Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 In frequent-dose-chelation , Nahla Abbo wrote: Are you saying you don't think I have Mercury toxicity? I am surprised, but you have more experience with this. -------I think you need to remember that you don't have a totally normal hair test one day and a totally deranged one the next day. There is a progression from normal to deranged, so you could be somewhat toxic before actually meeting the counting rules. Andy talks about this in the HTI book pages 25-26, and mentions tests being suspicous, unusual, etc., when they don't quite meet the counting rules. Consider yourself lucky that you may have caught this earlier than some of us.--------Jackie T. Dr. Huggins claimed it to be retention toxicity, which I interpreted it to mean due to poor mineral transport, but what do I know. --------I almost went the Huggins route also when I couldn't find a competent doctor to help me, and thank god I found these groups and had Andy's AI book. I believe that Huggins knows nothing about deranged mineral transport, and calls any hair test with low mercury " retention toxicity " . So IMO, he's guessing, and Andy has tried to quantify it and understands this on a much more scientific level and puts it in simple counting rules to help us figure this out. Thank you Andy!------Jackie T. Recent Activity a.. 8New Members Visit Your Group Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.