A GNM expert replies concerning food and diseases

[Guest guest]

At my homepage www.rolf-martens.com I've added today, under

" News with brief comments " :

Tuesday, 13 June 2006 (NWBC 179) A GNM expert replies

concerning food and diseases

2006-06-13, 03:37 GMT:

At the Vaccinations mailing list, we among other things have

been discussing the radically new theory on medicine

developed by Dr Ryke Geerd Hamer, the New Medicine or German

New Medicine - see its homepage in English and some other

websites linked to under " On a (not quite) new theory on

medicine " in the " Links " section of my homepage.

[Vaccinations/

http://www.newmedicine.ca/]

Another list member among other things wrote that she judged

the question of eating the healthiest possible food to be

very important for preventing diseases, to which I replied

that I on my (non-expert) part didn't think that this played

an all that vital role. We agreed that it would be interes-

ting to ask " the New Medicine people " what was their opinion

on this, something which my co-debater did, and on 31 May the

list members got to see a reply in German which I'm repro-

ducing here and have promised I would translate as soon as I

found the time for this.

Here now is first the text of the 31.05 message with the

reply and then my translation of the latter, plus also a

comment by me on one of the statements in that reply.

Hi Rolf,

That's the answer I got from GNM. I am still not 100% sure

the food doesn't play a role...

LG

[signed, first name of my co-debater]

Prinzipiell: die GNM gilt für jene Krankheiten, die von sich

aus entstehen. Also für Krebs, chronische Krankheiten,

Allergien und Psychosen.

Sie gilt nicht für: Verletzungen, Vergiftungen und auch nicht

für extreme Mangelernährunge, wie z.B. Skorbut.

Ernährung ist wichtig! Ohne Ernährung würden wir sterben. In

der aktiven Phase haben wir kaum Appetit (Kachexie, Aus-

zehrung). In der Heilungsphase können wir futtern wie ein

Scheunendrescher und sollen es auch. Egal was wir essen. In

so einer Heilungsphase sollen wir essen was uns schmeckt.

Allerdings gibt es keine Ernährungsform, die Sie vor Krebs

schützen könnte, Ihnen Ihren Krebs heilen könnte, und auch

keine die Ihnen Krebs, Neurodermitis, Diabetes oder MS aus-

lösen könnte.

Hinzuweisen ist natürlich auf die ganzen Schadstoffe, welche

in der Nahrung oft enthalten sind.Für Gifte gilt die GNM aber

nicht.

Eine gesunde Ernährung ist auf jedenfall vorteilshaft.

Pestizide, Genmanipulation, Antibiotika usw. ist vielfach ein

Verbrechen an uns Menschen und an der Natur aus Profitsucht.

mit freundlichen Grüßen

Ing. Helmut Pilhar

AMICI DI DIRK ÖSTERREICH

[END OF QUOTE]

Which I'm translating as:

" On principle: The GMN [German New Medicine] is valid for

those diseases which arise by themselves. Thus for cancer,

chronical illnesses, allergies and psychoses.

It is not valid for: Injuries, poisonings, and also not for

extreme nourishment deficiences, such as scurvy.

Nourishment is important! Without nourishment we would die.

In the active phase [of a disease, - the GNM says that

those phenomena which traditional or orthodox medicine is

calling " diseases " in reality are special, sense-making

repair programs which the bodies of humans and animals have

as replies to certain shocks, which are what initiate the

" diseases " , and it distinguishes between two phases of such a

program, namely, the conflict-active or active phase, which

comes first, and the healing phase, which comes later - RM],

we hardly have any appetite (shit-readiness, sapping of one's

strength). In the healing phase we can eat like a horse and

should do so too. No difference what we eat. In such a

healing phase we should eat that which tastes good to us.

Certainly there is no form of nourishment which could pro-

tect you against cancer, which could cure your cancer, and

also none which could trigger cancer, neurodermatitis,

diabetes or MS in you.

Of course one must point at all those harmful substances

which the nourishment often contains. For poisons however the

GNM is not valid.

A sound intake of nourishment is advantageous in any case.

Pesticides, gene manipulation and antibiotics in many diffe-

rent ways are a crime against us humans and against nature

out of profit hunger.

With friendly greetings,

Ing. [this title in German literally means " Engineer " - RM]

Helmut Pilhar

AMICI DI DIRK; AUSTRIA "

A comment by me on the last statement here: On those three

types of substances respectively activities mentioned here

I'm no expert either, but I doubt that this statement on all

of those is completely correct. As the writer himself indi-

cated, the questions of pesticides and of gene manipulation

lie outside the field of the German New Medicine too. Con-

cerning one pesticide, DDT, I since long have been opposing

those bans against it which were initiated by the US govern-

ment in the early 1970s and I still am opposing them at my

homepage - see under " DDT " in my " Subjects in postings " sec-

tion and " On the pesticide DDT " in " Links " - but I've recent-

ly seen some arguments which I find are making necessary at

least a review of whether I'm really doing the right thing in

this or not. I intend to return to this question later, and

also am planning to inform myself more on the question of

gene manipulation. I so far have seen no valid scientific

argument against this. The GNM theory, of which I today have

only scant knowledge but which I've concluded is correct,

does indicate that antibiotics are really useless and

harmful.

_____________________

Message posted by:

Rolf Martens

Malmö, Sweden

Phone and fax:

+46 - 40 - 124832;

rolf.martens@...

www.rolf-martens.com

______________________