Guest guest Posted July 17, 2006 Report Share Posted July 17, 2006 The story of the Christian EMT who was fired for refusing to transport a patient to an abortion has brought up some interesting discussions regarding the role of EMS. Some of us believe that EMS providers have the ability to turn down assignments that they feel are morally wrong. Some of us believe that we should do what we're paid and told to do. The reality is that because EMS is not yet an independent profession like law or medicine, we have limited (virtually no) ability to reject those cases we find morally repugnant. Even as a professional, if we reject those cases which are morally repugnant, we cannot rightfully expect our decision to be universally accepted, much less lauded by all. The ability to make decisions to accept a patient does not insulate you from the repurcussions of such. (In other words, if I was employed as a prosecutor for a DA and was told to take death penalty case, I could ethically refuse to take the case, but I'd have no legal recourse if the DA fired me.) -Wes Ogilvie, MPA, JD, EMT-B Austin, Texas ________________________________________________________________________ Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM. All on demand. Always Free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.