Guest guest Posted March 3, 2006 Report Share Posted March 3, 2006 Hi Sorry to be a pain, This is my opinion of course! But, in the second hand this person Ms. Kaci has had I'm sure several instance that she is aware of good , advancement and some that are worst then when they started it I'm sure is her opinion on " What she has had to deal with just like most of you know Walk the Walk, Do the Walk, See the Walk " then speak....Once again " Not All Things Work For All Autisic Children " , Each one is dealt with in its own case and in its own world. For what it " s worth to me alot is also just jumping on the band wagon and tooting thier own horn, Money talk...B.S. walks...., in some cases not, after you get your hopes up the bottom drops...Once again Its up to the Parents to Evaluate, Research, Discuss,and Review all your Options before jumping in and trying any type of new process or test, some may be more harmful than good and some may not do nothing others may just be a hear say.....The family and the parents know the child's in's and out's better than anyone else in the whole world compare, then make your choice just because something works for one does not mean it will work for everyone remember we are all different we might have some thing in common but everyone is in its own world and will have to be dealt with accordingly. Continue to try and keep on going sooner or later you will find something that does work and the improvement and advantages will be so great that it will shock everyone you know at your accomplishment.. Good Luck, I wish you well and loads of Blessings " Remember its alway for our kids " Anita Re: Dr.Kendal --don't be > frightened > > --Well, I guess Kaci is just expressing her opinion from what she > has seen. She is not claiming to be an expert. It is up to us the > parents to decide for ourselves about this doctor and his > treatments. I dont think she is saying that she thinks the doctor is > bad, but just relaying her experiences heard from other parents. > WEshould still be careful with any new treatment or doctor since > Autism is relatively puzzling and parents have been taken advantage > of that fact. So better to be careful. > > > > - In Texas-Autism-Advocacy , " Carlson " > wrote: >> >> >I don't know Dr. but this is really frightening to me for > parents and >> their children. I'm glad others have written. love to all, kat >> kat< >> >> Excuse me, but why should we give her any more credence than she > gives Dr. ? She does not have a child with neurological and > medical issues with autism, she just deals with the behavior issues, > so she said. Yes, he said that their behavior will worsen in most > cases and that is a sign that it is working, and killing the virus. > There senses most likely are waking up. Tristan was on it for > awhile and because of those behavior issues and the school's > constant griping we took him off. We intend to go back and go the > distance in the near future. Dr. does have confidence and > believes he is correct in what is " ailing " our kids with autism, > after 2 years of conferring with other qualified doctors and > treating many children with autism he now knows that the viral issue > is one component and tests confirm that many are also metal toxic. > I do not believe at all that he is a charlaton as is implyed. He > trully wants to help our kids and highly credentialled also. >> >> C. >> >> >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 HI, I CAN RECOMMEND DR. VOLPE. I FIND HIM VERY INFORMATIVE AND FOLLOWS HIS PROTOCOL FROM DAN AND WHAT OTHER THINGS YOU HAVE RESEARCHED. MY SON IS 16 YRS OLD AND CONTINUES TO IMPROVE. WE LOVE HIM AND HE IS VERY CARING TOWARDS OUR FAMILY AND HIS STAFF IS WONDERFUL ALONG WITH HIS WIFE MARGARET.. YOU CAN MENTION MY NAME IF YOU CHOOSE TO GO TO HIM.. HOPE THIS HELPS. HE ALWAYS WILL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO HELP YOU AND YOUR CHILD.. CORINNE VELA _____ From: Texas-Autism-Advocacy [mailto:Texas-Autism-Advocacy ] On Behalf Of jillramir@... Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 8:12 PM To: texas-autism-advocacy Subject: Dr. I have been trying to find posts with information about Dr. . Is he a DAN doctor? Does anyone have any contact information for him? We used a DAN doctor a year ago and I didn't feel any direction from them but would like to find a different one. We live in the Houston area. I have 3 year old triplets (only one with autism) so traveling is somewhat difficult. Can anyone recommend Dr. Volpe, Dr. Rao or Dr. or any others? Thanks, Jill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 Let me preface this by I know nothing about him or his practice. Very interesting read. I just wonder where the jump from “seeing 50-60% more patients” = “providing better care” or “the nurses ask all the questions” = “providing better care”. I think he is providing more care but I don’t see how that is necessarily better. I hope those are really well trained nurses since the history is totally dependent on them. Goes against my training and my beliefs though because history is 80% of the dx. I think I would more trust a nurse to say, “I heard noises in the lungs” then getting the subtlety’s of a history. My 3 cents. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 I’m sure he teases out more subtle things in the history when he goes in, but it sure helps get it moving along if it is at least started. I just feel like I’m wasting so much time on “other things” that could be done easily by ancillary staff. Patients must like his system in general, as I sure do not have 40 pt’s per day calling my office (even if I wanted to see that many). If his place was bad he would not be that busy. RE: re: Dr. Let me preface this by I know nothing about him or his practice. Very interesting read. I just wonder where the jump from “seeing 50-60% more patients” = “providing better care” or “the nurses ask all the questions” = “providing better care”. I think he is providing more care but I don’t see how that is necessarily better. I hope those are really well trained nurses since the history is totally dependent on them. Goes against my training and my beliefs though because history is 80% of the dx. I think I would more trust a nurse to say, “I heard noises in the lungs” then getting the subtlety’s of a history. My 3 cents. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 One of the philosophies is to do only what a doctor can do and let others do the other stuff. And it makes sense when you are trying to do high volume; that model suits a lot of doctors and also suits a lot of patients. “I’m sick, it’s not a social call, get me in and get me out.” So I think it has its niche like the extreme opposite. But like Larry, sometimes my tired brain needs a break from the Dr. stuff so working on customizing my software and wrapping up recycling is a break. And on the other hand, sometimes people just follow the crowd “well he must be good to be that busy”. Self fulfilling prophecy. Maybe he’s not good, but people keep thinking he’s good because after all, he’s really busy and “everyone” goes to him. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 RE: re: Dr. Let me preface this by I know nothing about him or his practice. Very interesting read. I just wonder where the jump from “seeing 50-60% more patients” = “providing better care” or “the nurses ask all the questions” = “providing better care”. I think he is providing more care but I don’t see how that is necessarily better. I hope those are really well trained nurses since the history is totally dependent on them. Goes against my training and my beliefs though because history is 80% of the dx. I think I would more trust a nurse to say, “I heard noises in the lungs” then getting the subtlety’s of a history. My 3 cents. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 True, and perhaps it has something to with the fact that I personally identify more with the “I’m sick, it’s not a social call, get me in and get me out” mentality. I personally do not want to go chat with my doctor for a long marathon-like visit, just get me in & out & I’m happy. I’m not so much into the slow & methodical visits, but rather I like to keep moving. We all probably mirror our personal styles & personalities onto the type of practice & patient visits we want. If you are more of a sit down, hold their hand, touchy-feely doc, then you will of course shun any “churn & earn” practice. I’m more of a high energy keep moving styled doc. RE: re: Dr. Let me preface this by I know nothing about him or his practice. Very interesting read. I just wonder where the jump from “seeing 50-60% more patients” = “providing better care” or “the nurses ask all the questions” = “providing better care”. I think he is providing more care but I don’t see how that is necessarily better. I hope those are really well trained nurses since the history is totally dependent on them. Goes against my training and my beliefs though because history is 80% of the dx. I think I would more trust a nurse to say, “I heard noises in the lungs” then getting the subtlety’s of a history. My 3 cents. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 I missed the original source that references Dr. . Could someone repeat/resend it? Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows.Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 Book: “Liberating the Family Physician” by , MD. He is a family physician in Newport News, VA. Re: FW: re: Dr. I missed the original source that references Dr. . Could someone repeat/resend it? Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 , He is a very nice guy. He has also been in the area for 20+ years. He also benefits from marketing and referrals through the hospital system. And yes, you could easily have 40 patients a day if you were in the same area for 20 years. If I had not closed to new patients (intermittently over the past 3 years), I would likely be seeing 25-30 a day now. Remember also that he went from a “traditional office” where he was already seeing 30 or so to the new vision, where he ramped things up. Finally, from someone who used to churn and burn with the best of them, we need to remember the doctor is not the one with the illness. Even if you can comfortably see 40 patients a day (juggling multiple things at the same time), that does not mean that the patients are getting what they need. Hiring others to do this extra work seems like a great solution, but that does not strengthen the dr-patient relationship, it strains it. Yes, 75% of patients will do fine with the churn and burn medical care (isn’t that why the Wal Mart and Urgent Care Clinics have so much appeal??), but when does a patient become part of the other 25%? And when they do fall into this category, will a doctor who has spent an hour with them in 2 minute increments be able to pick up on it? That is what scares me about his model (which is incidentally what most of the hospital systems see as the future); the loss of the relationship with patient. Without the relationship, are we better than midlevels? Heck, are we better than a computer program? And if we can’t prove we are, are we worth even $100,000/year? I remember a few years back, in a former practice, I was told that the organization would take care of everything and all I had to do was see patients. I was being paid to be a doctor. I did not need to worry about insurance (health for me and my family, malpractice, or billing). I even did not need to worry about my patients being covered for visits or prescriptions. Even in this ideal setting, I only had to see 15-20 patients a day. Yet I was miserable. Why? I was in the Air Force and we had banks of patients with poor continuity, poor support, and horrible records. I felt disconnected with my community and with my patients and I felt the care given was marginal at times. My point is that good docs in difficult situations can lead to bad outcomes. The only way to prevent this is a strong relationship with those that we see, which I believe is impossible when you are seeing people in 5 minutes or less. RE: re: Dr. Let me preface this by I know nothing about him or his practice. Very interesting read. I just wonder where the jump from “seeing 50-60% more patients” = “providing better care” or “the nurses ask all the questions” = “providing better care”. I think he is providing more care but I don’t see how that is necessarily better. I hope those are really well trained nurses since the history is totally dependent on them. Goes against my training and my beliefs though because history is 80% of the dx. I think I would more trust a nurse to say, “I heard noises in the lungs” then getting the subtlety’s of a history. My 3 cents. Kathy Saradarian, MD Branchville, NJ Solo low-staff practice since 4/03 In practice since 9/90 Practice Partner User since 5/03 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 17, 2007 Report Share Posted May 17, 2007 When I was starting out in practice in Canada, an older Asian pediatrician gave me the following advice;1) Clump all your appointments together so that your waiting room looks full and the patients will get the impression you are busy and popular doctor.2) Frame and hang up every certificate, publications and awards in the waiting room so you can impress the patients3) If you need to check on a drug or look up some information, tell the patient you will see if you have any samples, don't tell them you need to look something up.This man made in the top 10 percentile for pediatricians and had a very busy practice, mostly consisting of Asian patients (culturally I feel they do expect a bit more show).I have only tried out his third advice and it does work nicely.Theresa Sick sense of humor? Visit Yahoo! TV's Comedy with an Edge to see what's on, when. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.