Guest guest Posted June 14, 2006 Report Share Posted June 14, 2006 I know you were trying to make a point, but I counted 253 lines after this 24 line post. Everything that had to be said was in the post, it even said " You can check it all out in the archives " . It's really hard for me, and probably everybody else that gets the daily digest, to wade theu all this dross. I've seen posts that have 3 or 4 of the little " do you Yahoo? " song-and-dance appendages (along with 10 blank lines for each) in one post. Come on, people, can we do a little judicious editing? We CAN look it up in the archives...let's just quote the RELEVANT parts of other posts we are commenting on. (Sorry if I'm so grouchy. It's just the cancer talking.) on 6/13/06 11:16 PM, ProstateCancerSupport at ProstateCancerSupport wrote: 1a. Re: To wait or not to wait at under 65 yrs old. Posted by: " sam mcdaniel " smcdaniel2@... smcdaniel2 Date: Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:57 pm (PDT) > When people do not know posting courtesy and post on top of a thread with > remarks that have nothing to do with the thread, the thread becomes twisted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.