Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 In a message dated 19/07/2006 19:36:53 GMT Daylight Time, awex@... writes: Anybody know for sure, the reason/reasons why the BMC has decided to drop claims against Wakefield. >>Not sure they have, not thats been released to my knoweldeg anyways. The press reports said it was likely that they wouldn't - have I missed something new? It has to be no case to answer IMHO Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 In a message dated 19/07/2006 20:23:26 GMT Daylight Time, Moroza-@... writes: Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR? Remis >>>Tee hee - nice one! Which reminds me to write Shattock for that page dump of the figures...............shoudl I tell him it was us and not the nurses? Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR? Remis Wakefield. Anybody know for sure, the reason/reasons why the BMC has decided to drop claims against Wakefield. Miles. -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 18/07/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 18/07/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 I think he’ll appreciate it, but I like to think of him not knowing about it as he goes armed to his talks. Sara xxx Re: Wakefield. In a message dated 19/07/2006 20:23:26 GMT Daylight Time, Moroza-@... writes: Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR? Remis >>>Tee hee - nice one! Which reminds me to write Shattock for that page dump of the figures...............shoudl I tell him it was us and not the nurses? Mandi x -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 18/07/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 18/07/2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 No you haven't missed anything Mandi. I am just impatient to know the excuse, so that I can decide if it's worth nagging channel 4 news to interview the health secretary. Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR?--- Very Funny!! . Mum231ASD@... wrote: > In a message dated 19/07/2006 19:36:53 GMT Daylight Time, > awex@... writes: > > Anybody know for sure, the reason/reasons why the BMC has decided to > drop claims against Wakefield. > > >>Not sure they have, not thats been released to my knoweldeg anyways. > The press reports said it was likely that they wouldn't - have I > missed something new? > > It has to be no case to answer IMHO > > Mandi x > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.1/391 - Release Date: 7/18/06 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 > > > In a message dated 19/07/2006 20:23:26 GMT Daylight Time, > Moroza-@... writes: > > > > > Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR? > Remis > > > > > > >>>Tee hee - nice one! Which reminds me to write Shattock for that page > dump of the figures...............shoudl I tell him it was us and not the > nurses? > > Mandi x > aaaaaaaagh no dont, I can see him now as he thinks back and remembers that short blonde in the back row with the pea head !!!!!! how nice it is to be giggling at 1am xxx it's actually a hard one to decide! cos bless, he probably got so excited thinking it was the nurses, and yet if someone else with not such good intentions found out................ Josie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 In a message dated 20/07/2006 15:08:19 GMT Daylight Time, Elaine.Rankin@... writes: don’t know if there is a right answer to your question. But he is a scientist and deals in facts. I can only assume he wouldn’t want to knowingly present misguided figures. We can justify what we did, after all it didn’t say you had to be a nurse to vote or that you could only vote once. Personally I think I would tell him, what do you think? Only I would tell him not to shoot the messenger!! >>>OH he wouldn;t - he would think its a hoot I am sure Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hi Mandi, I don’t know if there is a right answer to your question. But he is a scientist and deals in facts. I can only assume he wouldn’t want to knowingly present misguided figures. We can justify what we did, after all it didn’t say you had to be a nurse to vote or that you could only vote once. Personally I think I would tell him, what do you think? Only I would tell him not to shoot the messenger!! Elaine From: Autism Treatment [mailto:Autism Treatment ] On Behalf Of Mum231ASD@... Sent: 19 July 2006 20:26 Autism Treatment Subject: Re: Wakefield. In a message dated 19/07/2006 20:23:26 GMT Daylight Time, Moroza-@... writes: Because of the Nursing Times poll results on MMR? Remis >>>Tee hee - nice one! Which reminds me to write Shattock for that page dump of the figures...............shoudl I tell him it was us and not the nurses? Mandi x Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 --- > Only I would tell him not to shoot the messenger!! > > > >>>OH he wouldn;t - he would think its a hoot I am sure > > Mandi x > I am pretty sure that the votes from this group made a difference, but there must have been a huge number of votes alltogether, I know that I was amazed at how many times I voted before the percentage changed. Also, a member of this group I may be, but I am also a nurse, and I am sure I am not the only one, so my votes were definitely legit, tee hee. Sue Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.