Re: Coiling vs. pathogens CAFL - (and all)

[Guest guest]

Hello ,

Sounds very sound.

Can you tell me which freq. you use for Lyme and coinfections, or where I can

find them on the internet?

Thanks

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi ,

> > >  

> > > I would like to respond to your message which contained the following

quote, in regard to coiling being a never ending cycle:

> > >  

> > > " Because, when one thinks of it, killing each and every pathogen

(Borrelia, and the often present multiple coinfections) in every corner, mussle,

joint, bone, intestine, organ, gland   etc etc of the body seems to be

impossible. And therefore the pathogen will always start duplicating again and

the disease will return in due time. Meaning that you will have to keep coiling

for the rest of your life, which might be a good thing to do anyway. But when

fast dupplicating pahtogens are involved it can become almost the same as for

example kidney dialysis, you will always have to be near the Doug Coil the rest

of your life. Take it with you on holliday, which is quite impossible when you

want to fly to foreign country. Also you might experience herxes the rest of

your life on weakly basis or even more often, depend on how often you have to

Coil. "

> > >  

> > > The theory behind rife is to get an edge on the pathogens, diminish their

numbers, and then eliminate them. This can be done with the coinfections, but

possibly not with Borrelia. With Bb, there may always be a dormant cyst or two

in the body, not reached by rife, which could emerge at any time, become active

and reproduce at any point after remission. So yes, it's a good idea to coil

occasionally for the rest of one's life for Bb, as Doug MacLean has recommended

(I believe).

> > >  

> > > The coinfections can, and must, be elminated. Regular coiling for Bb must

be the protocol for awhile, possibly years, depending upon the individual and

the severity of infection. But after that is done, one can take long breaks, as

I understand it, and get away from home and the coil machine for extended

periods. Just how long a break to take between coiling sessions is questionable.

But if one has achieved remission for a period of time, where the coinfections

have been eliminated, and one is only coiling just once a month for Bb, perhaps

one can try not coiling for a few months, etc. Bb cysts could become active or

not - I think it's an individual case.

> > >  

> > > As for defeating the pathogens with the coil - consistent coiling, over

time, over the entire body, is the only way to do this. Reducing the pathogen

load, bit by bit, until one gets ahead of the reproduction cycle, is the way to

do it. It's different for each pathogen, and that's why coiling strategy for

each is critical. For Borrelia, I think once a week is effective. For

Bartonella, twice a day appears to be necessary. Otherwise, one cannot get ahead

of the reproductive cycle for Bart, and then coiling will become an endless

cycle. Once one gets an edge, Bart can be eliminated.

> > >  

> > > Why you are using 842 Hz., when the effective Bart frequency has been

shown to be 832 Hz., I'm not sure. I do not have Bart, but I have never heard of

anyone using 842 Hz. for that infection. Do you know of anyone who's used that

frequency for Bart with success? Many people have used 832 Hz. with success,

including S.

> > >  

> > > Please do not lose heart. If you coil consistently, you will prevail over

the pathogens. It is a long, hard road, there's no doubt about it. But you will

need to coil less and less, as time goes on, if you coil alot at first.

Then, after you have rifed down the pathogens, you can travel all you like.

> > >  

> > > Best,

> > > Jane

> > >  

> > >  

> > >

> > >

> > >  

> > >

> >

>