Guest guest Report post Posted March 23, 2006 I may not need to know exactly what the s are doing with their own child but since they are out in the public asking for money and have merged with NAAR, I think it quiet relevant to still ask what her stand on biomedical issues are. My back ground is genetics. I do believe genetics likely play a role. I think straight genetics studies are great for researchers who want perpetual funding. They are likely to find many " potential " genes. But I really don't want to give money to groups that won't directly pursue what the environmental influence on those genes are. Let the NIH and the pharmica money find the genes - let our money show how environment interacts with those genes (which incidentally is usually more expensive of a study). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites