Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

[Guest guest]

> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS THERE A

> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB RADIO. !!!

Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming device?

It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...

Marc

[Guest guest]

It is like chasing the devil with Satan.

Greetings,

Claessens

member Verband Baubiologie

www.milieuziektes.nl

www.milieuziektes.be

www.hetbitje.nl

checked by Norton Antivirus

Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

>> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS THERE A

>> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB RADIO. !!!

>

> Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming device?

>

> It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...

>

> Marc

>

[Guest guest]

That was my first thought ! Jamming includes still more em emissions

I imagine. Now, I wouldn't say no to a dedicated machine use for

targeting the emf, ahahah. In fact that would be the best thing we

could come up with. Smart sabotage of phone mast, dect phone, wifi.

Yesterday, I measured a peak at 50 uW for the dect signal. No wonder

I need a lot of coffee in the morning to wake up. But today I feel a

little bit better, because I put an aluminium paper shield against

the dect signal(I measured that it didn't make much worse the phone

mast signal coming from the opposite direction). But I doubt I'm

gonna have a lasting break.

jean.

>

> It is like chasing the devil with Satan.

>

> Greetings,

> Claessens

> member Verband Baubiologie

> www.milieuziektes.nl

> www.milieuziektes.be

> www.hetbitje.nl

> checked by Norton Antivirus

>

>

>

> Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

>

>

> >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS

THERE A

> >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB

RADIO. !!!

> >

> > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming

device?

> >

> > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...

> >

> > Marc

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Hello

You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting DECT signals.

They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.

Greetings,

Claessens

member Verband Baubiologie

www.milieuziektes.nl

www.milieuziektes.be

www.hetbitje.nl

checked by Norton Antivirus

Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

>>

>>

>> >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS

> THERE A

>> >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB

> RADIO. !!!

>> >

>> > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming

> device?

>> >

>> > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...

>> >

>> > Marc

>> >

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi ,

yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.

Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel, it

goes on scanning all the predefined dect channels.

But for the values, the scales are the same as for the other

frequencies. I can measure values in the magnitude of the uW/m2, it

can measure still below, like in the nW/m2. 2000 uW/m2 !!! I'm

scared, you mean that the measures on the display are wrong ????

jean.

>

> Hello

>

> You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting DECT

signals.

> They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.

>

> Greetings,

> Claessens

> member Verband Baubiologie

> www.milieuziektes.nl

> www.milieuziektes.be

> www.hetbitje.nl

> checked by Norton Antivirus

>

[Guest guest]

I'm really anxious to know more about that, because for now I've

measured from 5 to 20 uW/m2 for the dect channels. I understand this

is precisely where my meter is wrong : getting the value for a single

isolated frequency. Now if you're telling me that in fact the value

is like 2000uW/m2 or more instead of the 20 uW/m2 displayed !!!!!!

I'll be back later if you answer today.

jean.

> >

> > Hello

> >

> > You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting

DECT

> signals.

> > They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.

> >

> > Greetings,

> > Claessens

> > member Verband Baubiologie

> > www.milieuziektes.nl

> > www.milieuziektes.be

> > www.hetbitje.nl

> > checked by Norton Antivirus

> >

>

[Guest guest]

We do not bother about nW/m2.

For us, the uW/m2 are important.

Regarding DECT signals, this meter gives only what we call *housenumbers*.

I am sorry for you, but that is the case.

Greetings,

Claessens

member Verband Baubiologie

www.milieuziektes.nl

www.milieuziektes.be

www.hetbitje.nl

checked by Norton Antivirus

Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

> Hi ,

>

> yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.

>

> Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel, it

> goes on scanning all the predefined dect channels.

>

> But for the values, the scales are the same as for the other

> frequencies. I can measure values in the magnitude of the uW/m2, it

> can measure still below, like in the nW/m2. 2000 uW/m2 !!! I'm

> scared, you mean that the measures on the display are wrong ????

>

> jean.

>

>

>

>>

>> Hello

>>

>> You do know that your HF meter has great trouble in detecting DECT

> signals.

>> They mostly give signals from 2.000 up to 20.000 uW/m2 or more.

>>

>> Greetings,

>> Claessens

>> member Verband Baubiologie

>> www.milieuziektes.nl

>> www.milieuziektes.be

>> www.hetbitje.nl

>> checked by Norton Antivirus

>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

HI,

I'm curious, has anyone been able to try the jammers? As far as I've

looked they're not legal in the U.S.

My first thoughts agree, it would add more. Then again, perhaps it

works like noise cancellation tech. making an equal and opposite wave

that cancels each other out. Anyone know?

~ Snoshoe

> >

> > It is like chasing the devil with Satan.

> >

> > Greetings,

> > Claessens

> > member Verband Baubiologie

> > www.milieuziektes.nl

> > www.milieuziektes.be

> > www.hetbitje.nl

> > checked by Norton Antivirus

> >

> >

> >

> > Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

> >

> >

> > >> I KNOW THAT WIFI CAN BE JAMMED OR WOBBLED BY DECT SIGNALS IS

> THERE A

> > >> DEVICE THAT CAN INTERFERE WITH DECT ? HOW ABOUT AN AM CB

> RADIO. !!!

> > >

> > > Wouldn't a person with ES have trouble tolerating the jamming

> device?

> > >

> > > It seems like you'd want fewer signals, not more...

> > >

> > > Marc

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

That would still be okay if there was some kind of multiplication

factor. Say if I measure 10 uW on my meter I just have to multiply

it by 20 to find the correct value.

Now, I borrowed the meter with the green large antenna, one year ago,

and maybe the measures for the phone mast were of the same range than

what I can get right now with my meter. I have to find back the

recored I made, though.

Okay more news : close to the wall with the neighbor, I measured up

to 140 uW for the dect today...

jean.

>

> We do not bother about nW/m2.

> For us, the uW/m2 are important.

>

> Regarding DECT signals, this meter gives only what we call

*housenumbers*.

> I am sorry for you, but that is the case.

>

>

> Greetings,

> Claessens

> member Verband Baubiologie

> www.milieuziektes.nl

> www.milieuziektes.be

> www.hetbitje.nl

> checked by Norton Antivirus

>

> Re: JAMMING OF DECT SIGNALS

>

>

> > Hi ,

> >

> > yes I understand my meter is very unprecise.

> >

> > Also so far I have not been able to measure one single channel,

it

> > goes on scanning all the predefined dect channels.

> >

> > But for the values, the scales are the same as for the other

> > frequencies. I can measure values in the magnitude of the uW/m2,

it

> > can measure still below, like in the nW/m2. 2000 uW/m2 !!! I'm

> > scared, you mean that the measures on the display are wrong ????

> >

> > jean.