Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Share Posted January 30, 2006 I think that's great for you to make that decision for yourself. You should have every right to do so. But I don't think the government should be able to mandate what anybody else does. Public service announcements, anything they want to do, but not law. Period. I don't know what they do vis a vis your stated concerns, but I bet The LaLeche League, #1 has safeguards in place, and #2 has a HUGE opinion about this issue! If I get more time later, I will go check it out. At the very least, it should be interesting to see what they say. ,L.Ac. --- wrote: > I don't think the government should become involved, > but I do think that > using other moms' milk might potentially pose a > problem. For one thing, HIV > (whether it's been proven to be the cause of AIDS or > not) is present in the > breast milk of infected mothers, as are other > pathogens, toxins, drugs, etc. > Wouldn't one have to have the milk repeatedly > tested? And as far as HIV, it > might not show up right away. I'm not sure how I > feel about this; but, I > don't think I could ever risk it. Just my .02! > > ~~ > > New kind of raw milk problem > > > > Posted with permission: > > > > --- Will Winter wrote: > >> Last night on a Zahn on CNN there was a > >> hilarious story about the government trying > >> to shut down another illegal activity: mothers > who > >> are unable to breast feed their babies > >> and who want to buy breast milk from other moms > (or > >> have other moms wet nurse their > >> babies). It's ILLEGAL! The government wants to > >> control it, pasteurize it, and regulate the > >> sale. They can't figure out why these mothers > just > >> don't use FORMULA! They had > >> " pediatricians " on the show testifying how SCARY > >> this dangerous " milk sharing " could be!!! > >> ARRRRGGGGG! > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Share Posted January 30, 2006 On this issue I'd say that it's just fine to swap mother's for breastfeeding. This is how civilizations did it since time immemorial. After all, a thousand years ago they couldn't turn to formula if one mother had breatfeeding problems. As for the concern someone mentioned with drugs and HIV. Of course, duh, you wouldn't give your child to be nursed by someone who had HIV or who was on prescription drugs, illegal drugs, or any other kind of risk. Is there some risk involved, sure, there's risk everytime you drive your car or get on a plane. Life is very risky, we have to manage our risks. I think most women's milk would be fine. _______________________ Alpenpässe Chèvres SuissesAlpine Pass Swiss Dairy Goats Naftoli, Efraim, & Ilana Pickard 45201 Carmel Valley road Greenfield, CA 93927 Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, more on new and used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Share Posted January 30, 2006 I don't think this necessitates a "duh" as you say because nowhere in my response to this issue did I presume someone would **knowingly** put their baby at risk. But we all know that it doesn't so much matter what a person tells us they do or don't do ... we can never know for sure, so I personally wouldn't risk it without 100% certainty; that's all. ~ ~ MA Re: New kind of raw milk problem <snip> As for the concern someone mentioned with drugs and HIV. Of course, duh, you wouldn't give your child to be nursed by someone who had HIV or who was on prescription drugs, illegal drugs, or any other kind of risk. Is there some risk involved, sure, there's risk everytime you drive your car or get on a plane. Life is very risky, we have to manage our risks. I think most women's milk would be fine. _______________________ Alpenpässe Chèvres SuissesAlpine Pass Swiss Dairy Goats Naftoli, Efraim, & Ilana Pickard 45201 Carmel Valley road Greenfield, CA 93927 Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2006 Report Share Posted January 30, 2006 It's been 10 years since I was the one in need of fresh breast milk for a special needs child, so my experiences may be dated, but the facts of my daughter's improved digestibility on the breast milk will never be 'dated' <G>. I had a number of friends and even some women I didn't know at all who lovingly donated breast milk to help my daughter. I can't even begin to tell you how much I appreciated their loving care. My daughter never threw up breast milk, though she had severe GERD and a rare chromosomal abnormality. She didn't have cramps from it and was content. During that time I remember the breast milk banks had been shut down, but at some point I remember someone having a preemie and being able to get insurance coverage for ordering breastmilk from a bank in Dallas, TX. I thought they had figured out how to screen the milk and had re- opened breastmilk banks for those in need. Wetnursing in my opinion is an excellent career -- The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2006 Report Share Posted February 1, 2006 christina, by your logic you should not be drinking milk from a cow, with that cow being who knows where, either. If you know the gov has been lying to you about raw milk then where did you get the belief that the AIDS stuff (and the this stuff and that stuff) is true ? why is the milk from humans inherently dangerous and the milk from cows safe? Is it that you believe a man or woman who purchases a farm is the type who's responsible but the woman who would give her milk to a baby could be just about anyone? The same system works with people as with cow shares. If you know the person and know her lifestyle (drugs, no drugs) you have a greater confidence in her than you can get from any gov agency. LAURA. > >> Last night on a Zahn on CNN there was a > >> hilarious story about the government trying > >> to shut down another illegal activity: mothers who > >> are unable to breast feed their babies > >> and who want to buy breast milk from other moms (or > >> have other moms wet nurse their > >> babies). It's ILLEGAL! The government wants to > >> control it, pasteurize it, and regulate the > >> sale. They can't figure out why these mothers just > >> don't use FORMULA! They had > >> " pediatricians " on the show testifying how SCARY > >> this dangerous " milk sharing " could be!!! > >> ARRRRGGGGG! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 Of course, so why post? This is like coming into a raw fruit forum and saying that we should be careful because apples could be rotten or have worms, you know. ~LAURA~ > > I don't think this necessitates a " duh " as you say because nowhere in my response to this issue did I presume someone would **knowingly** put their baby at risk. But we all know that it doesn't so much matter what a person tells us they do or don't do ... we can never know for sure, so I personally wouldn't risk it without 100% certainty; that's all. > > ~ ~ > MA > Re: New kind of raw milk problem > > > > <snip> > As for the concern someone mentioned with drugs and HIV. Of course, duh, you wouldn't give your child to be nursed by someone who had HIV or who was on prescription drugs, illegal drugs, or any other kind of risk. > > Is there some risk involved, sure, there's risk everytime you drive your car or get on a plane. Life is very risky, we have to manage our risks. > > I think most women's milk would be fine. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 Er, isn't human breast milk a form of raw milk? - Jerome, not wanting to make trouble, but what is raw milk if not milk that is raw, unprocessed? [snip] > ... particularly since breastmilk is not raw milk ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 I realized after I hit Send that I meant to say raw **cow's** milk, but it really doesn't matter. I'm not really interested in pursuing this. Re: Re: New kind of raw milk problem > Er, isn't human breast milk a form of raw milk? > > - Jerome, not wanting to make trouble, but what is raw milk > if not milk that is raw, unprocessed? > > > > [snip] >> ... particularly since breastmilk is not raw milk ... > > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 One point: Breast milk has no more toxins than any other mammal milk that ingests things w/ toxins. Your own breast milk could easily have toxins. Little is perfect. There have been studies, one in particular, that show that pasteurized breast milk is no better than preterm formula for premature babies, while raw donated or mothers own breast milk is superior for health. Raw is Better. kathryn russell www.MajestyFarm.com " The one the tyrants fear is the man who knows his rights and is prepared to stand up for them. " andr Solzhenitsyn Re: Re: New kind of raw milk problem I really don't understand why you appear so antagonistic on this issue! As with every other issue that comes up, I am entitled to my opinion. I simply felt that your " duh " was rude. And your analogy is weak, particularly since breastmilk is not raw milk and does carry toxins, etc. If you're proposing that breastmilk should be shared (and I'm not saying it shouldn't), it seems reasonable to consider the downside! What's the problem here?! ~~ Re: New kind of raw milk problem >> >> >> >> <snip> >> As for the concern someone mentioned with drugs and HIV. Of > course, duh, you wouldn't give your child to be nursed by someone > who had HIV or who was on prescription drugs, illegal drugs, or any > other kind of risk. >> >> Is there some risk involved, sure, there's risk everytime you > drive your car or get on a plane. Life is very risky, we have to > manage our risks. >> >> I think most women's milk would be fine. >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.