&MATH Kawasaki Disease : Article by Parrillo, DO, FACOE...

[Guest guest]

Subject: Fwd: Re: [ ] Kawasaki Disease : Article by

Parrillo, DO, FACOE...

Thank you! Now you know why my math teacher told me TAKE THE fireman job

. But anytime I see a disease such as Kawasaki's that has a ratio

of illness of male to female, I got to wonder WHY? Small pox is an ERA

disease (equal rights amendment disease). It kills males and females

equally, so I wonder what is the difference in these other diseases of

" unknown cause, and no known cure " , in their effects on male to female?

It is known that males handle toxic metals much worse than females.

ltldab1@ juno.com

I misread the ratio at first myself when I was looking up Kawasaki

disease in

response to the Redbook article about Jett

Travolta/Preston...according to

the Parrillo article the ratio is 1.5 to 1...

--- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

there are other things males do worse than females too and it has nothing to do

with heavy metals. Probably if people are expected to consider views that are

not mainstream, it is important to ensure that opinions have a sound basis or

everyone with that theory is going to be dismissed as a crank who sees the

problem everywhere.

ltldab1@... wrote:

>Subject: Fwd:  Re: [ ] Kawasaki Disease : Article by

>Parrillo, DO, FACOE...

>Thank you! Now you know why my math teacher told me TAKE THE fireman job

>. But anytime I see a disease such as Kawasaki's that has a ratio

>of illness of male to female, I got to wonder WHY? Small pox is an ERA

>disease (equal rights amendment disease). It kills males and females

>equally, so I wonder what is the difference in these other diseases of

> " unknown cause, and no known cure " , in their effects on male to female?

>It is known that males handle toxic metals much worse than females.

> ltldab1@ juno.com

>

>

>I misread the ratio at first myself when I was looking up Kawasaki

>disease in

>response to the Redbook article about Jett

>Travolta/Preston...according to

>the Parrillo article the ratio is 1.5 to 1...

>--- End forwarded message ---

>

>

>=======================================================

>