Vaccines and the disabled: Great article by Dr. Blaylock, MD

[Guest guest]

Great article by Dr. Blaylock, MD

> http://www.thenhf.com/vaccinations/vac_299.htm

>

> Forced Vaccinations, Government, and the Public Interest

>

> By Dr. Blaylock, M.D.

> December 2009

>

> Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous trend in the United

> States, as well as worldwide, and that is the resorting of various

> governments at different levels to mandating forced vaccination upon the

> public at large. My State of Mississippi has one of the most-restrictive

> vaccine-exemption laws in the United States, where exemptions are allowed

> only upon medical recommendation. Ironically, this is only on paper, as

> many have had as many as three physicians, some experts in neurological

> damage caused by vaccines, provide written calls for exemption, only to be

> turned down by the State's public-health officer.

>

> Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and land,

> where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts, the

> state legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of such policies

> strongly resemble those policies found in National Socialist empires,

> Stalinist countries, or Communist China.

>

> When public-health officers are asked for the legal justification for such

> draconian measures as forcing people to accept vaccines that they deem

> either a clear and present danger to themselves and their loved ones or

> have had personal experience with serious adverse reactions to such

> vaccines, they usually resort to the need to protect the public.

>

> One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are as effective as being

> touted by the public-health officials, then why should one fear the

> unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated would have at least 95% protection.

> This question puts them in a very difficult position. Their usual response

> is that a " small " percentage of the vaccinated will not have sufficient

> protection and would still be at risk. Now, if they admit what the

> literature shows, that vaccine failure rates are much higher than the 5%

> they claim, they must face the next obvious question - then why should

> anyone take the vaccine if there is a significant chance it will not

> protect?

>

> When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification,

> the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents - herd immunity. This concept is

> based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say 100%) of the population

> must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic. The percentages needing

> vaccination grows progressively. I pondered this question for some time

> before the answer hit me. Herd immunity is mostly a myth and applies only

> to natural immunity - that is, contracting the infection itself.

>

> Is Herd Immunity Real?

>

> In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the

> population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections

> naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts

> for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept

> and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major

> problem - vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short

> period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral

> immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most

> vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox,

> measles, mumps, and rubella.

>

> Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting

> for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that

> youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they

> insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being

> suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or

> medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be

> done.

>

> That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite

> simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that all of the

> childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking existed for over 70

> years. It was not until relatively recently that it was discovered that

> most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being

> given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the

> baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these

> diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In

> essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for

> decades.

>

> If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent

> massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have

> all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population

> having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this

> country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred.

> Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors,

> public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into

> accepting vaccinations.

>

> When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the

> vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the

> public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that

> with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that

> most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being

> vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd

> immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95%

> effectiveness rates.

>

> Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would

> not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually give the

> physicians who question my statement that herd immunity is a myth a simple

> example. When I was a medical student almost 40 years ago, it was taught

> that the tetanus vaccine would last a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had

> been mandated, we discovered that its protection lasted no more than 10

> years. Then, I ask my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case

> of tetanus? Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on

> tetanus infections - one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The same can be

> said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections. It was, and still

> is, all a myth.

>

> The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest upon this myth and it is

> important that we demonstrate the falsity of this idea. Neil Z. , in

> his latest book The Vaccine Information Manual, provides compelling

> evidence that herd immunity is a myth.

>

> The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions

>

> Those pushing mandatory vaccination for an ever-growing list of diseases

> are a mixed bag. Some are quite sincere and truly want to improve the

> health of the United States. They believe the vaccine-induced herd

> immunity myth and likewise believe that vaccines are basically effective

> and safe. These are not the evil people.

>

> A growing number are made of those with a collectivist worldview and see

> themselves as a core of elite wise men and women who should tell the rest

> of us what we should do in all aspects of our lives. They see us as

> ignorant cattle, who are unable to understand the virtues of their plan

> for America and the World. Like children, we must be made to take our

> medicine - since, in their view, we have no concept of the true benefit of

> the bad-tasting medicine we are to be fed.

>

> I have also found that a small number of people in the regulatory agencies

> and public health departments would like to speak out but are so

> intimidated and threatened with dismissal or destruction of their careers,

> that they remain silent. As for the media, they are absolutely clueless.

>

> I have found that " reporters " (we have few real journalists these days)

> rarely understand what they are reporting on and always trust and rely

> upon people in positions of official power, even if those people are

> unqualified to speak on the subject. Most of the time they run to the

> Centers for Disease Control or medical university to seek answers. I

> cannot count the number of times I have seen university department heads

> interviewed when it was obvious they had no clue as to the subject being

> discussed. Few such professors will pass up an opportunity to appear on

> camera or be quoted in a newspaper.

>

> One must also appreciate that such reporters and editors are under an

> enormous economic strain, as vaccine manufacturers are major advertisers

> in all media outlets and for an obvious reason - it controls content. A

> number of excellent stories on such medical subjects are spiked every day.

> That means we will always be relegated to the " fringe media " as our media

> outlets are called. Despite the high quality of the journalism in many of

> the " fringe " outlets, they have a much smaller audience. And despite this

> we are having an enormous effect on the debate.

>

> As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate

>

> Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning, observed that as the British

> collectivists began to see opposition rise to their grandiose plans, they

> became more desperate and aggressive in their reaction. They then

> initiated a campaign of smearing their opponents and blaming every failure

> on the unwillingness of the people to accept the planner's dictates

> without question. We certainly have seen this in this debate -opponents to

> forced vaccinations are referred to as fringe scientists, kooks,

> uneducated, confused, and enemies of public safety - reminiscent of

> Stalin's favorite phrase, " enemy of the people. "

>

> This desperation is based upon their fear that the public might soon catch

> on to the fact that the entire vaccine program is based upon nonsense,

> fear, and concocted fairy tales. One special fear of theirs is that the

> public might discover the fact that most vaccines are contaminated with a

> number of known and yet-to-be discovered viruses, bacteria, viral

> fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments. And, further, that our science

> demonstrates that these contaminants could lead to a number of

> slowly-developing degenerative diseases, including degenerative diseases

> of the brain. This is rarely discussed but is of major importance in this

> debate.

>

> The idea that adults and their children would be forced to submit to being

> injected with dozens of these organisms and organic fragments is

> terrifying. No regulatory agency is tracking to see if chronic diseases

> are rising in the vaccinated, yet we have compelling evidence of a massive

> rise in all autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and certain

> cancers since the advent of a dramatic increase in the number of vaccines

> being mandated.

>

> Of special concern is the finding that many of the contaminant organisms

> can pass from generation to generation. For example, new studies have

> found that SV-40, a major contaminant of the polio vaccine until 1963, not

> only existed as a latent virus for the lifetime of those exposed to the

> vaccine but was being passed on to the next generation, primarily by way

> of sperm, something called vertical transmission. This means that every

> generation from now on will be infected with this known carcinogenic

> virus. There is also compelling evidence that some polio vaccines

> manufactured after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus.

>

> What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of such concern is its

> association with so many cancers - including mesothelioma,

> medulloblastoma, ependymoma, meningioma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma,

> pituitary adenoma, glioblastoma, osteosarcomas, non-Hodgkins lymphoma,

> papillary thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.

>

> The Federal government has gone to enormous lengths to cover up this

> association, despite the powerful scientific evidence that this vaccine

> infected at least a hundred million people worldwide with this

> carcinogenic virus. And, it took over 40 years just to get this far.

> Linking vaccine contaminations and immunoexcitotoxicity to the drastic

> rise in neurodegenerative diseases will probably take even longer because

> of the widespread growth of entrenched powers high in government and their

> control of the media, which is equally extensive. The fact that powerful,

> enormously wealthy foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, Bill and

> Melinda Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller series of foundations, are

> supporting forced vaccination greatly enhances the power of governments

> all over the World.

>

> These foundations operate in the shadows, influencing legislation and

> government actions through the World Health Organization and individual

> governmental bodies. Behind every call for forced vaccinations, mandated

> quarantines, and home invasions, one can find one of these foundations

> providing the money as well as experts. Remember, the largest of the

> pharmaceutical-vaccine manufacturers are also providing much of the money

> for the foundations and serving on the boards of these foundations. The

> Rockefellers either owned outright or had controlling interest in all of

> the major pharmaceutical companies. This has given them absolute and

> extremely powerful access to the reins of power at all levels. Yet, they

> can be defeated by the truth.

>

> Dr. Blaylock is a board-certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer. He

> attended the LSU School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana and

> completed his internship and neurosurgical residency at the Medical

> University of South Carolina in ton, South Carolina. For the past

> 24 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition to having a nutritional

> practice for 2 years. Retiring from his neurosurgical practice to devote

> full time to nutritional studies and research, Dr. Blaylock has written

> and illustrated three books (Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health

> and Nutrition Secrets That Can Save Your Life, and Natural Strategies for

> The Cancer Patient). In addition, he has written and illustrated three

> chapters in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection

> against biological terrorism, has an e-booklet on radioprotection (Nuclear

> Sunrise), written and illustrated a booklet on multiple sclerosis, and

> written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals.

>

> Other credits include Dr. Blaylock's DVD Nutrition & Behavior, a CD-ROM on

> the Truth About Aspartame, and, for the past five years, a health

> newsletter The Blaylock Wellness Report, published by NewsMax. Since the

> publication of his first book, he has been a guest on over 100 syndicated

> radio and television programs and appeared on the 700 Club seven times. He

> lectures widely to both lay and professional medical audiences on a

> variety of nutritional subjects.

>

> Dr. Blaylock is a visiting professor of biology at Belhaven College and

> serves on the editorial staff of the Journal of the American Nutraceutical

> Association, the editorial staff of the Fluoride Journal and is on the

> editorial staff of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons,

> official journal of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.

> He is also a regular lecturer for the Fellowship for Anti-aging and

> Regenerative Medicine.

>

>

>

> VIC (Vaccine Information Coalition)

> Autism is 1 in 67 children today and it's impossible to have a genetic

> epidemic!

> Please learn from our mistake and educate BEFORE you vaccinate!

> For more information visit www.vacinfo.org or call

>

>