Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 So how many of you out there have been watching the news about the TABC over stepping their bounds? Since the EMS Conference is going to be there this year, has anyone thought that this could cause one major problem, if TABC starts to " invade " all of the EMS parties? Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail. To me TABC seems to be over stepping their bounds, especially for the ones that ever staying in the hotels where they were arrested and not going tobe driving. Sounds like a good job of the ACLU. Just my thoughts since we are going to be in Dallas this year. Wayne --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Wayne D wrote: Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail.ONLY half????? " A prudent man foresees the difficulties ahead and prepares for them; the simpleton goes blindly on and suffers the consequences. " Proverbs 22:3 --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Maybe this will stop EMS personnel from getting drunk or even drinking in public while wearing their service name plaster all over their clothing!!!!! Personnally I think this entire process by TABC is outrageous and it needs to stop. Later, EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC So how many of you out there have been watching the news about the TABC over stepping their bounds? Since the EMS Conference is going to be there this year, has anyone thought that this could cause one major problem, if TABC starts to " invade " all of the EMS parties? Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail. To me TABC seems to be over stepping their bounds, especially for the ones that ever staying in the hotels where they were arrested and not going tobe driving. Sounds like a good job of the ACLU. Just my thoughts since we are going to be in Dallas this year. Wayne --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 You know, Gene and I could retire my remaining student loans by setting up a 24 hour jail release operation at Conference.... <GRIN> -Wes EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC So how many of you out there have been watching the news about the TABC over stepping their bounds? Since the EMS Conference is going to be there this year, has anyone thought that this could cause one major problem, if TABC starts to " invade " all of the EMS parties? Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail. To me TABC seems to be over stepping their bounds, especially for the ones that ever staying in the hotels where they were arrested and not going tobe driving. Sounds like a good job of the ACLU. Just my thoughts since we are going to be in Dallas this year. Wayne --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 What, no " get out of jail FREE " cards? Kim RE: EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC > > > Maybe this will stop EMS personnel from getting drunk or even drinking in > public while wearing their service name plaster all over their > clothing!!!!! > > > Personnally I think this entire process by TABC is outrageous and it needs > to stop. > > Later, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Profit before friendship.... <EEEEVIL GRIN>. I learned that in my legal ethics course. (Yes, that course was an oxymoron.) -Wes Re: EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC What, no " get out of jail FREE " cards? Kim RE: EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC > > > Maybe this will stop EMS personnel from getting drunk or even drinking in > public while wearing their service name plaster all over their > clothing!!!!! > > > Personnally I think this entire process by TABC is outrageous and it needs > to stop. > > Later, > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 " Legal ethics " an oxymoron? Good point, but in light of this thread, try " legally drunk " as well. ;-) Kim Re: EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC > > > What, no " get out of jail FREE " cards? > > Kim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Wes, you know you probably could and have enoug to live on for a few yrs. LOL Wayne ExLngHrn@... wrote: You know, Gene and I could retire my remaining student loans by setting up a 24 hour jail release operation at Conference.... <GRIN> -Wes EMS Conference, Dallas & TABC So how many of you out there have been watching the news about the TABC over stepping their bounds? Since the EMS Conference is going to be there this year, has anyone thought that this could cause one major problem, if TABC starts to " invade " all of the EMS parties? Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail. To me TABC seems to be over stepping their bounds, especially for the ones that ever staying in the hotels where they were arrested and not going tobe driving. Sounds like a good job of the ACLU. Just my thoughts since we are going to be in Dallas this year. Wayne --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 In order to understand this you must first understand the laws applicable to it. PENAL CODE TITLE 1. INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 1.07. DEFINITIONS. (a) In this code: (40) " Public place " means any place to which the public or a substantial group of the public has access and includes, but is not limited to, streets, highways, and the common areas of schools, hospitals, apartment houses, office buildings, transport facilities, and shops. PENAL CODE TITLE 10. OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND MORALS CHAPTER 49. INTOXICATION AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE OFFENSES § 49.01. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (2) " Intoxicated " means: (A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or ( having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. § 49.02. PUBLIC INTOXICATION. (a) A person commits an offense if the person appears in a public place while intoxicated to the degree that the person may endanger the person or another. ( It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the alcohol or other substance was administered for therapeutic purposes and as a part of the person's professional medical treatment by a licensed physician. © Except as provided by Subsection (e), an offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor. § 49.04. DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED. (a) A person commits an offense if the person is intoxicated while operating a motor vehicle in a public place Members that are at “Private Club” are not in a public place and are therefore not able to be arrested under this provision. Most bars in wet areas are not going to be private clubs and are therefore going to be public places. If you are intoxicated in a public place you are breaking the law. Does this necessitate a trip to the pokey? I think not. If you’re being an arse, or otherwise endangering others or yourself, be prepared to spend a cold night in the drunk tank. Be nice to the officers and they’ll probably be nice to you. Be a jerk, and expect less than courteous treatment. Having said all of that, these arrests are legal. Has TABC overstepped it bounds? I don’t think so. Are they making an impact on DWI’s, as they allege is their motive for this roundup? Who knows? Are they being prudent with our tax dollars, I don’t think so, but the answer to this depends on the outcome of their supposed reason for their mission. If they are making an impact on drunk driving, I’d have to say so. I personally think stings looking for intoxicated persons, and then watching for them to operate a motor vehicle in a public place would be more prudent. I am completely against going into clubs, bars, restaurants, and other public places and rounding up everyone that the officers believe is intoxicated. One woman I saw on TV that was arrested in the bar of the hotel where she was staying. This was probably legal, but that doesn’t make it right or prudent on the part of the officers. Who knows, maybe she was going to take someone back to her room that she’d have regretted in the morning. In that case, maybe they did her a favor. Even so, she’s an adult and she chose to have those drinks. Why mess with her if she’s not causing trouble? Will the EMS Conference be affected? I think this sting will be over by then for whatever reason. If not, simply don’t get drunk in “publikkkk” (in my best Ron White voice, as I take a sip of my beverage). Most of the “gatherings” I have been to at conferences are in private areas, so as long as you remain there, you’re safe. Good luck and be safe, Tater Wayne D wrote: So how many of you out there have been watching the news about the TABC over stepping their bounds? Since the EMS Conference is going to be there this year, has anyone thought that this could cause one major problem, if TABC starts to " invade " all of the EMS parties? Let's just hope that they will stop before the EMS Conference, so that half of the EMS personnel in attendance of the conference want wind up in jail. To me TABC seems to be over stepping their bounds, especially for the ones that ever staying in the hotels where they were arrested and not going tobe driving. Sounds like a good job of the ACLU. Just my thoughts since we are going to be in Dallas this year. Wayne --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 I am not defending or vilifying TABC here, and my personal jury is still out on this one. However, IMHO, if a peace officer witnesses someone and has probable cause to believe them to be intoxicated, and only observes them and allows them to get behind the wheel and drive away in order to secure a DWI arrest, and the person then has a crash or injures someone, the officer bears some culpability in that crash. Just my $0.02, and again you paid too much. Randell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 I mentioned that because some departments use that type of sting to combat DWI. I agree with your argument against it, but at this point I don’t see the necessity in arresting everyone that is PI. The taxpayers would be much better served by community policing, and or code compliance that rounding up the happy drunks at every club in town. BTW, the stop is usually made before the driver gets far at all. Sometimes even in the parking lot, since those (unless part of a private club) are public places. Randell Pitts wrote: I am not defending or vilifying TABC here, and my personal jury is still out on this one. However, IMHO, if a peace officer witnesses someone and has probable cause to believe them to be intoxicated, and only observes them and allows them to get behind the wheel and drive away in order to secure a DWI arrest, and the person then has a crash or injures someone, the officer bears some culpability in that crash. Just my $0.02, and again you paid too much. Randell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.