Where o where has the mercury gone...

[Guest guest]

Mercury is not stored in the fat cells.

Andy

> Barb,

>

> Is this true? If it is then I can fatten my kid up, which would

give him somewhere to store it and deal with the stuff at a slower

pace as he gradually lost weight???? I didn't manage to open this

attachment so maybe it confirms what you say already.

>

> Jon.

>

>

> ---- Original Message -----

> From: Barb Romkema

> @y...

> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 5:47 PM

> Subject: Re: [ ] Re: OT - Eye Symptoms (Andy,

McCandless, Bassett, Berni...

>

>

> Remember, you don't look for the mercury level in the hair, you

look for the " scatter pattern " that shows impaired minerals transport

in the hair. That is the sign of mercury toxicity. Kids will only

have it in their hair if exposure has been fairly recent. So many many

of us have had low levels in hair and much more mercury coming out.

It's stored in the fat cells.

> Barb

> Re: [ ] Re: OT - Eye Symptoms (Andy,

McCandless, Bassett, Berni...

>

>

> In a message dated 4/13/01 5:49:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

kc62765@a...

> writes:

>

>

>

> You know mercury can be zip and later come out.

>

>

> How many of you have low mercury readings on the hair test, and

then later

> get high levels come out with chelation?

>

> Margaret

>

> =======================================================

>

[Guest guest]

Andy,

I am confused. I thought that the reason mercury takes so long to come

out was because it IS stored in the fat cells in the body. Could you

clarify this?? Thanks again,

________________________________________________________________

GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!

Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!

Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:

http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

[Guest guest]

I just noticed this post from way back.

Where is mercury stored. ??? I thought it was fat cells. I think it is kinda strange that we didn't have any show up when I tested. I have this feeling it means it is hiding, but hiding where?????

This is probably strange , but I think the fact that we didn't have any actually see any means that there is some . People who are not really all that toxic would excrete some . wouldn't they. We all have accumulations over the years , even the healthy folks. I think they would excrete a little bit of everything like, some lead , some mercury etc. People that are more toxic might not show any unless provocation removed the other metals first like the lead , we saw. I am probably not making all that much sense cause maybe there is some kind of pattern like lead comes first, then whatever , then mercury. Does this make sense to anyone.??? Just wondering .... Is it possible that this NO SHOW at first is indicative of stored Mercury.... More so than someone who has it show up right away???

kelly

[Guest guest]

,

We had tested 2 times 1 for Hair and one time after 1 dose of

DMSA.... Mercury Levels were Not able to be detected at that time. At

the beginning of this month we did 3 days of DMSA and low and behold, the

Mercury levels are Moderate...which means, that YES he is storing the

Mercury somewhere in his body.

I have read that Mercury is often times the last thing to come out when

doing chelation because (depending on when the exposure was) the longer

you wait, the " more setttled into the tissues the Mercury is. I've read

several case studies from Lynn Redwood that show the same results that

got..... No Mercury to begin with. This is why hair analysis is a

waste of time if the exposure wasn't fairly recent..

Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test results?

Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the test

results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with Mercury

Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my son. I am

SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with Chelation, my

son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!!

I'm going to start round 2 today...

Best wishes!

Leigh

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:32:45 EDT kc62765@... writes:

> I just noticed this post from way back.

>

> Where is mercury stored. ??? I thought it was fat cells. I

> think it is

> kinda strange that we didn't have any show up when I tested. I

> have this

> feeling it means it is hiding, but hiding where?????

>

> This is probably strange , but I think the fact that we didn't have

> any

> actually see any means that there is some . People who are not

> really all

> that toxic would excrete some . wouldn't they. We all have

> accumulations

> over the years , even the healthy folks. I think they would

> excrete a

> little bit of everything like, some lead , some mercury etc.

> People that

> are more toxic might not show any unless provocation removed the

> other metals

> first like the lead , we saw. I am probably not making all that

> much sense

> cause maybe there is some kind of pattern like lead comes first,

> then

> whatever , then mercury. Does this make sense to anyone.??? Just

>

> wondering .... Is it possible that this NO SHOW at first is

> indicative of

> stored Mercury.... More so than someone who has it show up right

> away???

> kelly

________________________________________________________________

GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!

Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!

Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:

http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

[Guest guest]

Hey

Yes I have Andys book . I will check. I did the counting rules and was sure they applied to my son. There were very many highs and lows. I think it is stored somewhere, like I said , I know we had lead coming out. I just was wndering isn't it strange that we had even less after chelation than before. The levels were from urine testing . did you have any problems when the mercury started coming as opposed to the other metals??

you know like more side effects or anything?

kelly

Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test results? Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the test

results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with Mercury

Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my son. I am

SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with Chelation, my

son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!!

I'm going to start round 2 today...

Best wishes!

Leigh

[Guest guest]

Yes I think that it is strange to have less coming out after Mercury.....

It could be that your child's Mercury is bound tighter in the tissues

and it could take alot of time to get it all out? I'm not an expert, so

I'm not sure.

About problems... the only problem that I have seen so far is Josh gets a

rash sometimes... Other than that, he seems to do so much better when

he's on the DMSA as far as seeming " more aware " of his environment.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:28:18 EDT kc62765@... writes:

> Hey

>

> Yes I have Andys book . I will check. I did the counting rules

> and was

> sure they applied to my son. There were very many highs and lows.

> I think

> it is stored somewhere, like I said , I know we had lead coming

> out. I

> just was wndering isn't it strange that we had even less after

> chelation than

> before. The levels were from urine testing . did you have

> any

> problems when the mercury started coming as opposed to the other

> metals??

> you know like more side effects or anything?

>

> kelly

>

>

>

> > Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test

> results?

> > Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the test

> > results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with

> Mercury

> > Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my son.

> I am

> > SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with

> Chelation, my

> > son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!!

> >

> > I'm going to start round 2 today...

> >

> > Best wishes!

> >

> > Leigh

>

>

________________________________________________________________

GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!

Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!

Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:

http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

[Guest guest]

I'm sure the counting rules would be in the book. I tried to access

just now and I couldn't get in... If you want I can e-mail you the

counting rules later.

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:08:48 -0500 " Neena Garza " <ngarza@...>

writes:

> Are the counting rules in Andy's Book? I cannot get into the

> archives. If they are not in the book, is there anyway you could

> e-mail them to me.

>

> Thanks,

> Neena Garza

> ngarza@...

>

> Re: [ ] Where o where has the mercury gone...

>

>

> Hey

>

> Yes I have Andys book . I will check. I did the counting rules

> and was

> sure they applied to my son. There were very many highs and lows.

> I think

> it is stored somewhere, like I said , I know we had lead coming

> out. I

> just was wndering isn't it strange that we had even less after

> chelation than

> before. The levels were from urine testing . did you have

> any

> problems when the mercury started coming as opposed to the other

> metals??

> you know like more side effects or anything?

>

> kelly

>

>

>

>

> Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test

> results?

> Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the

> test

> results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with

> Mercury

> Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my

> son. I am

> SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with

> Chelation, my

> son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!!

>

> I'm going to start round 2 today...

>

> Best wishes!

>

> Leigh

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Are the counting rules in Andy's Book? I cannot get into the archives. If they are not in the book, is there anyway you could e-mail them to me.

Thanks,

Neena Garza

ngarza@...

Re: [ ] Where o where has the mercury gone...Hey Yes I have Andys book . I will check. I did the counting rules and was sure they applied to my son. There were very many highs and lows. I think it is stored somewhere, like I said , I know we had lead coming out. I just was wndering isn't it strange that we had even less after chelation than before. The levels were from urine testing . did you have any problems when the mercury started coming as opposed to the other metals?? you know like more side effects or anything? kelly

Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test results? Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the test results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with Mercury Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my son. I am SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with Chelation, my son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!! I'm going to start round 2 today... Best wishes! Leigh=======================================================

[Guest guest]

I would qppreciate you sending them when you get a chance.

Neena

ngarza@...

Re: [ ] Where o where has the mercury gone...

>>

>>

>> Hey

>>

>> Yes I have Andys book . I will check. I did the counting rules

>> and was

>> sure they applied to my son. There were very many highs and lows.

>> I think

>> it is stored somewhere, like I said , I know we had lead coming

>> out. I

>> just was wndering isn't it strange that we had even less after

>> chelation than

>> before. The levels were from urine testing . did you have

>> any

>> problems when the mercury started coming as opposed to the other

>> metals??

>> you know like more side effects or anything?

>>

>> kelly

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Have you read Andy's counting rules on interpreting the test

>> results?

>> Before I knew about the counting rules, I would look at the

>> test

>> results and say to myself, this does not look like a child with

>> Mercury

>> Poisoning, but the counting rules held true in the case of my

>> son. I am

>> SO EXCITED about the 3rd test result. It means that with

>> Chelation, my

>> son has the opportunity to IMPROVE!!!

>>

>> I'm going to start round 2 today...

>>

>> Best wishes!

>>

>> Leigh

>>

>>

>>

>>