[CoMeD] Drft reply to: Why do media report 'the other side' of scientific fact

[Guest guest]

Dear Haddayr Copley-Woods,

Attached is my formal response to your " Why do media

report 'the other side' of scientific fact " editorial,

which was downloaded on Wednesday, 9 December 2009

from:

http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/12/08/copley/

So that others may read this response, a copy is

also being posted on the CoMeD website:

http://www.Mercruy-freeDrugs.org/

and it should be available by the 6 Jan 2010 at

the latest.

Hopefully, after reading this response and checking

the facts, you will, at a minimum, have a better

understanding of the empirically proven or probable

links between “vaccines”, or some component thereof

(e.g., Thimerosal, polymeric hydroxyaluminum species,

adventitious viruses, egg albumin and cellular DNA

fragments), and the numerous chronic childhood diseases

that are at epidemic levels (> 3 in 1,000) today but

were at levels below ( < ) 1 in 10,000 before 1975.

Respectfully,

G. King, PhD

http://www.dr-king.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++