Jump to content
RemedySpot.com
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

Re: Re: Re: milk statement

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Several people have mentioned that HGH is not really good for me.

Yet the doctor who cured my 12 year old of ADHD used to have me take one HGH

supplement a day, and back then my energy level was GREAT.

I am now using a reduced Dr. 's regimen (everything minus vitamins A,

C, D, E and thyroid support pills).

I also take some iron, selenium and Germanium 132, which I am told increase

the effectiveness of the Paw Paw and Protocel I am on.

Plus I of course use Dr. 's zapper in the daytime and a plasma device

at night.

What with my cancer and everything, should I get back to taking HGH as well?

My energy level is not what it used to be...

Luigi

Re: Re: milk statement

> The one early study that tentatively implicated growth factors in

> cancer growh was exposed to be a bad study. Cancer rate was REDUCED

> (to almost nothing) in a study on HGH therapy given to elderly

> gentlemen, compared with controls

>

> Duncan

>

> On 21 Dec 2005 at 13:55, Dr wrote:

>

>>

>>

>>

>> I think he's referring to the growth hormone...

>>

>> Khepri

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

On 12/22/05, Duncan Crow <duncancrow@...> wrote:

>

> The one early study that tentatively implicated growth factors in

> cancer growh was exposed to be a bad study.

Was that study related to dairy though?

Also, I don't think it's HGH that the dairy farmers are administering to the

cows is it?

I believe they're using a hormone to increase milk production from the

animal...

Whether this particular hormone effects cancer cells seems to be discounted

according to what you're citing...

So the question is....did they study ALL growth hormone or just certain

ones...

Now here's the puzzling thing;

http://www.notmilk.com/drlarsen.html

" IGF-1 is known to stimulate the growth of both normal and cancerous

cells(2,5). In 1990 researchers at Stanford University reported that IGF-1

promotes the growth of prostate cells(2). This was followed by the discovery

that IGF-1 accelerates the growth of breast cancer cells(6-8). In 1995

researchers at the National Institutes of Health reported that IGF-1 plays a

central role in the progression of many childhood cancers and in the growth

of tumours in breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and cancers

of the pancreas and prostate(9). In September 1997 an international team of

researchers reported the first epidemiological evidence that high IGF-1

concentrations are closely linked to an increased risk of prostate

cancer(10). Other researchers provided evidence of IGF-1's link to breast

and colon cancers(10,11). "

Which of these 8 studies are you saying was the flawed one?

Regardless, in relation to what you stated, " The body's production of IGF-1

is regulated by the human growth hormone and peaks at puberty. "

Seems to me you are both correct.

Khepri

Cancer rate was REDUCED

> (to almost nothing) in a study on HGH therapy given to elderly

> gentlemen, compared with controls

>

> Duncan

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...