Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Kitty: > While I don't believe in the " higher power " sort of God, I believe strongly in willpower and self-control. Why must one deciding to not take drugs, etc, be ascribed to a God? What about personal choice? I don't understand when Christians say " I did so-and-so because I'm Christian. " Why not, " I did so-and-so because I felt it was *right*? " The " Christian " line makes it sound like they are performing by rote, rather than from their hearts or minds. Isn't there strength in finding a moral center, doing good deeds, etc, *without* chalking it all up to a God? My experience is that when we do things because we think we " ought to " that usually don't have the same quality and positive effect as when done from the heart because one truly wants to. I also don't believe abstinence necessarily has to do with either God nor will-power in every case; sometimes one just grows out of certain patterns of behavior when one is finished with them. In such cases there is little risk of relapse since one has simply lost interest. Then temptation is not a problem; what once may have felt like an irresistible urge or attraction will only leave one indifferent or even turn one off. I think it is those who have not yet fully grown out of their own urges/addictions etc. who feel a need to fight them in others; what they are really doing is fighting them in themselves. Inger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 The essence of all spirituality is to not take things for granted. One corollary is to always be grateful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 The essence of all spirituality is to not take things for granted. One corollary is to always be grateful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Sometimes people who realize urges lead people astray wish to teach others the same principle out of the goodness of their hearts though. Tom Administrator I think it is those who have not yet fully grown out of their own urges/addictions etc. who feel a need to fight them in others; what they are really doing is fighting them in themselves. Inger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 --- Lissa <catgrrl522@...> wrote: > While I don't believe in the " higher power " sort of > God, I believe > strongly in willpower and self-control. Why must one > deciding to not > take drugs, etc, be ascribed to a God? What about > personal choice? I > don't understand when Christians say " I did > so-and-so because I'm > Christian. " Why not, " I did so-and-so because I felt > it was *right*? " I wrote on the list a few days ago that I have always been a " straight arrow " . My parents were alcoholics, and my brothers turned to drugs. I decided by the time I was 12 that I wanted to do neither drugs or alcohol. It seemed foolish and destructive to me so I never did. Never started smoking, either, for the same reasons. I became a Christian when I was 19 because I felt God was seeking me out. I always believed He was there, but never felt I could make a " connection " with Him until I was 19 [and I did try for several years and then just gave up]. It seemed for whatever reason when I stopped looking for Him, He came looking for me. I was quite surprised. I spoke of feeling alone before then. Since becoming a Christian I have never felt that alone again. One might say that I am just playing mind games with myelf, but I do know what it is like to live in my own head and create worlds there to cope or just entertain myself, as I have a high ability to fantasize. What I have now with God is not the same as when I fantasize. There is a vast difference. If I thought my relationship with God was merely in my own imagination, I wouldn't bother. > The " Christian " line makes it sound like they are > performing by rote, > rather than from their hearts or minds. Isn't there > strength in > finding a moral center, doing good deeds, etc, > *without* chalking it > all up to a God? I know what you mean here, but that is not the case with myself. I didn't need God to rescue me from a life of drugs or alchohol. I always did the right thing because it was the right thing to do and I get immense satisfaction from doing the right thing, and I always felt badly doing the wrong thing. When I became a Christian at 19 my mother was puzzled as to why I did. " Why do *you* need to be 'born again'? " she asked. " You have always done the right things. " Of my older brother, who became a Christian the same year I did, she said, " I can see your brother needing it. With all the drugs, drinking and stealing he has done, HE really needs it! " I told Mom that it was not a matter of being rescued from bad behavior, but relationship. I love God. I like talking to Him, I feel Him with me. She didn't get that and many people still don't. Take care, Gail :-) __________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Yes, sometimes. But I've not seen much goodness from the heart coming from conservative faction on this forum on THIS particular issue, only harsh judgementalism that does not respect the individual's right to make their own choices. Others focus mainly on cleaning up their own act and respect others' right to live as they see fit. They may INFORM of the dangers of this or that - out of the goodness of their hearts, of course ;-) - but they don't get on anyone's case to change their ways, unless those ways are somehow having a direct negative impact on others. Inger Re: My take on religion, short version Sometimes people who realize urges lead people astray wish to teach others the same principle out of the goodness of their hearts though. Tom Administrator I think it is those who have not yet fully grown out of their own urges/addictions etc. who feel a need to fight them in others; what they are really doing is fighting them in themselves. Inger FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 Yes, sometimes. But I've not seen much goodness from the heart coming from conservative faction on this forum on THIS particular issue, only harsh judgementalism that does not respect the individual's right to make their own choices. Others focus mainly on cleaning up their own act and respect others' right to live as they see fit. They may INFORM of the dangers of this or that - out of the goodness of their hearts, of course ;-) - but they don't get on anyone's case to change their ways, unless those ways are somehow having a direct negative impact on others. Inger Re: My take on religion, short version Sometimes people who realize urges lead people astray wish to teach others the same principle out of the goodness of their hearts though. Tom Administrator I think it is those who have not yet fully grown out of their own urges/addictions etc. who feel a need to fight them in others; what they are really doing is fighting them in themselves. Inger FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. Check the Links section for more FAM forums. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 I think it is those who have not yet fully grown out of their own urges/addictions etc. who feel a need to fight them in others; what they are really doing is fighting them in themselves. Inger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 2006 Report Share Posted April 22, 2006 " We " would be whom Inger describes as the " conservative faction on this forum. " If you want names, ask Inger. She is the one who prejudicially compartimentalized us. Tom Administrator Who is 'we' ? Lida Inger: " Yes, sometimes. But I've not seen much goodness from the heart coming from conservative faction on this forum on THIS particular issue, only harsh judgementalism that does not respect the individual's right to make their own choices. " Tom: That's because you conveniently ignored the days when we DID try to help out of the goodness of our hearts. Now we have folks trying to portray illegal behavior as being fine and dandy, and us law abiding citizens just want them to be quiet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.