being a green vegetable, but it most definitely is and has a very high amount of vitamin K. So the doctor is proposing that if my husband's INR is normal next week, he will do a cardioversion. (He had just said the week before that he will do a cardioversion when my husband is normal 3 weeks in a row.) I like our doctors to be very conservative/safe about our health. I have read that 3 weeks of normal INR before the cardioversion and warfarin for 4 weeks after is the practice of one office. So I would feel better if my husband waited until he had 3 weeks of normal INR before the cardioversion. Jo Anne Re: Cardioversion, TEE and pacemaker I did not have a TEE when I had my cardioversion. I had to have an INR of between 2 and 3 consistently for 6 weeks -obviously was tested weekly--and then went in for the cardiovert. I think they also drew blood that morning when I was in the hospital. For me-- this was the easiest procedure I have ever had. Lil < jakarasek@... writes: My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 Hi I had a TEE recently as I was scheduled to have an EPI, but went into AF a week before. At the hospital they would not do a cardioversion until the warfarin levels had been the same for 4 weeks. The cardiologist doing the EPI suggested doing the TEE, which was similar to having an endoscopy. I could not swallow the tube so they had to put me out in the end. I had the cardioversion a few days later and I have been fine in normal sinus rhythm. I just continued with the warfarin and beta blockers. I am now going in for an ablation tomorrow and had to stop the warfarin and have two injections of heparin 500 mg twice a day. My doctor said the reason they use heparin is because it does not stay in your system as long as warfarin. Seems a lot, but you have to trust what they are doing. Hopefully the ablation will work and I will be able to stop all the medication. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 Hi Kathy Why did they do three cardioversions? Did you have some success and then reverted to afib. The cardiologists told me that firstly it would be dangerous in my case because I had very low sinus rhythm of 30, then once I got the PM they said that it would be pointless anyway because of the easy that I can switch between nsr and afib. ine I had the same experience as LIl. I have had three cardioversions. I have never had a TEE, but they did monitor my INR. No, a pacemaker was never mentioned. They told me there is always a chance of a problem during a cardioversion, but that is why ots done in the hospital setting. They said they were equiped to handle any problem that may come up. They evern fitten me for a throat tube before doing the cardioversion. They said under the conditions it was a very safe procedure. Kathy > > > > I did not have a TEE when I had my cardioversion. I had to have an INR of > between 2 and 3 consistently for 6 weeks -obviously was tested weekly--and then > went in for the cardiovert. I think they also drew blood that morning when I > was in the hospital. For me-- this was the easiest procedure I have ever had. > Lil > > < jakarasek@... writes: > > My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't > start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant > a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? > > For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against > death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus > be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 ine, Yes, each of the cardioversions were about 6 months a part. I was in NSR in between episodes. Kathy > > > > > > > > I did not have a TEE when I had my cardioversion. I had to have an > INR of > > between 2 and 3 consistently for 6 weeks -obviously was tested > weekly--and then > > went in for the cardiovert. I think they also drew blood that > morning when I > > was in the hospital. For me-- this was the easiest procedure I > have ever had. > > Lil > > > > < > jakarasek@ writes: > > > > My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop > and won't > > start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so > they implant > > a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? > > > > For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge > against > > death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to > the esophagus > > be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 If your husband has been in afib for any time over 48 hours, he needs to be theraputically anti-coagulated for several weeks prior to the cardioversion AND still have a TEE to check for clots. The two are rather minor in comparison to a catastrophic stroke. I've had 9 cardioversions (7 in the first two months of this year!) and 3 TEE's. The worst thing that has happened during a cardioversion is that I once had " shallow " breathing upon awakening and had to be bagged.. that's from the anesthesia, and not the cardioversion. The worst problem with a TEE, is that I had to have two in a row (not recommended), since the first machine broke, and on the second my throat was already swollen, and they bruised my larynx... so I croaked like a sore frog for a couple days and had a raspy voice for a couple weeks.. but that's it! I have never heard of, or met anyone personally who has had a negative complication from either a cardioversion or a TEE. Both are worth the very small risk. No offense, but your cardiologist sounds like he's still in the dark ages... _____ From: AFIBsupport [mailto:AFIBsupport ] On Behalf Of J Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:05 AM To: AFIBsupport Subject: Cardioversion, TEE and pacemaker Clear DayCardioversion of my husband is being planned. I asked his cardiologist about ways to reduce the risks of death (less than 1% I have read), which includes releasing blood clots. He said that the trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) could find blood clots better than the trans-thoracic echocardiogram), but that the cardiologist with other doctors decided that the TEE was a draw, considering his stated risks to the esophagus and vocal cords with the TEE. Risks to the esophagus and vocal cords are not as serious as risk of death, so I think my husband should have been offered the choice without having to ask. My husband's cardiologist also said that some people's hearts stop and won't start with cardioversion (obviously a very low percentage), so they implant a pacemaker then and there. Has this happened to anyone here? For those who have had the TEE, would they recommend it as a hedge against death by blood clot with cardioversion? What ways can injury to the esophagus be protected against, other than getting a great surgeon? Jo Anne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2006 Report Share Posted April 5, 2006 Stefanie, I agree. I suspected there were serious problems, so I was checking out his advice, especially about having a cardioconversion with only one week of INR in the 2-3 range. We are getting a different doctor now. Thank you, Jo Anne RE: Cardioversion, TEE and pacemaker . . . No offense, but your cardiologist sounds like he's still in the dark ages... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.