Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: Fluroide/Water Filter

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Kim, When I was researching water filters and purifiers, I could not find any reverse osmosis filters that removed fluoride.  I think you would have to buy some type of extra add on to remove the fluoride, if that was available.  LinnOn Jun 12, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Kim Hanson wrote:I believe reverse osmosis purifiers remove fluoride.  Sorry if this is a duplicate post, I'm not sure which group this info was posted on.  Apparently Wal-Mart/Sam's Club has a bottled water that is processed via reverse osmosis. When researching my own water purifier I was shocked to find out that it does not make any claims to remove or even lessen chlorine content.  It is a carbon block.  I still need to contact the manufacturer to verify. I'm on a community well.  I'm still trying to get a hold of the company that runs it to find out if they are adding fluoride to the water. Kim in TexasFrom: iodine [mailto:iodine ] On Behalf Of braguet@...Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 8:05 AMiodine Subject: Re: Hashimoto's questionIn a message dated 6/10/2006 7:09:07 PM Eastern Daylight Time, linnmiller@... writes:Regarding drinking lots of water, do you use a filter that removes fluoride?Is there such a thing?  I have not heard of it yet if there is. Bonnie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

The R-O unit I use claims to remove 98% of fluoride. The people who sell this particular unit have been very helpful to me. I have been using this unit now for 8 years and am very happy with it. The first link show how much of what chemicals are removed, and the second link is to their main page.

http://www.h2ro.com/_Removal.htmhttp://www.h2ro.com/AlobarOn 6/12/06,

Linn <linnmiller@...> wrote:

Kim, When I was researching water filters and purifiers, I could not find any reverse osmosis filters that removed fluoride. I think you would have to buy some type of extra add on to remove the fluoride, if that was available.

Linn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

You might want to be careful of vending machine water as there are no health safegarding regulations in place. See here for details: http://www.h2ro.com/_Vending.htm

AlobarOn 6/12/06, Kim Hanson <khanson93065@...> wrote:

I believe reverse osmosis purifiers remove fluoride. Sorry if this is a duplicate post, I'm not sure which group this info was posted on. Apparently Wal-Mart/Sam's Club has a bottled water that is processed via reverse osmosis.

When researching my own water purifier I was shocked to find out that it does not make any claims to remove or even lessen chlorine content. It is a carbon block. I still need to contact the manufacturer to verify.

I'm on a community well. I'm still trying to get a hold of the company that runs it to find out if they are adding fluoride to the water.

Kim in Texas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Thanks, I'll check that out.  I didn't research R-O units as much as the others though as they remove the minerals from the water, didn't want to lose those.  LinnOn Jun 12, 2006, at 11:45 PM, Alobar wrote:           The R-O unit I use claims to remove 98% of fluoride.  The people who sell this particular unit have been very helpful to me.  I have been using this unit now for 8 years and am very happy with it.   The first link show how much of what chemicals are removed, and the second link is to their main page. http://www.h2ro.com/_Removal.htmhttp://www.h2ro.com/AlobarOn 6/12/06, Linn <linnmiller@...> wrote:Kim, When I was researching water filters and purifiers, I could not find any reverse osmosis filters that removed fluoride.  I think you would have to buy some type of extra add on to remove the fluoride, if that was available.  Linn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I am planning on getting a Berkey Light water filter. I am impressed

by all that it removes... beyond what a reverse-osmosis or distilling

system can do, including, specifically, a filter just for removing

flouride and arsenic. I am not sold on the process of RO. I don't

think a distiller can remove VOD's, as they have a higher boiling

point than water and some people I've read have complained that

distilled water's ph is messed up. I am sure someone pro-RO or pro-

distiller will correct me if I am wrong.) Anyway, before I stumbled

on the Berkey, I was seriously considering a solar still... but it's

those pesky chemicals I kept having to worry about. Berkey seemed the

perfect solution once I finally found out about it.

Katharine

http://www.arkinstitute.com/themes/waterfilters.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Lakota Scientific sells non-RO filters with an optional fluoride

filter. I don't know what percentage of fluoride it removes but just

sent an email asking them. I do know they are a very nice company to

deal with.

Sharon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I am suspicious of the Berkey water filter. The website says

" Additionally, these filters will reduce chlorine, " but it does not

say by how much. It does not mention Fluoride at all. Likewise it

does not say how much organic waste is removed. Compare to R-O

filtration here:

http://www.h2ro.com/_Removal.htm

Alobar

On 6/13/06, mooredlighthouse <mooredlighthouse@...> wrote:

> I am planning on getting a Berkey Light water filter. I am impressed

> by all that it removes... beyond what a reverse-osmosis or distilling

> system can do, including, specifically, a filter just for removing

> flouride and arsenic. I am not sold on the process of RO. I don't

> think a distiller can remove VOD's, as they have a higher boiling

> point than water and some people I've read have complained that

> distilled water's ph is messed up. I am sure someone pro-RO or pro-

> distiller will correct me if I am wrong.) Anyway, before I stumbled

> on the Berkey, I was seriously considering a solar still... but it's

> those pesky chemicals I kept having to worry about. Berkey seemed the

> perfect solution once I finally found out about it.

>

> Katharine

>

> http://www.arkinstitute.com/themes/waterfilters.htm

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Alobar, I don't think you read far enough on the site. No matter,

below are some links with more of the scientific studies you were

looking for about the Berkey Light. This company has been around

since 1847 - that's almost 160 years, more than 5 times longer than

H2RO. Additionally, I take personal issue (because of personal life

experience)with anything that openly professes itself to be the

reverse of any natural process... such as REVERSE osmosis. I will

take natural osmosis verses reverse osmosis any day of the week.

Gimmie some rainwater, filter it through a Berkey, and you have a

happy campler. Call it just being me... or just being unwilling to

trust a backwards process.

(See: Black Berkey, PF2, PF4, LSU report)at:

http://newmillconcepts.com/BLight_brochures.html

or

http://www.jamesfilter.com/specifications.htm

or

http://www.pleasanthillgrain.com/berkey_light_big_berkey_water_filter

_british_berkefeld_portable_purifier.asp

Katharine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I am not sure what to look at on the first link as it lists a bunch of

different PDF files. The second link talks about efficiency in

removing particles. Nothing about eith Chlorine or Fluoride. The

third link talks about reducing heavy metals but it does not say how

much it reduces them. Again, no mention of Chlorine or Fluoride.

Since this thread began with questions about Fluoride removal, it

seems to me that one would want a unit which actually removes

Fluoride.

Just because something has been around a long time does not make it

better. I am not saying because a process is new, that makes it

better either. One must evaluate each option for oneself. The

Berkey unit looks good if I wanted to drink lake water and remove

bacteria and sediment. Especially useful if no electricity is

available. To me, when using city water, removal of chlorine and

fluoride seems like a much higher priority.

Reverse osmosis isn't against nature. Buckminster Fuller once

commented (paraphrasing from memory here)That which is against nature

is imposible. The thyroid concentrates Iodine from the blood. That

is reverse osmosis. Nothing un-natural about it at all.

Alobar

On 6/13/06, mooredlighthouse <mooredlighthouse@...> wrote:

> Alobar, I don't think you read far enough on the site. No matter,

> below are some links with more of the scientific studies you were

> looking for about the Berkey Light. This company has been around

> since 1847 - that's almost 160 years, more than 5 times longer than

> H2RO. Additionally, I take personal issue (because of personal life

> experience)with anything that openly professes itself to be the

> reverse of any natural process... such as REVERSE osmosis. I will

> take natural osmosis verses reverse osmosis any day of the week.

> Gimmie some rainwater, filter it through a Berkey, and you have a

> happy campler. Call it just being me... or just being unwilling to

> trust a backwards process.

>

> (See: Black Berkey, PF2, PF4, LSU report)at:

> http://newmillconcepts.com/BLight_brochures.html

>

> or

>

> http://www.jamesfilter.com/specifications.htm

>

> or

>

> http://www.pleasanthillgrain.com/berkey_light_big_berkey_water_filter

> _british_berkefeld_portable_purifier.asp

>

>

> Katharine

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...