One or Eleven?

[Guest guest]

One or eleven

The Royal Free doctors found eleven out

of twelve patients with gut problems. This team of doctors included

the much maligned Dr Wakefield.

How were the eleven found to have gut

problems? This was by a double blinded analysis of slides using

controls. Three doctors at least were privy to and agreed the

results.

What was the origin of one only with

gut problems. By a journalist with no medical qualifications but a

world famous penchant for being agressive, miserable and contrary.

Who are we to believe? The GMC, The

part owned by Merck magazine once with world class fame as the

leading journal on medicine or the source of the information; one

Deer.

Or should we believe the parents of the

children with gut problems who observed them daily for years, or the

local doctor who treated them and failed and then referred them to

the local hospital who then failed to correct the gut issues and who

then passed them on to the world renowned hospital for gut issues –

the Royal Free Hospital.

The hopsital that cured all but one

possibly of their serious gut issues so as reported they did on

one analysis no longer have this illness.

Its a close call and to date the world

is lining up behind Deer. But a chink of light came forward

when Professor - had his ejection from the medical

community soundly, roundly and profoundly reversed by someone who

wasnt fooled by arrogance, ignorance or wanting to be part of a

lynching.

The GMC has again, GOT IT WRONG. As it

always does when taking on doctors who stand by PRINCIPLES and not

the STATUS QUO of dishing out drugs and vaccines for every

consultation. The GMC needs to fight doctors who are dangerous,

incompetent or crooks and not those who have INDEPENDENT ideas.

But Brain has a right to INVESTIGATIVE

journalism and by fair means or foul got hold of a document with some

ones or twos written on it. What does this mean? For and his

medical prowess it means only ONE of the dozen actually had gut

problems. All those parents, local GP's, local hospital interns and

national experts on gut disease were ALL mistaken. With one exception

the children were FAKING IT. Holy er, er, MACKEREL. I've just ahd an

idea!

Why doesn't the English medical system

get rid of all the local doctors, hospital interns and national

expertise and replace them with one person who really knows GUT

issues. Think of the savings, not to mention all the wasted time and

appointments for people FAKING their illnesses.

I mean Brain has already got two quacks

out of the practice, oops one now but let's not reopen whether or not

is the world expert on gut illness. I think everyone already

knows.

But Brain has a point. There is a

tenfold discepancy between world expert doctors and world expert

investigative reporter number one on whether these children were

FAKING it or were ill.

Lets look at AUTISM numbers. Have they

gone up 20 fold in 20 years or as many experts claim; they have NOT

altered. It appears HUGE differences in diagnosis do occur and are

viciously argued about. But people are not being demissioned simply

because they think autism has increased 20 fold or stayed the same.

has ALL the right in the world to

dispute whatever he wants but to viciously seek out and destroy the

living of possibly three, then reduced to two and now reduced to one

doctor is BEYOND his calling as a reporter or even INVESTIGATIVE

reporter.

He himself points out that the findings

on gut issues was already in the public knowledge. One one side

trying to explain the fraud while on another admitting the research

copies and amplifies what is already known.

Merck are already proven to seek out

and destroy doctors who query their products and hence profits. Merck

are involved with the BMJ. Have they been party to the SEARCH and

DESTROY tactic used against Wakefield. Even as recently as

last year a series of articles attacking Wakefield have

appeared in their journal the BMJ. Merck do make MMR vaccines and can

be seen to have a versted interest in DESTROYING Wakefield.

I find it incredible how an

INVESTIGATIVE reporter can condemn one man for failings but then use

EXACTLY these failings to pursue his QUARRY.

One or eleven