Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Your friend needs to learn about glycation. What it is and how it affects the body. Any bs over 120 rapidly speeds up the glycation process. Once the glucose on the red blood cell is converted to sorbitol, it can no longer transport oxygen. In effect the red blood cell is dead, and organs supplied by these red blood cells experience oxygen deprivation. This is the reason high blood sugars is the primary culprit in diabetic complications and mostly complications of any kind. Bill wants to help a sighted friend >A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been > diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care > of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that > in > all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've > tried > to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me > to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him > pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit > and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight > but > he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified > into > thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of > 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen > there. > > Thanks for any help. > > Bill Powers > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 I just read a very short blurb on this subject recently. It said that your sugar should go no higher than 180 two hours after eating and should be 90 to 130 before eating. I've even read some reports that list lower numbers than that as the ideal. So your friend is definitely diluting himself. Becky Bill wants to help a sighted friend A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that in all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've tried to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight but he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified into thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen there. Thanks for any help. Bill Powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Harry, Thanks for that answer. I had forgotten the term for it but I knew that high blood sugars would cause oxygen deprivation. I will pass that on to my friend. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Becky, Where have you even read that the numbers can go up to 180? Maybe I'm looking in the wrong places but it would seem to me that we want to get the numbers lower and keep them very close to the 120 upper limit at least. I think what my friend is wanting is some kind of validation that his illness is not as bad as it might be, and I just can't give him that. He has been gaining weight steadily for years, and I know he's over 450 and probably close to 500 pounds now. It took him a lot of years to finally admit he's fat, but sometimes I still don't think he admits to himself he's morbidly obese. He can tell me his sister is fat, but he just couldn't pin that on himself for a number of years. I always worried that he was going to become diabetic, and had hoped he was going to get really serious after a heart attack about 1-1/2 years ago. That didn't do it. Now he is so big he can't walk much, has leg edema, cellulitis in his legs, then now the diabetes diagnosis, so he is just getting worse with no energy to do much about it. Oh and we won't even get into trying to get him on SSDI and SSI now, that's been a nightmare including a doctor that won't fill out disability papers for him unless he SEES that doctor and then the doc wants to charge him extra for filling out a simple form he needs to get the money for doctor visits and just living in general anyway. There's a soapbox that raises MY blood pressure. Anyway, back to my friend, I'm hoping he will finally get serious and do something for himself, he doesn't have many options but if he doesn't do something, I can only imagine what will happen down the road. Let's keep him in our prayers that things will turn around for him. Thanks and again, Merry Christmas to all, and to all a Happy, Healthy and Prosperous New Year. Bill Powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Hi Becky, I have read Bill's response to this and I am surprised Harry has not had a stroke from these numbers.. (LOL) Bill is correct, 160 is the *very* max your blood sugar should ever be for any period of time unless you want more Diabetic complications. Just divide your blood sugar by 18 and that will be pretty close to your 1C reading.... You should keep your sugar below 120 for your 2 hour post meal readings.... Now Bill, as for your friend, I think he is is serious trouble to say the very least. Hang in there folks and please have a safe and happy Christmas celebration... Cy, the Ancient Okie... _____ From: blind-diabetics [mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Becky Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 11:02 AM To: blind-diabetics Subject: RE: Bill wants to help a sighted friend I just read a very short blurb on this subject recently. It said that your sugar should go no higher than 180 two hours after eating and should be 90 to 130 before eating. I've even read some reports that list lower numbers than that as the ideal. So your friend is definitely diluting himself. Becky Bill wants to help a sighted friend A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that in all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've tried to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight but he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified into thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen there. Thanks for any help. Bill Powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 oh my, what a project you have on your hand. I wonder if you shouldn't help him find a diabetes educator, so that he can argue with them, officials and strangers, and not you, a friend, on the subject. Merry christmas. Vicki Breffe " He that has a merry heart has a continual feast... " Proverbs 15:15 Bill wants to help a sighted friend >A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been > diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care > of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that > in > all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've > tried > to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me > to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him > pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit > and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight > but > he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified > into > thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of > 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen > there. > > Thanks for any help. > > Bill Powers > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Actually, I am trying to find him a doctor that will see him without expecting money up-front so he can get his disability claim going, and find him a nutritionist that knows current diabetes data, not somebody who read it in a textbook years ago and hasn't gone with the flow. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 24, 2006 Report Share Posted December 24, 2006 Hello Cy and Bill I use Newsline for the Blind sponsored by the NFB which allows me to read from any of over 150 newspapers via the telephone. There are several newspapers that have health sections on certain days of the week. It is interesting to me how almost every article I read on diabetes lists a different set of numbers as being acceptable. I’ve read 70 to 110, 80 to 120, and 90 to 130. I have to admit that I did think the mention of a post-meal reading of 180 sounded high, but since I just read that one this morning before reading Bill’s post about his friend, that was the one I mentioned in my reply. Bill, It sounds as if your friend is one of those people who has been in denial about the seriousness of his health problems for a long time, and I suspect he will always be in denial no matter how bad things get. I hope that with your continued encouragement, and perhaps some counseling from his doctor, that he will try to improve his health. Again, Merry Christmas to you all. Becky _____ From: blind-diabetics [mailto:blind-diabetics ] On Behalf Of Cy Selfridge Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 2:22 PM To: blind-diabetics Subject: RE: Bill wants to help a sighted friend Hi Becky, I have read Bill's response to this and I am surprised Harry has not had a stroke from these numbers.. (LOL) Bill is correct, 160 is the *very* max your blood sugar should ever be for any period of time unless you want more Diabetic complications. Just divide your blood sugar by 18 and that will be pretty close to your 1C reading.... You should keep your sugar below 120 for your 2 hour post meal readings.... Now Bill, as for your friend, I think he is is serious trouble to say the very least. Hang in there folks and please have a safe and happy Christmas celebration... Cy, the Ancient Okie... _____ From: blind-diabetics@ <mailto:blind-diabetics%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com [mailto:blind-diabetics@ <mailto:blind-diabetics%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Becky Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2006 11:02 AM To: blind-diabetics@ <mailto:blind-diabetics%40yahoogroups.com> yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: Bill wants to help a sighted friend I just read a very short blurb on this subject recently. It said that your sugar should go no higher than 180 two hours after eating and should be 90 to 130 before eating. I've even read some reports that list lower numbers than that as the ideal. So your friend is definitely diluting himself. Becky Bill wants to help a sighted friend A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that in all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've tried to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight but he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified into thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen there. Thanks for any help. Bill Powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 25, 2006 Report Share Posted December 25, 2006 Bill, I am way behind in my E-mails as I was out of town, but your friend will probably just keep on going the way he has been his whole life. Anyone who weighs that much as an eating problem and needs counseling first and foremost. Bill wants to help a sighted friend A friend of mine who is morbidly obese (almost 500 pounds) has been diagnosed with diabetes, and I'm trying to " coach " him on how to take care of himself before he gets any worse. But in his talks to me he says that in all his " reading " he has found that sugars are OK up to 200, and I've tried to tell him that no, 120 should be the limit. Can somebody please link me to, or e-mail something concrete on this so I can get the info to him pronto? In all I have seen, the new guidelines subscribe to the 120 limit and anything over is considered dangerous. I know he has a lot of weight but he needs to deal with the harsh reality of diabetes and not be pacified into thinking " it's OK if it's 200 or so. " His sister routinely runs sugars of 450-500 and doesn't even think about it, a sure fatality waiting to happen there. Thanks for any help. Bill Powers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.